机器学习!对土木和环境工程问题的自动化,可解释和无编码平台进行基准测试

M.Z. Naser
{"title":"机器学习!对土木和环境工程问题的自动化,可解释和无编码平台进行基准测试","authors":"M.Z. Naser","doi":"10.1016/j.iintel.2023.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the key challenges in fully embracing machine learning (ML) in civil and environmental engineering revolves around the need for coding (or programming) experience and for acquiring ML-related infrastructure. This barrier can be overcome through the availability of various platforms that provide automated and coding-free ML services, as well as ML infrastructure (in the form of a cloud service or software). Thus, engineers can now adopt, create, and apply ML to tackle various problems with ease and little coding. From this view, this paper presents a comparison of five automated and coding-free ML platforms: <em>BigML</em>, <em>Dataiku</em>, <em>DataRobot</em>, <em>Exploratory</em>, and <em>RapidMiner</em> on civil and environmental engineering problems. This comparison shows that although these platforms differ in their setup, services, and provided ML algorithms, all platforms performed adequately and comparably well to each other and to coding-based ML analyses. These findings denote the usefulness of coding-free ML platforms, which can lead to a brighter future for ML integration into our domain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100791,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning for all! Benchmarking automated, explainable, and coding-free platforms on civil and environmental engineering problems\",\"authors\":\"M.Z. Naser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iintel.2023.100028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>One of the key challenges in fully embracing machine learning (ML) in civil and environmental engineering revolves around the need for coding (or programming) experience and for acquiring ML-related infrastructure. This barrier can be overcome through the availability of various platforms that provide automated and coding-free ML services, as well as ML infrastructure (in the form of a cloud service or software). Thus, engineers can now adopt, create, and apply ML to tackle various problems with ease and little coding. From this view, this paper presents a comparison of five automated and coding-free ML platforms: <em>BigML</em>, <em>Dataiku</em>, <em>DataRobot</em>, <em>Exploratory</em>, and <em>RapidMiner</em> on civil and environmental engineering problems. This comparison shows that although these platforms differ in their setup, services, and provided ML algorithms, all platforms performed adequately and comparably well to each other and to coding-based ML analyses. These findings denote the usefulness of coding-free ML platforms, which can lead to a brighter future for ML integration into our domain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772991523000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772991523000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在土木和环境工程中全面采用机器学习(ML)的关键挑战之一是需要编码(或编程)经验和获取与ML相关的基础设施。这一障碍可以通过各种平台的可用性来克服,这些平台提供自动化和无编码的ML服务,以及ML基础设施(以云服务或软件的形式)。因此,工程师现在可以采用、创建和应用机器学习来轻松解决各种问题,并且只需编写很少的代码。从这个角度来看,本文比较了五个自动化和无编码的ML平台:BigML, Dataiku, datarrobot, Exploratory和RapidMiner在土木和环境工程问题上的应用。这一比较表明,尽管这些平台在设置、服务和提供的ML算法方面有所不同,但所有平台在相互之间和基于编码的ML分析方面都表现得相当好。这些发现表明无编码机器学习平台的有用性,这可以为机器学习集成到我们的领域带来更光明的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning for all! Benchmarking automated, explainable, and coding-free platforms on civil and environmental engineering problems

One of the key challenges in fully embracing machine learning (ML) in civil and environmental engineering revolves around the need for coding (or programming) experience and for acquiring ML-related infrastructure. This barrier can be overcome through the availability of various platforms that provide automated and coding-free ML services, as well as ML infrastructure (in the form of a cloud service or software). Thus, engineers can now adopt, create, and apply ML to tackle various problems with ease and little coding. From this view, this paper presents a comparison of five automated and coding-free ML platforms: BigML, Dataiku, DataRobot, Exploratory, and RapidMiner on civil and environmental engineering problems. This comparison shows that although these platforms differ in their setup, services, and provided ML algorithms, all platforms performed adequately and comparably well to each other and to coding-based ML analyses. These findings denote the usefulness of coding-free ML platforms, which can lead to a brighter future for ML integration into our domain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信