仲裁员披露：怪物能源之后发生了什么？

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1002/alt.22017

Ju Hee Ahn

{"title":"仲裁员披露：怪物能源之后发生了什么？","authors":"Ju Hee Ahn","doi":"10.1002/alt.22017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals four years ago generated buzz throughout the legal community and among arbitration practitioners about the levels of disclosure to be made by arbitrators when it issued Monster Energy Co. v. City Beverages LLC, 940 F.3d 1130, 1135 (9th Cir. 2019) (available at bit.ly/43HZ5Ic).","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"41 9","pages":"143-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbitrator Disclosure: What Happened after Monster Energy?\",\"authors\":\"Ju Hee Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alt.22017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals four years ago generated buzz throughout the legal community and among arbitration practitioners about the levels of disclosure to be made by arbitrators when it issued Monster Energy Co. v. City Beverages LLC, 940 F.3d 1130, 1135 (9th Cir. 2019) (available at bit.ly/43HZ5Ic).\",\"PeriodicalId\":100074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"143-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

四年前，美国第九巡回上诉法院发布了Monster Energy Co.诉City Beverages LLC案，《联邦判例汇编》第三卷第940卷第1130页，第1135页（第九巡回法院，2019年）（可查阅bit.ly/43HZ5Ic），这在整个法律界和仲裁从业人员中引发了对仲裁员披露水平的热议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Arbitrator Disclosure: What Happened after Monster Energy?

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals four years ago generated buzz throughout the legal community and among arbitration practitioners about the levels of disclosure to be made by arbitrators when it issued Monster Energy Co. v. City Beverages LLC, 940 F.3d 1130, 1135 (9th Cir. 2019) (available at bit.ly/43HZ5Ic).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation

自引率

0.00%

发文量