走向企业社会不负责任理论化:DéjàVu林业企业倒闭案例

IF 3.6 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Tiffany C. H. Leung, Artie W. Ng, Andreas G. F. Hoepner, Maretno A. Harjoto
{"title":"走向企业社会不负责任理论化:DéjàVu林业企业倒闭案例","authors":"Tiffany C. H. Leung,&nbsp;Artie W. Ng,&nbsp;Andreas G. F. Hoepner,&nbsp;Maretno A. Harjoto","doi":"10.1111/beer.12551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on case studies and secondary data, this study theorises how and why firms engage in corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR). Using the inductive process of theory building based on case studies of two forestry companies operating in China, this study explains how and why organisations with initial intentions towards corporate social responsibility (CSR) engage in CSIR based on paths taken and the behaviours across micro (individual), meso (organisational), and macro (industry) levels. Hence, there is a ‘grey zone’ between CSR and CSIR (Clark, C. E., Riera, M., &amp; Iborra, M. (2021). <i>Business &amp; Society</i>, <b>61</b>, 1473–1511. 10.1177/00076503211015911). This study extends the path dependence literature on CSIR (Küberling-Jost, J.A. (2019). <i>Journal of Business Ethics</i>, <b>169</b>(3), 579–601) by integrating moral disengagement and the theory of planned behaviour, stakeholder agency, and institutional theory into path dependence theory based on observed behaviours across micro, meso, and macro levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"32 4","pages":"1452-1469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards theorising corporate social irresponsibility: The Déjà Vu cases of collapsed forestry ventures\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany C. H. Leung,&nbsp;Artie W. Ng,&nbsp;Andreas G. F. Hoepner,&nbsp;Maretno A. Harjoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/beer.12551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Based on case studies and secondary data, this study theorises how and why firms engage in corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR). Using the inductive process of theory building based on case studies of two forestry companies operating in China, this study explains how and why organisations with initial intentions towards corporate social responsibility (CSR) engage in CSIR based on paths taken and the behaviours across micro (individual), meso (organisational), and macro (industry) levels. Hence, there is a ‘grey zone’ between CSR and CSIR (Clark, C. E., Riera, M., &amp; Iborra, M. (2021). <i>Business &amp; Society</i>, <b>61</b>, 1473–1511. 10.1177/00076503211015911). This study extends the path dependence literature on CSIR (Küberling-Jost, J.A. (2019). <i>Journal of Business Ethics</i>, <b>169</b>(3), 579–601) by integrating moral disengagement and the theory of planned behaviour, stakeholder agency, and institutional theory into path dependence theory based on observed behaviours across micro, meso, and macro levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"1452-1469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12551\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于案例研究和二次数据,本研究对企业如何以及为什么参与企业社会不负责任(CSIR)进行了理论分析。本研究采用基于中国两家林业公司案例研究的理论构建归纳过程,根据微观(个人)、中观(组织)和宏观(行业)层面的路径和行为,解释了最初致力于企业社会责任(CSR)的组织是如何以及为什么参与CSIR的。因此,CSR和CSIR之间存在“灰色地带”(Clark,C.E.,Riera,M.,&;Iborra,M.(2021)。商业&;社会,611473-1511。10.1177/000776503211015911)。本研究扩展了CSIR的路径依赖文献(Küberling Jost,J.A.(2019)。《商业伦理杂志》,169(3),579-601),将道德脱离和计划行为理论、利益相关者代理和制度理论整合到基于微观、中观和宏观层面观察行为的路径依赖理论中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards theorising corporate social irresponsibility: The Déjà Vu cases of collapsed forestry ventures

Based on case studies and secondary data, this study theorises how and why firms engage in corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR). Using the inductive process of theory building based on case studies of two forestry companies operating in China, this study explains how and why organisations with initial intentions towards corporate social responsibility (CSR) engage in CSIR based on paths taken and the behaviours across micro (individual), meso (organisational), and macro (industry) levels. Hence, there is a ‘grey zone’ between CSR and CSIR (Clark, C. E., Riera, M., & Iborra, M. (2021). Business & Society, 61, 1473–1511. 10.1177/00076503211015911). This study extends the path dependence literature on CSIR (Küberling-Jost, J.A. (2019). Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 579–601) by integrating moral disengagement and the theory of planned behaviour, stakeholder agency, and institutional theory into path dependence theory based on observed behaviours across micro, meso, and macro levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信