长期护理需求和退休储蓄

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Jesús Bueren
{"title":"长期护理需求和退休储蓄","authors":"Jesús Bueren","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2022.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, I investigate to what extent heterogeneity in both long-term care (LTC) needs and informal care support affects the savings decisions of the old. For this purpose, I develop and estimate a model of retired single individuals where agents are exposed to physical and/or cognitive health deterioration that triggers demand for LTC. To cope with LTC, agents differ in the amount of informal care provided by relatives and can purchase formal care at a market price to supplement this. I find that (i) LTC is relatively more important than bequest motives in explaining the lack of dissaving of individuals with limited access to informal care, (ii) concurrent cognitive and physical limitations account for most of the precautionary savings related to LTC, and (iii) Abstracting from informal care provision from relatives overestimates the welfare gains from expansions in government-provided means-tested care programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47890,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Dynamics","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 201-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term care needs and savings in retirement\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Bueren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.red.2022.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, I investigate to what extent heterogeneity in both long-term care (LTC) needs and informal care support affects the savings decisions of the old. For this purpose, I develop and estimate a model of retired single individuals where agents are exposed to physical and/or cognitive health deterioration that triggers demand for LTC. To cope with LTC, agents differ in the amount of informal care provided by relatives and can purchase formal care at a market price to supplement this. I find that (i) LTC is relatively more important than bequest motives in explaining the lack of dissaving of individuals with limited access to informal care, (ii) concurrent cognitive and physical limitations account for most of the precautionary savings related to LTC, and (iii) Abstracting from informal care provision from relatives overestimates the welfare gains from expansions in government-provided means-tested care programs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Economic Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 201-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Economic Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109420252200045X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109420252200045X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我研究了长期护理(LTC)需求和非正式护理支持的异质性在多大程度上影响老年人的储蓄决策。为此,我开发并估计了一个退休单身个体的模型,其中代理人暴露于身体和/或认知健康恶化,从而引发对LTC的需求。为了应对长期护理,代理人在亲属提供的非正式护理的数量上有所不同,并可以以市场价格购买正式护理来补充这一点。我发现(I)长期储蓄比遗产动机更能解释获得非正式护理机会有限的个人缺乏储蓄,(ii)同时存在的认知和身体限制解释了与长期储蓄相关的大部分预防性储蓄,以及(iii)从亲属提供的非正式护理中抽身,高估了政府提供的经经济状况调查的护理计划的扩大所带来的福利收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term care needs and savings in retirement

In this paper, I investigate to what extent heterogeneity in both long-term care (LTC) needs and informal care support affects the savings decisions of the old. For this purpose, I develop and estimate a model of retired single individuals where agents are exposed to physical and/or cognitive health deterioration that triggers demand for LTC. To cope with LTC, agents differ in the amount of informal care provided by relatives and can purchase formal care at a market price to supplement this. I find that (i) LTC is relatively more important than bequest motives in explaining the lack of dissaving of individuals with limited access to informal care, (ii) concurrent cognitive and physical limitations account for most of the precautionary savings related to LTC, and (iii) Abstracting from informal care provision from relatives overestimates the welfare gains from expansions in government-provided means-tested care programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Review of Economic Dynamics publishes meritorious original contributions to dynamic economics. The scope of the journal is intended to be broad and to reflect the view of the Society for Economic Dynamics that the field of economics is unified by the scientific approach to economics. We will publish contributions in any area of economics provided they meet the highest standards of scientific research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信