Coinbase诉Bielski案——不止是一起关于仲裁上诉中止的案件?

Kristen M. Blankley
{"title":"Coinbase诉Bielski案——不止是一起关于仲裁上诉中止的案件?","authors":"Kristen M. Blankley","doi":"10.1002/alt.22010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The question presented in the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in <i>Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski</i>, 599 U.S. __, 2023 WL 4138983 (2023) (available at https://bit.ly/3D4eDLw), evokes one of the most famous lines in all of punk rock: “Should I stay or should I go now?” The Clash, “Should I Stay or Should I Go?” Combat Rock (Epic 1982).</p>","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"41 8","pages":"118-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coinbase v. Bielski—More than a Case About Stays for Arbitration Appeals?\",\"authors\":\"Kristen M. Blankley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alt.22010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The question presented in the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in <i>Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski</i>, 599 U.S. __, 2023 WL 4138983 (2023) (available at https://bit.ly/3D4eDLw), evokes one of the most famous lines in all of punk rock: “Should I stay or should I go now?” The Clash, “Should I Stay or Should I Go?” Combat Rock (Epic 1982).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"volume\":\"41 8\",\"pages\":\"118-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国最高法院最近在Coinbase,股份有限公司诉Bielski案中的裁决中提出的问题,599 U.S.__2023 WL 4138983(2023)(可在https://bit.ly/3D4eDLw),唤起了朋克摇滚中最著名的一句台词:“我应该留下还是现在就走?”the Clash,“我应该留在还是应该走?”Combat rock(Epic 1982)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coinbase v. Bielski—More than a Case About Stays for Arbitration Appeals?

The question presented in the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. __, 2023 WL 4138983 (2023) (available at https://bit.ly/3D4eDLw), evokes one of the most famous lines in all of punk rock: “Should I stay or should I go now?” The Clash, “Should I Stay or Should I Go?” Combat Rock (Epic 1982).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信