语音和语音对声调语言听者感知非母语词汇音调的贡献:记忆负荷和刺激变异性的影响

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Juqiang Chen , Mark Antoniou , Catherine T. Best
{"title":"语音和语音对声调语言听者感知非母语词汇音调的贡献:记忆负荷和刺激变异性的影响","authors":"Juqiang Chen ,&nbsp;Mark Antoniou ,&nbsp;Catherine T. Best","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study examined native language phonological and phonetic factors in non-native lexical tone perception by tone language listeners, manipulating memory load and stimulus variability to bias listeners towards a more phonological or more phonetic mode of perception. Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners categorised the five Thai lexical tones to their native tones, and discriminated five selected Thai tone contrasts that were predicted by the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM, <span>Best, 1995</span>) to be discriminated differently. Categorisation responses showed more phonologically-based patterns under high than low memory load but were unaffected by talker and vowel variability, whereas discrimination accuracy was reduced by talker and vowel variability but not by memory load. Phonological factors indicated by type of categorisation and category overlap generally predicted the discrimination of non-native tone contrasts in line with PAM principles. Phonetic factors reflected in category overlap scores and fit index difference scores predicted variations in discriminating contrasts of the same contrast categorisation type. These findings uphold the extension of PAM principles to non-native tone perception by native listeners of other tone languages. Native phonological and phonetic contributions to non-native speech perception differ between categorisation and discrimination tasks, as reflected in differential modulation by memory load and stimulus variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phonological and phonetic contributions to perception of non-native lexical tones by tone language listeners: Effects of memory load and stimulus variability\",\"authors\":\"Juqiang Chen ,&nbsp;Mark Antoniou ,&nbsp;Catherine T. Best\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study examined native language phonological and phonetic factors in non-native lexical tone perception by tone language listeners, manipulating memory load and stimulus variability to bias listeners towards a more phonological or more phonetic mode of perception. Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners categorised the five Thai lexical tones to their native tones, and discriminated five selected Thai tone contrasts that were predicted by the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM, <span>Best, 1995</span>) to be discriminated differently. Categorisation responses showed more phonologically-based patterns under high than low memory load but were unaffected by talker and vowel variability, whereas discrimination accuracy was reduced by talker and vowel variability but not by memory load. Phonological factors indicated by type of categorisation and category overlap generally predicted the discrimination of non-native tone contrasts in line with PAM principles. Phonetic factors reflected in category overlap scores and fit index difference scores predicted variations in discriminating contrasts of the same contrast categorisation type. These findings uphold the extension of PAM principles to non-native tone perception by native listeners of other tone languages. Native phonological and phonetic contributions to non-native speech perception differ between categorisation and discrimination tasks, as reflected in differential modulation by memory load and stimulus variability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Phonetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Phonetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447022000742\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447022000742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究考察了声调语言听众在非母语词汇声调感知中的母语语音和语音因素,操纵记忆负荷和刺激变异性,使听众倾向于更语音或更语音的感知模式。普通话和越南语听众将五种泰语词汇音调分类为他们的母语音调,并区分五种选定的泰语音调对比,这些对比是由感知同化模型(PAM,Best,1995)预测的,可以进行不同的区分。在高记忆负荷下,分类反应显示出更多基于语音的模式,但不受说话者和元音变异性的影响,而辨别准确性因说话者和元音的变异性而降低,但不因记忆负荷而降低。根据PAM原理,由分类类型和分类重叠指示的语音因素通常预测非母语音调对比的辨别。类别重叠分数和拟合指数差异分数中反映的语音因素预测了相同对比度分类类型的辨别对比度的变化。这些发现支持PAM原则对其他声调语言的母语听众的非母语声调感知的扩展。分类和辨别任务对非母语语音感知的母语语音和语音贡献不同,这反映在记忆负荷和刺激可变性的差异调制中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phonological and phonetic contributions to perception of non-native lexical tones by tone language listeners: Effects of memory load and stimulus variability

The present study examined native language phonological and phonetic factors in non-native lexical tone perception by tone language listeners, manipulating memory load and stimulus variability to bias listeners towards a more phonological or more phonetic mode of perception. Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners categorised the five Thai lexical tones to their native tones, and discriminated five selected Thai tone contrasts that were predicted by the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM, Best, 1995) to be discriminated differently. Categorisation responses showed more phonologically-based patterns under high than low memory load but were unaffected by talker and vowel variability, whereas discrimination accuracy was reduced by talker and vowel variability but not by memory load. Phonological factors indicated by type of categorisation and category overlap generally predicted the discrimination of non-native tone contrasts in line with PAM principles. Phonetic factors reflected in category overlap scores and fit index difference scores predicted variations in discriminating contrasts of the same contrast categorisation type. These findings uphold the extension of PAM principles to non-native tone perception by native listeners of other tone languages. Native phonological and phonetic contributions to non-native speech perception differ between categorisation and discrimination tasks, as reflected in differential modulation by memory load and stimulus variability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信