β−和EC/β+跃迁的log ft值系统

IF 2.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL
Steffen Turkat , Xavier Mougeot , Balraj Singh , Kai Zuber
{"title":"β−和EC/β+跃迁的log ft值系统","authors":"Steffen Turkat ,&nbsp;Xavier Mougeot ,&nbsp;Balraj Singh ,&nbsp;Kai Zuber","doi":"10.1016/j.adt.2023.101584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work is an update of the 1998 publication by Singh et al. <span>[1]</span> and reviews the log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values for all the known <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>-decay branches (<span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>−, <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>+/EC). Furthermore, an update of all <span><math><mi>Q</mi></math></span>-values (from AME2020  <span>[2]</span>), as well as a recalculation of all the log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values (through BetaShape code <span>[3]</span>, <span>[4]</span>) has been conducted using relevant data in the ENSDF database, as well as in newer literature. Only those cases have been considered in this review, where the beta transitions occur between levels of firm single spin assignments (86% of the transitions), and with probable single spin assignments (14% of the transitions), but with firm parity assignments for all the transitions. Weak <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span> branches of <span><math><mo>&lt;</mo></math></span>1% intensity in complex decay schemes have generally been omitted. Out of a total of 26<!--> <!-->318 <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span> transitions extracted from the ENSDF database and current literature, data for only 4038 <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span> transitions survived the filtering criteria in the present review. The log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values in <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span> decay, spanning about 21 orders of magnitude, have been classified into allowed and forbidden categories according to the classification scheme of Konopinski <span>[5]</span>. All log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values have been deduced using the BetaShape code with new developments presented in this study. A very few number of log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values for very low-energy beta transitions (<span><math><mo>&lt;</mo></math></span>5<!--> <!-->keV) survived the cut criteria and are briefly discussed in terms of atomic overlap corrections. Also tabulated and briefly discussed are seven superallowed cases with <span><math><mi>Δ</mi></math></span>T = 0, T<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>z</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>(parent) = −2, while a known case for <sup>28</sup>S to <sup>28</sup>P has been omitted as reliable EC/<span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>+feeding to the analog state in <sup>28</sup>P cannot be assigned due to lack of adequate experimental and detailed data for this decay. Centroid, width, minimum and maximum values for each category have been deduced. Uncertainties have been estimated and are also given. For literature coverage in the present review, see discussion in text.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55580,"journal":{"name":"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 101584"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematics of log ft values for β−, and EC/β+ transitions\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Turkat ,&nbsp;Xavier Mougeot ,&nbsp;Balraj Singh ,&nbsp;Kai Zuber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adt.2023.101584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This work is an update of the 1998 publication by Singh et al. <span>[1]</span> and reviews the log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values for all the known <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>-decay branches (<span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>−, <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>+/EC). Furthermore, an update of all <span><math><mi>Q</mi></math></span>-values (from AME2020  <span>[2]</span>), as well as a recalculation of all the log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values (through BetaShape code <span>[3]</span>, <span>[4]</span>) has been conducted using relevant data in the ENSDF database, as well as in newer literature. Only those cases have been considered in this review, where the beta transitions occur between levels of firm single spin assignments (86% of the transitions), and with probable single spin assignments (14% of the transitions), but with firm parity assignments for all the transitions. Weak <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span> branches of <span><math><mo>&lt;</mo></math></span>1% intensity in complex decay schemes have generally been omitted. Out of a total of 26<!--> <!-->318 <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span> transitions extracted from the ENSDF database and current literature, data for only 4038 <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span> transitions survived the filtering criteria in the present review. The log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values in <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span> decay, spanning about 21 orders of magnitude, have been classified into allowed and forbidden categories according to the classification scheme of Konopinski <span>[5]</span>. All log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values have been deduced using the BetaShape code with new developments presented in this study. A very few number of log<!--> <span><math><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span> values for very low-energy beta transitions (<span><math><mo>&lt;</mo></math></span>5<!--> <!-->keV) survived the cut criteria and are briefly discussed in terms of atomic overlap corrections. Also tabulated and briefly discussed are seven superallowed cases with <span><math><mi>Δ</mi></math></span>T = 0, T<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>z</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>(parent) = −2, while a known case for <sup>28</sup>S to <sup>28</sup>P has been omitted as reliable EC/<span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>+feeding to the analog state in <sup>28</sup>P cannot be assigned due to lack of adequate experimental and detailed data for this decay. Centroid, width, minimum and maximum values for each category have been deduced. Uncertainties have been estimated and are also given. For literature coverage in the present review, see discussion in text.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X23000128\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X23000128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这项工作是Singh等人1998年出版物的更新。[1]并回顾了所有已知β衰变分支(β−,β+/EC)的log ft值。此外,使用ENSDF数据库和更新文献中的相关数据,对所有Q值进行了更新(来自AME2020[2]),并对所有log ft值进行了重新计算(通过BetaShape代码[3]、[4])。在这篇综述中只考虑了这些情况,其中贝塔转换发生在公司单自旋分配的级别之间(86%的转换),以及可能的单自旋分配(14%的转换)中,但所有转换都有公司平价分配。<;复杂衰变方案中的1%强度通常被省略。在从ENSDF数据库和当前文献中提取的总共26318个β跃迁中,只有4038个β跃迁的数据符合本综述的过滤标准。根据Konopinski[5]的分类方案,β衰变中的log ft值跨越约21个数量级,已被分为允许和禁止两类。所有log ft值都是使用BetaShape代码推导出来的,本研究提出了新的发展。非常低能量β跃迁(<;5keV)的极少数log ft值在切割标准中幸存下来,并在原子重叠校正方面进行了简要讨论。此外,表中还简要讨论了ΔT=0,Tz(母体)=−2的七种超允许情况,而28S至28P的一种已知情况被省略,因为由于缺乏足够的实验和详细的衰变数据,无法分配28P中模拟状态的可靠EC/β+进料。推导了每个类别的质心、宽度、最小值和最大值。对不确定性进行了估计,并给出了不确定性。关于本综述中的文献报道,请参阅正文中的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematics of log ft values for β−, and EC/β+ transitions

This work is an update of the 1998 publication by Singh et al. [1] and reviews the log ft values for all the known β-decay branches (β−, β+/EC). Furthermore, an update of all Q-values (from AME2020  [2]), as well as a recalculation of all the log ft values (through BetaShape code [3], [4]) has been conducted using relevant data in the ENSDF database, as well as in newer literature. Only those cases have been considered in this review, where the beta transitions occur between levels of firm single spin assignments (86% of the transitions), and with probable single spin assignments (14% of the transitions), but with firm parity assignments for all the transitions. Weak β branches of <1% intensity in complex decay schemes have generally been omitted. Out of a total of 26 318 β transitions extracted from the ENSDF database and current literature, data for only 4038 β transitions survived the filtering criteria in the present review. The log ft values in β decay, spanning about 21 orders of magnitude, have been classified into allowed and forbidden categories according to the classification scheme of Konopinski [5]. All log ft values have been deduced using the BetaShape code with new developments presented in this study. A very few number of log ft values for very low-energy beta transitions (<5 keV) survived the cut criteria and are briefly discussed in terms of atomic overlap corrections. Also tabulated and briefly discussed are seven superallowed cases with ΔT = 0, Tz(parent) = −2, while a known case for 28S to 28P has been omitted as reliable EC/β+feeding to the analog state in 28P cannot be assigned due to lack of adequate experimental and detailed data for this decay. Centroid, width, minimum and maximum values for each category have been deduced. Uncertainties have been estimated and are also given. For literature coverage in the present review, see discussion in text.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables presents compilations of experimental and theoretical information in atomic physics, nuclear physics, and closely related fields. The journal is devoted to the publication of tables and graphs of general usefulness to researchers in both basic and applied areas. Extensive ... click here for full Aims & Scope Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables presents compilations of experimental and theoretical information in atomic physics, nuclear physics, and closely related fields. The journal is devoted to the publication of tables and graphs of general usefulness to researchers in both basic and applied areas. Extensive and comprehensive compilations of experimental and theoretical results are featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信