教师的沟通风格是学生热情和奉献精神的预测因素

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zuleica Ruiz-Alfonso , Lidia E. Santana-Vega , Robert J. Vallerand
{"title":"教师的沟通风格是学生热情和奉献精神的预测因素","authors":"Zuleica Ruiz-Alfonso ,&nbsp;Lidia E. Santana-Vega ,&nbsp;Robert J. Vallerand","doi":"10.1016/j.psicod.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to analyse the relations between three different communicative teaching styles (gain-framing, loss-framing and amotivational style) and students’ passion and dedication to study after school hours. We recruited 407 students and data was evaluated through path analyses. Results showed that teachers’ communicative style that encouraged students to engage in an activity, highlighting the benefits of this engagement (gain-framing style), positively predicted students’ passion; teachers’ communicative style that emphasised the importance of avoiding failure and the cost of not being engaged in the activity (loss-framing style) negatively predicted students’ passion; teachers’ communicative style that underlined that there were no connections between students’ behaviour and the results they obtained in class (amotivational framing style) was not related to students’ passion. In turn, students’ passion strongly predicted their dedication to study. Additionally, passion mediated the relation between teachers’ communicative style and students’ dedication. Findings evidence, for the first time in the literature, the effect of different teachers’ communicative styles on students’ passion and dedication. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for the academic context and educational practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46733,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicodidactica","volume":"28 1","pages":"Pages 19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El estilo comunicativo del profesorado como predictor de la pasión y dedicación del alumnado\",\"authors\":\"Zuleica Ruiz-Alfonso ,&nbsp;Lidia E. Santana-Vega ,&nbsp;Robert J. Vallerand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psicod.2022.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to analyse the relations between three different communicative teaching styles (gain-framing, loss-framing and amotivational style) and students’ passion and dedication to study after school hours. We recruited 407 students and data was evaluated through path analyses. Results showed that teachers’ communicative style that encouraged students to engage in an activity, highlighting the benefits of this engagement (gain-framing style), positively predicted students’ passion; teachers’ communicative style that emphasised the importance of avoiding failure and the cost of not being engaged in the activity (loss-framing style) negatively predicted students’ passion; teachers’ communicative style that underlined that there were no connections between students’ behaviour and the results they obtained in class (amotivational framing style) was not related to students’ passion. In turn, students’ passion strongly predicted their dedication to study. Additionally, passion mediated the relation between teachers’ communicative style and students’ dedication. Findings evidence, for the first time in the literature, the effect of different teachers’ communicative styles on students’ passion and dedication. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for the academic context and educational practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103422000338\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicodidactica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103422000338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是分析三种不同的交际教学风格(获得框架、损失框架和动机风格)与学生放学后对学习的热情和献身精神之间的关系。我们招募了407名学生,并通过路径分析对数据进行了评估。结果表明,教师的交际风格鼓励学生参与一项活动,突出了这种参与的好处(增益框架风格),正向预测了学生的激情;强调避免失败的重要性和不参与活动的代价的教师沟通风格(损失框架风格)对学生的激情产生了负面预测;教师的交际风格强调学生的行为和他们在课堂上获得的结果之间没有联系(动机框架风格)与学生的激情无关。反过来,学生的热情强烈地预示着他们对学习的奉献。此外,激情在教师的交际风格和学生的奉献精神之间起着中介作用。研究结果首次在文献中证明了不同教师的交际风格对学生激情和奉献精神的影响。讨论结果对学术背景和教育实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El estilo comunicativo del profesorado como predictor de la pasión y dedicación del alumnado

The aim of this study was to analyse the relations between three different communicative teaching styles (gain-framing, loss-framing and amotivational style) and students’ passion and dedication to study after school hours. We recruited 407 students and data was evaluated through path analyses. Results showed that teachers’ communicative style that encouraged students to engage in an activity, highlighting the benefits of this engagement (gain-framing style), positively predicted students’ passion; teachers’ communicative style that emphasised the importance of avoiding failure and the cost of not being engaged in the activity (loss-framing style) negatively predicted students’ passion; teachers’ communicative style that underlined that there were no connections between students’ behaviour and the results they obtained in class (amotivational framing style) was not related to students’ passion. In turn, students’ passion strongly predicted their dedication to study. Additionally, passion mediated the relation between teachers’ communicative style and students’ dedication. Findings evidence, for the first time in the literature, the effect of different teachers’ communicative styles on students’ passion and dedication. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for the academic context and educational practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信