加剧不平等:新冠肺炎大流行期间对工作灵活性和家庭劳动分工的性别观念

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Rachel Rinaldo, Ian Michael Whalen
{"title":"加剧不平等:新冠肺炎大流行期间对工作灵活性和家庭劳动分工的性别观念","authors":"Rachel Rinaldo,&nbsp;Ian Michael Whalen","doi":"10.1111/gwao.13026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, mothers have taken on more of the responsibility for childcare (including remote schooling) and housework. How did dual-income couples negotiate domestic labor during the pandemic in ways that ended up with women taking on a larger role? Based on in-depth interviews with 33 parents, we found that men's jobs were often discussed as being more demanding, particularly in their need for protected time, or requiring rigid time commitments, while women's work was considered more flexible and able to accommodate childcare needs. We argue that gendered perceptions about the flexibility of paid work shaped couple's negotiations over the division of labor. While many interviewees considered men's jobs as “simply more demanding,” we propose that this is a gendered perception that reflects entrenched cultural norms that associate masculinity with paid work and thus men's paid work is prioritized in many families.</p>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amplifying inequalities: Gendered perceptions of work flexibility and the division of household labor during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Rinaldo,&nbsp;Ian Michael Whalen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwao.13026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, mothers have taken on more of the responsibility for childcare (including remote schooling) and housework. How did dual-income couples negotiate domestic labor during the pandemic in ways that ended up with women taking on a larger role? Based on in-depth interviews with 33 parents, we found that men's jobs were often discussed as being more demanding, particularly in their need for protected time, or requiring rigid time commitments, while women's work was considered more flexible and able to accommodate childcare needs. We argue that gendered perceptions about the flexibility of paid work shaped couple's negotiations over the division of labor. While many interviewees considered men's jobs as “simply more demanding,” we propose that this is a gendered perception that reflects entrenched cultural norms that associate masculinity with paid work and thus men's paid work is prioritized in many families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Work and Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Work and Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国新冠肺炎大流行期间,母亲承担了更多的育儿责任(包括远程教育)和家务。在疫情期间,双收入夫妇是如何协商家务劳动的,最终女性扮演了更大的角色?根据对33位父母的深入采访,我们发现男性的工作往往被认为要求更高,特别是在他们需要受保护的时间或需要严格的时间承诺方面,而女性的工作被认为更灵活,能够满足育儿需求。我们认为,对带薪工作灵活性的性别观念影响了夫妻双方关于分工的谈判。虽然许多受访者认为男性的工作“要求更高”,但我们认为,这是一种性别观念,反映了根深蒂固的文化规范,将男性气概与有偿工作联系在一起,因此男性的有偿工作在许多家庭中被优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amplifying inequalities: Gendered perceptions of work flexibility and the division of household labor during the COVID-19 pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, mothers have taken on more of the responsibility for childcare (including remote schooling) and housework. How did dual-income couples negotiate domestic labor during the pandemic in ways that ended up with women taking on a larger role? Based on in-depth interviews with 33 parents, we found that men's jobs were often discussed as being more demanding, particularly in their need for protected time, or requiring rigid time commitments, while women's work was considered more flexible and able to accommodate childcare needs. We argue that gendered perceptions about the flexibility of paid work shaped couple's negotiations over the division of labor. While many interviewees considered men's jobs as “simply more demanding,” we propose that this is a gendered perception that reflects entrenched cultural norms that associate masculinity with paid work and thus men's paid work is prioritized in many families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信