识别和描述参与整个欧洲作物多样化经验的行动者之间的关系

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Marie-Aline Cornu, Rebekka Frick, Iman Raj Chongtham, Ileana Iocola, Stefano Canali, Luca Colombo, Paweł Radzikowski, Jarosław Stalenga, Loïc Viguier, Dóra Drexler, Anne Schneider, Didier Stilmant, Frédéric M. Vanwindekens
{"title":"识别和描述参与整个欧洲作物多样化经验的行动者之间的关系","authors":"Marie-Aline Cornu,&nbsp;Rebekka Frick,&nbsp;Iman Raj Chongtham,&nbsp;Ileana Iocola,&nbsp;Stefano Canali,&nbsp;Luca Colombo,&nbsp;Paweł Radzikowski,&nbsp;Jarosław Stalenga,&nbsp;Loïc Viguier,&nbsp;Dóra Drexler,&nbsp;Anne Schneider,&nbsp;Didier Stilmant,&nbsp;Frédéric M. Vanwindekens","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agriculture can benefit from crop diversification to facilitate its transition to more sustainable agrifood systems. However, these practices remain rare in Europe. One major barrier is the existence of sociotechnical lock-ins. To clarify the dynamics at work, we analyzed the relationships between actors involved in 23 crop diversification experiences across 11 European countries. The novelty of this paper lies in the systemic analysis of the network of actors involved in crop diversification experiences. Using data from qualitative interviews and cognitive mapping approaches, we identify and describe the role of actors and the key relationships in crop diversification and detect relationships that are currently missing. Our study shows that in the different European countries, similar relationships act as levers or barriers to crop diversification, with farmers and researchers playing a crucial role. The most important cognitive factors that influence the choice of farmers to diversify are environmental and health concerns and the desire to make profit and innovate. We relate the cognitive factors to organizational, technical, economic, and political factors and suggest levers for crop diversification based on successful crop diversification experiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification and description of relationships between actors involved in crop diversification experiences across Europe\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Aline Cornu,&nbsp;Rebekka Frick,&nbsp;Iman Raj Chongtham,&nbsp;Ileana Iocola,&nbsp;Stefano Canali,&nbsp;Luca Colombo,&nbsp;Paweł Radzikowski,&nbsp;Jarosław Stalenga,&nbsp;Loïc Viguier,&nbsp;Dóra Drexler,&nbsp;Anne Schneider,&nbsp;Didier Stilmant,&nbsp;Frédéric M. Vanwindekens\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Agriculture can benefit from crop diversification to facilitate its transition to more sustainable agrifood systems. However, these practices remain rare in Europe. One major barrier is the existence of sociotechnical lock-ins. To clarify the dynamics at work, we analyzed the relationships between actors involved in 23 crop diversification experiences across 11 European countries. The novelty of this paper lies in the systemic analysis of the network of actors involved in crop diversification experiences. Using data from qualitative interviews and cognitive mapping approaches, we identify and describe the role of actors and the key relationships in crop diversification and detect relationships that are currently missing. Our study shows that in the different European countries, similar relationships act as levers or barriers to crop diversification, with farmers and researchers playing a crucial role. The most important cognitive factors that influence the choice of farmers to diversify are environmental and health concerns and the desire to make profit and innovate. We relate the cognitive factors to organizational, technical, economic, and political factors and suggest levers for crop diversification based on successful crop diversification experiences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业可以从作物多样化中受益,以促进其向更可持续的农业粮食系统过渡。然而,这些做法在欧洲仍然很少见。一个主要的障碍是社会技术束缚的存在。为了澄清工作中的动态,我们分析了11个欧洲国家23种作物多样化经验中参与者之间的关系。本文的新颖之处在于系统地分析了参与作物多样化经验的行动者网络。利用定性访谈和认知映射方法的数据,我们确定和描述了行为者的角色和作物多样化中的关键关系,并检测了目前缺失的关系。我们的研究表明,在不同的欧洲国家,类似的关系作为作物多样化的杠杆或障碍,农民和研究人员起着至关重要的作用。影响农民选择多样化的最重要的认知因素是环境和健康问题以及盈利和创新的愿望。我们将认知因素与组织、技术、经济和政治因素联系起来,并根据成功的作物多样化经验提出作物多样化的杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identification and description of relationships between actors involved in crop diversification experiences across Europe

Identification and description of relationships between actors involved in crop diversification experiences across Europe

Agriculture can benefit from crop diversification to facilitate its transition to more sustainable agrifood systems. However, these practices remain rare in Europe. One major barrier is the existence of sociotechnical lock-ins. To clarify the dynamics at work, we analyzed the relationships between actors involved in 23 crop diversification experiences across 11 European countries. The novelty of this paper lies in the systemic analysis of the network of actors involved in crop diversification experiences. Using data from qualitative interviews and cognitive mapping approaches, we identify and describe the role of actors and the key relationships in crop diversification and detect relationships that are currently missing. Our study shows that in the different European countries, similar relationships act as levers or barriers to crop diversification, with farmers and researchers playing a crucial role. The most important cognitive factors that influence the choice of farmers to diversify are environmental and health concerns and the desire to make profit and innovate. We relate the cognitive factors to organizational, technical, economic, and political factors and suggest levers for crop diversification based on successful crop diversification experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信