{"title":"英国承包商对尼日利亚的仲裁裁决是三个连续的,ADR政治争议","authors":"Paulina Jedrzejowski","doi":"10.1002/alt.22003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are developments on the way in a long-running case involving an allegedly fraudulent $11 billion arbitral award against Nigeria, in which the District of Columbia U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year reaffirmed that foreign sovereigns are not immune from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts in arbitration cases. <i>Process and Industrial Developments Ltd. v. Fed. Republic of Nigeria,</i> 27 F.4th 771 (D.C. Cir. 2022). The decision left a longstanding arbitration award undisturbed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"41 6","pages":"93-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.K. Contractor's Arbitration Award Against Nigeria Is a Three-Continent, ADR-in-Politics Controversy\",\"authors\":\"Paulina Jedrzejowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alt.22003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There are developments on the way in a long-running case involving an allegedly fraudulent $11 billion arbitral award against Nigeria, in which the District of Columbia U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year reaffirmed that foreign sovereigns are not immune from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts in arbitration cases. <i>Process and Industrial Developments Ltd. v. Fed. Republic of Nigeria,</i> 27 F.4th 771 (D.C. Cir. 2022). The decision left a longstanding arbitration award undisturbed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"93-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
U.K. Contractor's Arbitration Award Against Nigeria Is a Three-Continent, ADR-in-Politics Controversy
There are developments on the way in a long-running case involving an allegedly fraudulent $11 billion arbitral award against Nigeria, in which the District of Columbia U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year reaffirmed that foreign sovereigns are not immune from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts in arbitration cases. Process and Industrial Developments Ltd. v. Fed. Republic of Nigeria, 27 F.4th 771 (D.C. Cir. 2022). The decision left a longstanding arbitration award undisturbed.