肌瘤治疗的争议

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
M. Gracia , J. Isern Quitllet
{"title":"肌瘤治疗的争议","authors":"M. Gracia ,&nbsp;J. Isern Quitllet","doi":"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Uterine fibroids are the most common tumours in women of reproductive age, but only 25% of women will require treatment due to the presence of symptoms. There are few randomised studies that have compared the different treatment options for uterine myoma; for the moment, surgery remains the option that offers the best rates of symptomatic resolution, improved quality of life, and a lower recurrence rate. Despite the widespread use of myoma surgery, it seems reasonable to believe that by reducing surgical treatments, either with less invasive therapies or with new medical treatments, both associated morbidity and costs would be reduced. In this sense, ablative techniques for myoma treatment, UAE, HIFU, and radiofrequency, have demonstrated results in terms of symptomatic control and quality of life comparable to surgery, with a low rate of major complications. Recurrence rates and the impact on patients’ future fertility would be the main concern. Future long-term comparative studies of ablative techniques and surgical approaches are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41294,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversias en el tratamiento de los miomas\",\"authors\":\"M. Gracia ,&nbsp;J. Isern Quitllet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Uterine fibroids are the most common tumours in women of reproductive age, but only 25% of women will require treatment due to the presence of symptoms. There are few randomised studies that have compared the different treatment options for uterine myoma; for the moment, surgery remains the option that offers the best rates of symptomatic resolution, improved quality of life, and a lower recurrence rate. Despite the widespread use of myoma surgery, it seems reasonable to believe that by reducing surgical treatments, either with less invasive therapies or with new medical treatments, both associated morbidity and costs would be reduced. In this sense, ablative techniques for myoma treatment, UAE, HIFU, and radiofrequency, have demonstrated results in terms of symptomatic control and quality of life comparable to surgery, with a low rate of major complications. Recurrence rates and the impact on patients’ future fertility would be the main concern. Future long-term comparative studies of ablative techniques and surgical approaches are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X23000242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X23000242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

子宫肌瘤是育龄妇女最常见的肿瘤,但只有25%的妇女因出现症状而需要治疗。很少有随机研究比较子宫肌瘤的不同治疗方案;目前,手术仍然是一种能提供最佳症状缓解率、改善生活质量和降低复发率的选择。尽管肌瘤手术得到了广泛应用,但似乎有理由相信,通过减少手术治疗,无论是微创治疗还是新的医疗治疗,相关的发病率和成本都会降低。从这个意义上说,子宫肌瘤治疗的消融技术,阿联酋,高强度聚焦超声和射频治疗,在症状控制和生活质量方面已经证明了与手术相当的效果,主要并发症发生率较低。复发率和对患者未来生育能力的影响将是主要关注的问题。未来需要对消融技术和手术方法进行长期的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversias en el tratamiento de los miomas

Uterine fibroids are the most common tumours in women of reproductive age, but only 25% of women will require treatment due to the presence of symptoms. There are few randomised studies that have compared the different treatment options for uterine myoma; for the moment, surgery remains the option that offers the best rates of symptomatic resolution, improved quality of life, and a lower recurrence rate. Despite the widespread use of myoma surgery, it seems reasonable to believe that by reducing surgical treatments, either with less invasive therapies or with new medical treatments, both associated morbidity and costs would be reduced. In this sense, ablative techniques for myoma treatment, UAE, HIFU, and radiofrequency, have demonstrated results in terms of symptomatic control and quality of life comparable to surgery, with a low rate of major complications. Recurrence rates and the impact on patients’ future fertility would be the main concern. Future long-term comparative studies of ablative techniques and surgical approaches are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Una excelente publicación para mantenerse al día en los temas de máximo interés de la ginecología de vanguardia. Resulta idónea tanto para el especialista en ginecología, como en obstetricia o en pediatría, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信