评估IOTA-ADNEX模型在我们三级医院中心鉴别附件肿块中的应用,同时考虑患者的更年期状况。五年经验

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
N. Elsner Hernández , J.F. De Luis Escudero , L.I. Pérez Méndez , D.R. Báez Quintana , E. Bruno Santana , J.A. Pérez Álvarez , N.R. Sierra Medina , C. Chulilla Pérez , A. Quesada López-Fe
{"title":"评估IOTA-ADNEX模型在我们三级医院中心鉴别附件肿块中的应用,同时考虑患者的更年期状况。五年经验","authors":"N. Elsner Hernández ,&nbsp;J.F. De Luis Escudero ,&nbsp;L.I. Pérez Méndez ,&nbsp;D.R. Báez Quintana ,&nbsp;E. Bruno Santana ,&nbsp;J.A. Pérez Álvarez ,&nbsp;N.R. Sierra Medina ,&nbsp;C. Chulilla Pérez ,&nbsp;A. Quesada López-Fe","doi":"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objectives were to estimate the performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model test after its incorporation into the ultrasound tests of our third-grade hospital gynecology service, as well as to assess whether its capacity of accuracy is modified when taking into account the patient's menopausal status.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted to clinically evaluate the diagnostic performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model test, which was performed between January 2016 and December 2021. The study included 573 women with an adnexal injury who underwent surgical excision within 180 days after ultrasound diagnosis and histological confirmation (gold standard). After the ultrasound exam, the injuries were classified using the ADNEX model. The study estimated the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of the ADNEX model for classifying between benign and malignant adnexal masses and compared the performance by menopausal state. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for different cut-off points.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 573 women, 183 (31.9%) had a malignant tumor. The AUC of the ADNEX model for differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses at the time of ultrasound examination was 0.92 and the best malignancy threshold, detected by Youden index, was 22.5%. At this cut-off, the sensitivity of the ADNEX model was 91.8% and the specificity was 76.4%. However, it varies according to menopausal status: in the group of pre-menopausal patient, sensitivity was 86.1% (95% CI, 85.4%–86.8%) and specificity was 81.3% (95% CI, 85.4%–86.8%). In the postmenopausal group, sensitivity was 96.1% (95% CI, 95.6%–96.7%) and specificity was 68.5% (95% CI, 68.1%–68.8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The IOTA-ADNEX model is a reliable diagnostic tool to discard ovarian cancer. However, the accuracy of the test, at the same cut-off point, varies according to the menopausal state of the patient so it may be important to take it into account when taking decisions in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41294,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 100910"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the incorporation of an IOTA-ADNEX model in the discrimination of adnexal masses in our third-level hospital centre, taking into account the menopausal status of patients. Five years of experience\",\"authors\":\"N. Elsner Hernández ,&nbsp;J.F. De Luis Escudero ,&nbsp;L.I. Pérez Méndez ,&nbsp;D.R. Báez Quintana ,&nbsp;E. Bruno Santana ,&nbsp;J.A. Pérez Álvarez ,&nbsp;N.R. Sierra Medina ,&nbsp;C. Chulilla Pérez ,&nbsp;A. Quesada López-Fe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objectives were to estimate the performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model test after its incorporation into the ultrasound tests of our third-grade hospital gynecology service, as well as to assess whether its capacity of accuracy is modified when taking into account the patient's menopausal status.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted to clinically evaluate the diagnostic performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model test, which was performed between January 2016 and December 2021. The study included 573 women with an adnexal injury who underwent surgical excision within 180 days after ultrasound diagnosis and histological confirmation (gold standard). After the ultrasound exam, the injuries were classified using the ADNEX model. The study estimated the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of the ADNEX model for classifying between benign and malignant adnexal masses and compared the performance by menopausal state. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for different cut-off points.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 573 women, 183 (31.9%) had a malignant tumor. The AUC of the ADNEX model for differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses at the time of ultrasound examination was 0.92 and the best malignancy threshold, detected by Youden index, was 22.5%. At this cut-off, the sensitivity of the ADNEX model was 91.8% and the specificity was 76.4%. However, it varies according to menopausal status: in the group of pre-menopausal patient, sensitivity was 86.1% (95% CI, 85.4%–86.8%) and specificity was 81.3% (95% CI, 85.4%–86.8%). In the postmenopausal group, sensitivity was 96.1% (95% CI, 95.6%–96.7%) and specificity was 68.5% (95% CI, 68.1%–68.8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The IOTA-ADNEX model is a reliable diagnostic tool to discard ovarian cancer. However, the accuracy of the test, at the same cut-off point, varies according to the menopausal state of the patient so it may be important to take it into account when taking decisions in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X23000801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X23000801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估IOTA-ADNEX模型测试在纳入我们三级医院妇科服务的超声测试后的性能,并评估其准确性是否在考虑患者的更年期状态时发生了变化。方法进行横断面研究,以临床评估IOTA-ADNEX模型试验的诊断性能,该试验于2016年1月至2021年12月进行。这项研究包括573名附件损伤的女性,她们在超声诊断和组织学确认(金标准)后180天内接受了手术切除。超声检查后,使用ADNEX模型对损伤进行分类。该研究估计了ADNEX模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),用于区分良性和恶性附件肿块,并比较了更年期状态的表现。测定不同分界点的敏感性和特异性。结果573名女性中,183名(31.9%)患有恶性肿瘤。ADNEX模型在超声检查时区分良性和恶性附件肿块的AUC为0.92,Youden指数检测到的最佳恶性阈值为22.5%。在这个临界点上,ADNEX模式的敏感性为91.8%,特异性为76.4%。然而,它根据更年期状态而变化:在绝经前患者组中,敏感性为86.1%(95%可信区间,85.4%-86.8%),特异性为81.3%(95%可信范围,85.4%-86.8%),绝经后组的敏感性为96.1%(95%置信区间,95.6%-96.7%),特异度为68.5%(95%置信范围,68.1%-68.8%)。然而,在同一临界点上,测试的准确性因患者的更年期状态而异,因此在临床实践中做出决定时将其考虑在内可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the incorporation of an IOTA-ADNEX model in the discrimination of adnexal masses in our third-level hospital centre, taking into account the menopausal status of patients. Five years of experience

Objective

The objectives were to estimate the performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model test after its incorporation into the ultrasound tests of our third-grade hospital gynecology service, as well as to assess whether its capacity of accuracy is modified when taking into account the patient's menopausal status.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted to clinically evaluate the diagnostic performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model test, which was performed between January 2016 and December 2021. The study included 573 women with an adnexal injury who underwent surgical excision within 180 days after ultrasound diagnosis and histological confirmation (gold standard). After the ultrasound exam, the injuries were classified using the ADNEX model. The study estimated the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of the ADNEX model for classifying between benign and malignant adnexal masses and compared the performance by menopausal state. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for different cut-off points.

Results

Out of the 573 women, 183 (31.9%) had a malignant tumor. The AUC of the ADNEX model for differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses at the time of ultrasound examination was 0.92 and the best malignancy threshold, detected by Youden index, was 22.5%. At this cut-off, the sensitivity of the ADNEX model was 91.8% and the specificity was 76.4%. However, it varies according to menopausal status: in the group of pre-menopausal patient, sensitivity was 86.1% (95% CI, 85.4%–86.8%) and specificity was 81.3% (95% CI, 85.4%–86.8%). In the postmenopausal group, sensitivity was 96.1% (95% CI, 95.6%–96.7%) and specificity was 68.5% (95% CI, 68.1%–68.8%).

Conclusions

The IOTA-ADNEX model is a reliable diagnostic tool to discard ovarian cancer. However, the accuracy of the test, at the same cut-off point, varies according to the menopausal state of the patient so it may be important to take it into account when taking decisions in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Una excelente publicación para mantenerse al día en los temas de máximo interés de la ginecología de vanguardia. Resulta idónea tanto para el especialista en ginecología, como en obstetricia o en pediatría, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信