尼日利亚家庭粮食不安全和烹饪能源获取:面板数据方法

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Adegbenga Emmanuel Adekoya , Adeola Festus Adenikinju , Olusanya Elisa Olubusoye , Oluwaseun Asola Oyeranti , Oluwaseun Aramide Otekunrin , Iredele Emmanuel Ogunbayo , Benjamin Olusegun Oyelami , Temilade Sesan , Olufunke Alaba , Oreoluwa Ibukun Akano
{"title":"尼日利亚家庭粮食不安全和烹饪能源获取:面板数据方法","authors":"Adegbenga Emmanuel Adekoya ,&nbsp;Adeola Festus Adenikinju ,&nbsp;Olusanya Elisa Olubusoye ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Asola Oyeranti ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Aramide Otekunrin ,&nbsp;Iredele Emmanuel Ogunbayo ,&nbsp;Benjamin Olusegun Oyelami ,&nbsp;Temilade Sesan ,&nbsp;Olufunke Alaba ,&nbsp;Oreoluwa Ibukun Akano","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Access to sources of cooking energy has potential impacts on food security, however, there is a paucity of information and empirical evidence on their linkages. This study sought to ascertain the impacts of access to cooking energy on household food security in Nigeria, using the nationally representative Living Standards Measurement Study data. The data covered the period 2010/2011 to 2015/2016. The Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) were used to measure household food security, while the major cooking fuel type utilized by households was used as a proxy for cooking energy access. To unravel the effects of access to different cooking energy sources on food security, inferential analysis was conducted using the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The findings of the study revealed that traditional/biomass (firewood, grass and charcoal) cooking energy sources are still widely used by households across Nigeria. The empirical analysis showed that households that use transition and clean cooking energy sources were eating more diverse diets than those that use biomass. Furthermore, households using clean cooking energy sources had lower HFIAS than those using biomass. It is imperative that more households in Nigeria should have improved access to cleaner sources of cooking energy to reduce carbon emissions and enhance health outcomes, and food and nutrition status. This will significantly improve the national food security outlook, and foster the attainment of national and SDG (2 and 7) goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household food insecurity and cooking energy access in Nigeria: A panel data approach\",\"authors\":\"Adegbenga Emmanuel Adekoya ,&nbsp;Adeola Festus Adenikinju ,&nbsp;Olusanya Elisa Olubusoye ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Asola Oyeranti ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Aramide Otekunrin ,&nbsp;Iredele Emmanuel Ogunbayo ,&nbsp;Benjamin Olusegun Oyelami ,&nbsp;Temilade Sesan ,&nbsp;Olufunke Alaba ,&nbsp;Oreoluwa Ibukun Akano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Access to sources of cooking energy has potential impacts on food security, however, there is a paucity of information and empirical evidence on their linkages. This study sought to ascertain the impacts of access to cooking energy on household food security in Nigeria, using the nationally representative Living Standards Measurement Study data. The data covered the period 2010/2011 to 2015/2016. The Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) were used to measure household food security, while the major cooking fuel type utilized by households was used as a proxy for cooking energy access. To unravel the effects of access to different cooking energy sources on food security, inferential analysis was conducted using the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The findings of the study revealed that traditional/biomass (firewood, grass and charcoal) cooking energy sources are still widely used by households across Nigeria. The empirical analysis showed that households that use transition and clean cooking energy sources were eating more diverse diets than those that use biomass. Furthermore, households using clean cooking energy sources had lower HFIAS than those using biomass. It is imperative that more households in Nigeria should have improved access to cleaner sources of cooking energy to reduce carbon emissions and enhance health outcomes, and food and nutrition status. This will significantly improve the national food security outlook, and foster the attainment of national and SDG (2 and 7) goals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy nexus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy nexus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

获得烹饪能源对粮食安全有潜在影响,但缺乏关于它们之间联系的信息和经验证据。这项研究试图利用具有全国代表性的生活水平衡量研究数据,确定获得烹饪能源对尼日利亚家庭粮食安全的影响。数据涵盖了2010/2011年至2015/2016年期间。家庭饮食多样性评分(HDDS)和家庭粮食不安全获取量表(HFIAS)用于衡量家庭粮食安全,而家庭使用的主要烹饪燃料类型则用作烹饪能源获取的指标。为了揭示获得不同烹饪能源对粮食安全的影响,使用广义估计方程(GEE)进行了推断分析。研究结果表明,尼日利亚各地的家庭仍然广泛使用传统/生物质(木柴、草和木炭)烹饪能源。实证分析表明,使用转型和清洁烹饪能源的家庭比使用生物质的家庭饮食更加多样化。此外,使用清洁烹饪能源的家庭的HFIAS低于使用生物质的家庭。尼日利亚必须让更多的家庭更好地获得更清洁的烹饪能源,以减少碳排放,改善健康状况以及食品和营养状况。这将大大改善国家粮食安全前景,促进实现国家和可持续发展目标(2和7)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Household food insecurity and cooking energy access in Nigeria: A panel data approach

Access to sources of cooking energy has potential impacts on food security, however, there is a paucity of information and empirical evidence on their linkages. This study sought to ascertain the impacts of access to cooking energy on household food security in Nigeria, using the nationally representative Living Standards Measurement Study data. The data covered the period 2010/2011 to 2015/2016. The Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) were used to measure household food security, while the major cooking fuel type utilized by households was used as a proxy for cooking energy access. To unravel the effects of access to different cooking energy sources on food security, inferential analysis was conducted using the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The findings of the study revealed that traditional/biomass (firewood, grass and charcoal) cooking energy sources are still widely used by households across Nigeria. The empirical analysis showed that households that use transition and clean cooking energy sources were eating more diverse diets than those that use biomass. Furthermore, households using clean cooking energy sources had lower HFIAS than those using biomass. It is imperative that more households in Nigeria should have improved access to cleaner sources of cooking energy to reduce carbon emissions and enhance health outcomes, and food and nutrition status. This will significantly improve the national food security outlook, and foster the attainment of national and SDG (2 and 7) goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信