南海北部北部湾盆地西北部魏西南凹陷近海CO2储存潜力评价

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Jian Xie, Xiaofeng Gou, Jian Guo
{"title":"南海北部北部湾盆地西北部魏西南凹陷近海CO2储存潜力评价","authors":"Jian Xie,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Gou,&nbsp;Jian Guo","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Geologic carbon storage (GCS) activities, especially offshore, are still far insufficient worldwide. Sedimentary basins in the northern South China Sea (nSCS) are identified to be favorable to offshore GCS deployment. This study investigates by numerical reservoir simulations the performance of the Weixinan Sag in the northern depression of the Beibu Gulf Basin (BGB), which is considered the most promising area for CO<sub>2</sub> offshore GCS in saline formations. Simulations of CO<sub>2</sub> injection at a potential site with a normal fault indicate that the pressure buildup induced by CO<sub>2</sub> horizontal injection could penetrate extremely low-permeability faults or caprock formations. The CO<sub>2</sub> plumes under higher injection pressures are more constrained in the horizontal direction and hence appear thicker while CO<sub>2</sub> tends to spread out horizontally in conditions of low pressure. The impermeable fault renders the CO<sub>2</sub> plume about 200 m smaller in size horizontally. Assuming the presence of a fault with a highly permeable core causes leakage to occur after about 30 years of injection, which accounts for only 0.04% the injected amount. For the vertical-well injection case, the potential CO<sub>2</sub> leakage only accounts for around 0.28% of the injection amount, which is far less than the criterion (i.e., 2%) required to make GCS worthwhile. The storage capacities of the formations are mainly controlled by the depths and thicknesses since both their porosities and permeabilities are comparable. The formation Jiaowei-2 and Xiayang have the largest and second largest storage capacities, respectively, when using a fully perforated well for vertical injection. The average storage capacity of the studied site is 13.04 kg m<sup>−3</sup>, which is comparable to that of the formation Xiayang. Average injectivities of formations Jiaowei-2, Xiayang, Weizhou-1, and Weizhou-3 are 8.29 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, 1.75 × 10<sup>−4</sup>, 6.58 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, and 2.99 × 10<sup>−3</sup> kg s<sup>−1</sup> Pa<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. © 2022 The Authors. <i>Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology</i> published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing a potential site for offshore CO2 storage in the Weixinan Sag in the northwestern Beibu Gulf Basin, northern South China Sea\",\"authors\":\"Jian Xie,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Gou,&nbsp;Jian Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ghg.2199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Geologic carbon storage (GCS) activities, especially offshore, are still far insufficient worldwide. Sedimentary basins in the northern South China Sea (nSCS) are identified to be favorable to offshore GCS deployment. This study investigates by numerical reservoir simulations the performance of the Weixinan Sag in the northern depression of the Beibu Gulf Basin (BGB), which is considered the most promising area for CO<sub>2</sub> offshore GCS in saline formations. Simulations of CO<sub>2</sub> injection at a potential site with a normal fault indicate that the pressure buildup induced by CO<sub>2</sub> horizontal injection could penetrate extremely low-permeability faults or caprock formations. The CO<sub>2</sub> plumes under higher injection pressures are more constrained in the horizontal direction and hence appear thicker while CO<sub>2</sub> tends to spread out horizontally in conditions of low pressure. The impermeable fault renders the CO<sub>2</sub> plume about 200 m smaller in size horizontally. Assuming the presence of a fault with a highly permeable core causes leakage to occur after about 30 years of injection, which accounts for only 0.04% the injected amount. For the vertical-well injection case, the potential CO<sub>2</sub> leakage only accounts for around 0.28% of the injection amount, which is far less than the criterion (i.e., 2%) required to make GCS worthwhile. The storage capacities of the formations are mainly controlled by the depths and thicknesses since both their porosities and permeabilities are comparable. The formation Jiaowei-2 and Xiayang have the largest and second largest storage capacities, respectively, when using a fully perforated well for vertical injection. The average storage capacity of the studied site is 13.04 kg m<sup>−3</sup>, which is comparable to that of the formation Xiayang. Average injectivities of formations Jiaowei-2, Xiayang, Weizhou-1, and Weizhou-3 are 8.29 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, 1.75 × 10<sup>−4</sup>, 6.58 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, and 2.99 × 10<sup>−3</sup> kg s<sup>−1</sup> Pa<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. © 2022 The Authors. <i>Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology</i> published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地质碳储量(GCS)活动,特别是近海活动,在世界范围内仍然远远不够。南海北部沉积盆地被认为有利于近海地面军事系统的部署。本研究通过储层数值模拟研究了北部湾盆地北部凹陷魏西南凹陷的储层性能,该凹陷被认为是最有希望在含盐地层中进行CO2海上GCS的区域。对具有正断层的潜在地点的CO2注入的模拟表明,CO2水平注入引起的压力积聚可以穿透极低渗透断层或盖层。在更高的注入压力下,CO2羽流在水平方向上更受约束,因此看起来更厚,而在低压条件下,CO2倾向于水平扩散。不可渗透断层使CO2羽流在水平方向上缩小了约200米。假设存在具有高渗透性岩心的断层,则在注入约30年后会导致泄漏,这仅占注入量的0.04%。对于垂直井注入情况,潜在的CO2泄漏仅占注入量的0.28%左右,远低于使GCS有价值所需的标准(即2%)。地层的储存能力主要由深度和厚度控制,因为它们的孔隙率和渗透率都是可比的。采用全射孔井垂直注入时,焦尾-2组和夏阳组的储能分别为最大和第二大。研究场地的平均蓄水量为13.04 kg m−3,与夏阳组相当。焦卫2组、夏阳组、卫1组和卫3组的平均注入量分别为8.29×10−5、1.75×10−4、6.58×10−3和2.99×10–3 kg s−1 Pa−1。©2022作者。《温室气体:科学与技术》由化学工业协会和John Wiley&;儿子有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing a potential site for offshore CO2 storage in the Weixinan Sag in the northwestern Beibu Gulf Basin, northern South China Sea

Geologic carbon storage (GCS) activities, especially offshore, are still far insufficient worldwide. Sedimentary basins in the northern South China Sea (nSCS) are identified to be favorable to offshore GCS deployment. This study investigates by numerical reservoir simulations the performance of the Weixinan Sag in the northern depression of the Beibu Gulf Basin (BGB), which is considered the most promising area for CO2 offshore GCS in saline formations. Simulations of CO2 injection at a potential site with a normal fault indicate that the pressure buildup induced by CO2 horizontal injection could penetrate extremely low-permeability faults or caprock formations. The CO2 plumes under higher injection pressures are more constrained in the horizontal direction and hence appear thicker while CO2 tends to spread out horizontally in conditions of low pressure. The impermeable fault renders the CO2 plume about 200 m smaller in size horizontally. Assuming the presence of a fault with a highly permeable core causes leakage to occur after about 30 years of injection, which accounts for only 0.04% the injected amount. For the vertical-well injection case, the potential CO2 leakage only accounts for around 0.28% of the injection amount, which is far less than the criterion (i.e., 2%) required to make GCS worthwhile. The storage capacities of the formations are mainly controlled by the depths and thicknesses since both their porosities and permeabilities are comparable. The formation Jiaowei-2 and Xiayang have the largest and second largest storage capacities, respectively, when using a fully perforated well for vertical injection. The average storage capacity of the studied site is 13.04 kg m−3, which is comparable to that of the formation Xiayang. Average injectivities of formations Jiaowei-2, Xiayang, Weizhou-1, and Weizhou-3 are 8.29 × 10−5, 1.75 × 10−4, 6.58 × 10−5, and 2.99 × 10−3 kg s−1 Pa−1, respectively. © 2022 The Authors. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信