运动中的不确定性:关于巴尔的摩后期工业区代理权战争的传言

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
CHLOE AHMANN
{"title":"运动中的不确定性:关于巴尔的摩后期工业区代理权战争的传言","authors":"CHLOE AHMANN","doi":"10.14506/ca38.3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Until 2016, South Baltimoreans debated a proposed incinerator. Those debates were manifestly about local land use, but rumors spread that something else was really going on. Opponents supposed the plant was secretly owned by a power player in the waste-to-energy sector; supporters swore opponents must be bankrolled by Big Landfill. In short: a waste-industry proxy war was brewing in South Baltimore. I follow these rumors and argue that their persuasive power grew as they darted up, down, and back, forging a politics of connection across scales that made skilled use of fragmented information. On both sides of the issue, talk of outside influence worked to vest some voices with more authority than others. Tracking these claims across scales and through allegedly bad relations—in a place where corporations strive to disavow connections of all kinds and consign local knowledge to the realm of mere suspicion—I show how rumors of a proxy war became tools for mapping ambiguous forces long at play in this environment. More, by wielding doubt to do subversive work, rumors managed to draw local power from them.</p>","PeriodicalId":51423,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Anthropology","volume":"38 3","pages":"303-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.14506/ca38.3.01","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UNCERTAINTY IN MOTION: Rumors of a Proxy War in Late Industrial Baltimore\",\"authors\":\"CHLOE AHMANN\",\"doi\":\"10.14506/ca38.3.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Until 2016, South Baltimoreans debated a proposed incinerator. Those debates were manifestly about local land use, but rumors spread that something else was really going on. Opponents supposed the plant was secretly owned by a power player in the waste-to-energy sector; supporters swore opponents must be bankrolled by Big Landfill. In short: a waste-industry proxy war was brewing in South Baltimore. I follow these rumors and argue that their persuasive power grew as they darted up, down, and back, forging a politics of connection across scales that made skilled use of fragmented information. On both sides of the issue, talk of outside influence worked to vest some voices with more authority than others. Tracking these claims across scales and through allegedly bad relations—in a place where corporations strive to disavow connections of all kinds and consign local knowledge to the realm of mere suspicion—I show how rumors of a proxy war became tools for mapping ambiguous forces long at play in this environment. More, by wielding doubt to do subversive work, rumors managed to draw local power from them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"303-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.14506/ca38.3.01\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14506/ca38.3.01\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14506/ca38.3.01","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到2016年,南巴尔的摩人一直在讨论拟议中的焚烧炉。这些争论显然是关于当地土地使用的,但有传言称确实发生了其他事情。反对者认为该工厂是由废物转化能源行业的一家电力公司秘密拥有的;支持者发誓反对者必须得到大垃圾填埋场的资助。简言之:巴尔的摩南部正在酝酿一场废物行业代理人战争。我关注这些谣言,并认为它们的说服力随着它们的上下起伏而增强,形成了一种跨尺度的联系政治,熟练地利用零散的信息。在问题的双方,谈论外部影响使一些声音比其他声音更有权威。在一个企业努力否认各种关系,并将当地知识置于怀疑的领域的地方,通过跨规模和所谓的不良关系来追踪这些说法,我展示了代理战争的谣言是如何成为映射在这种环境中长期存在的模糊力量的工具的。更重要的是,通过利用怀疑进行颠覆性的工作,谣言成功地从中汲取了当地的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

UNCERTAINTY IN MOTION: Rumors of a Proxy War in Late Industrial Baltimore

UNCERTAINTY IN MOTION: Rumors of a Proxy War in Late Industrial Baltimore

Until 2016, South Baltimoreans debated a proposed incinerator. Those debates were manifestly about local land use, but rumors spread that something else was really going on. Opponents supposed the plant was secretly owned by a power player in the waste-to-energy sector; supporters swore opponents must be bankrolled by Big Landfill. In short: a waste-industry proxy war was brewing in South Baltimore. I follow these rumors and argue that their persuasive power grew as they darted up, down, and back, forging a politics of connection across scales that made skilled use of fragmented information. On both sides of the issue, talk of outside influence worked to vest some voices with more authority than others. Tracking these claims across scales and through allegedly bad relations—in a place where corporations strive to disavow connections of all kinds and consign local knowledge to the realm of mere suspicion—I show how rumors of a proxy war became tools for mapping ambiguous forces long at play in this environment. More, by wielding doubt to do subversive work, rumors managed to draw local power from them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Anthropology
Cultural Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Cultural Anthropology publishes ethnographic writing informed by a wide array of theoretical perspectives, innovative in form and content, and focused on both traditional and emerging topics. It also welcomes essays concerned with ethnographic methods and research design in historical perspective, and with ways cultural analysis can address broader public audiences and interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信