原行星盘中湍流的经验约束

IF 11.7 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Giovanni P. Rosotti
{"title":"原行星盘中湍流的经验约束","authors":"Giovanni P. Rosotti","doi":"10.1016/j.newar.2023.101674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Proto-planetary discs, the birth environment of planets, are an example of a structure commonly found in astrophysics, accretion discs. Identifying the mechanism responsible for accretion is a long-standing problem, dating back several decades. The common picture is that accretion is a consequence of turbulence, with several instabilities proposed for its origin. While traditionally this field used to be a purely theoretical endeavour, the landscape is now changing thanks mainly to new observational facilities such as the ALMA radio interferometer. Thanks to large improvements in spatial and spectral resolution and sensitivity (which have enabled the study of disc substructure, kinematics and surveys of large disc populations), multiple techniques have been devised to observationally measure the amount of turbulence in discs. This review summarises these techniques, ranging from attempts at direct detection of turbulence from line broadening, to more indirect approaches that rely on properties of the dust or consider the evolution of global disc properties (such as masses, radii and accretion rates) for large samples, and what their findings are. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that discs are in fact not as turbulent as thought one decade ago. On the other hand, direct detection of turbulence in some discs and the finite radial extent of dust substructures and in some cases the finite vertical extent strongly indicate that turbulence must be present at some level in proto-planetary discs. It is still an open question whether this amount of turbulence is enough to power accretion or if this is instead driven by other mechanisms, such as MHD winds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19718,"journal":{"name":"New Astronomy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical constraints on turbulence in proto-planetary discs\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni P. Rosotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.newar.2023.101674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Proto-planetary discs, the birth environment of planets, are an example of a structure commonly found in astrophysics, accretion discs. Identifying the mechanism responsible for accretion is a long-standing problem, dating back several decades. The common picture is that accretion is a consequence of turbulence, with several instabilities proposed for its origin. While traditionally this field used to be a purely theoretical endeavour, the landscape is now changing thanks mainly to new observational facilities such as the ALMA radio interferometer. Thanks to large improvements in spatial and spectral resolution and sensitivity (which have enabled the study of disc substructure, kinematics and surveys of large disc populations), multiple techniques have been devised to observationally measure the amount of turbulence in discs. This review summarises these techniques, ranging from attempts at direct detection of turbulence from line broadening, to more indirect approaches that rely on properties of the dust or consider the evolution of global disc properties (such as masses, radii and accretion rates) for large samples, and what their findings are. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that discs are in fact not as turbulent as thought one decade ago. On the other hand, direct detection of turbulence in some discs and the finite radial extent of dust substructures and in some cases the finite vertical extent strongly indicate that turbulence must be present at some level in proto-planetary discs. It is still an open question whether this amount of turbulence is enough to power accretion or if this is instead driven by other mechanisms, such as MHD winds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Astronomy Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Astronomy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387647323000027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Astronomy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387647323000027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

原行星盘是行星的诞生环境,是天体物理学中常见的吸积盘结构的一个例子。确定吸积的机制是一个长期存在的问题,可以追溯到几十年前。常见的情况是,吸积是湍流的结果,其起源有几个不稳定性。虽然传统上这一领域曾经是一项纯粹的理论研究,但现在的情况正在发生变化,这主要归功于ALMA无线电干涉仪等新的观测设施。由于空间和光谱分辨率以及灵敏度的大幅提高(这使得能够研究圆盘的亚结构、运动学和大型圆盘种群的调查),已经设计了多种技术来观测测量圆盘中的湍流量。这篇综述总结了这些技术,从直接检测湍流的尝试到线加宽,再到依赖尘埃特性或考虑大样本全局圆盘特性(如质量、半径和吸积率)演变的更间接的方法,以及它们的发现。多条证据表明,椎间盘实际上并不像十年前想象的那样动荡。另一方面,直接检测到一些圆盘中的湍流和尘埃子结构的有限径向范围,以及在某些情况下的有限垂直范围,强烈表明在原行星圆盘中一定存在某种程度的湍流。这一数量的湍流是否足以为吸积提供动力,或者是否由其他机制驱动,如MHD风,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical constraints on turbulence in proto-planetary discs

Proto-planetary discs, the birth environment of planets, are an example of a structure commonly found in astrophysics, accretion discs. Identifying the mechanism responsible for accretion is a long-standing problem, dating back several decades. The common picture is that accretion is a consequence of turbulence, with several instabilities proposed for its origin. While traditionally this field used to be a purely theoretical endeavour, the landscape is now changing thanks mainly to new observational facilities such as the ALMA radio interferometer. Thanks to large improvements in spatial and spectral resolution and sensitivity (which have enabled the study of disc substructure, kinematics and surveys of large disc populations), multiple techniques have been devised to observationally measure the amount of turbulence in discs. This review summarises these techniques, ranging from attempts at direct detection of turbulence from line broadening, to more indirect approaches that rely on properties of the dust or consider the evolution of global disc properties (such as masses, radii and accretion rates) for large samples, and what their findings are. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that discs are in fact not as turbulent as thought one decade ago. On the other hand, direct detection of turbulence in some discs and the finite radial extent of dust substructures and in some cases the finite vertical extent strongly indicate that turbulence must be present at some level in proto-planetary discs. It is still an open question whether this amount of turbulence is enough to power accretion or if this is instead driven by other mechanisms, such as MHD winds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Astronomy Reviews
New Astronomy Reviews 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
1.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: New Astronomy Reviews publishes review articles in all fields of astronomy and astrophysics: theoretical, observational and instrumental. This international review journal is written for a broad audience of professional astronomers and astrophysicists. The journal covers solar physics, planetary systems, stellar, galactic and extra-galactic astronomy and astrophysics, as well as cosmology. New Astronomy Reviews is also open for proposals covering interdisciplinary and emerging topics such as astrobiology, astroparticle physics, and astrochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信