对乌尔三世时期强迫劳动的处罚

IF 0.8 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

International Review of Social History Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1017/s0020859022000864

J. Nicholas Reid

{"title":"对乌尔三世时期强迫劳动的处罚","authors":"J. Nicholas Reid","doi":"10.1017/s0020859022000864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article traces corporal and collective punishment in relation to the labour control of slaves and other dependent persons during the Ur III period (c.2100–2000 BCE). Slaves and other dependent persons often worked in related contexts with some overlap in treatment. Persons of different statuses could be detained and forced to work. Persons of various statuses also received rations and other benefits, but the evidence suggests that the most extreme forms of corporal punishment were reserved for slaves. This article, however, contextualizes these threats of mutilation and the death penalty, demonstrating that such punishments should be considered the exception and not the norm.</p>","PeriodicalId":46254,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social History","volume":"63 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Punishment for the Coercion of Labour during the Ur III Period\",\"authors\":\"J. Nicholas Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0020859022000864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article traces corporal and collective punishment in relation to the labour control of slaves and other dependent persons during the Ur III period (c.2100–2000 BCE). Slaves and other dependent persons often worked in related contexts with some overlap in treatment. Persons of different statuses could be detained and forced to work. Persons of various statuses also received rations and other benefits, but the evidence suggests that the most extreme forms of corporal punishment were reserved for slaves. This article, however, contextualizes these threats of mutilation and the death penalty, demonstrating that such punishments should be considered the exception and not the norm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Social History\",\"volume\":\"63 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020859022000864\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020859022000864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章追溯了乌尔三世时期(公元前2100 - 2000年)与奴隶和其他依赖者的劳动控制有关的体罚和集体惩罚。奴隶和其他被依赖的人经常在相关的环境中工作，在待遇上有些重叠。不同身份的人都可能被拘留并被迫工作。各种地位的人也得到口粮和其他福利，但证据表明，最极端的体罚是留给奴隶的。然而，本条将这些残割和死刑的威胁置于背景之下，表明这类惩罚应被视为例外，而不是常态。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Punishment for the Coercion of Labour during the Ur III Period

This article traces corporal and collective punishment in relation to the labour control of slaves and other dependent persons during the Ur III period (c.2100–2000 BCE). Slaves and other dependent persons often worked in related contexts with some overlap in treatment. Persons of different statuses could be detained and forced to work. Persons of various statuses also received rations and other benefits, but the evidence suggests that the most extreme forms of corporal punishment were reserved for slaves. This article, however, contextualizes these threats of mutilation and the death penalty, demonstrating that such punishments should be considered the exception and not the norm.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Review of Social History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Review of Social History, is one of the leading journals in its field. Truly global in its scope, it focuses on research in social and labour history from a comparative and transnational perspective, both in the modern and in the early modern period, and across periods. The journal combines quality, depth and originality of its articles with an open eye for theoretical innovation and new insights and methods from within its field and from contiguous disciplines. Besides research articles, it features surveys of new themes and subject fields, a suggestions and debates section, review essays and book reviews. It is esteemed for its annotated bibliography of social history titles, and also publishes an annual supplement of specially commissioned essays on a current theme.