中国发展主义外交政策的矛盾

Q3 Social Sciences
Orbis Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orbis.2023.08.002
Matt Ferchen
{"title":"中国发展主义外交政策的矛盾","authors":"Matt Ferchen","doi":"10.1016/j.orbis.2023.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite China’s assurances that mutually beneficial economic development can overcome political or security challenges, its developmentalist foreign policy has faced a range of difficulties since the early 2000s. Yet since the introduction of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013, China has doubled down on its foreign policy developmentalism, reproducing and deepening the propensity to overpromise and underdeliver on its claims for development. Even in the face of the Covid pandemic and growing tensions with the United States, China has remained committed to promoting itself as an agent and engine of economic development on the global stage while also recalibrating the focus of development-focused policies to include health, environmental, and digital aims. As the United States seeks to establish a “new Washington Consensus” with appeal to emerging economies that are already deeply economic interdependent with China, it needs to better account for the momentum and even appeal of China’s flawed but adaptable developmentalist foreign policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45433,"journal":{"name":"Orbis","volume":"67 4","pages":"Pages 471-495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contradictions in China’s Developmentalist Foreign Policy\",\"authors\":\"Matt Ferchen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orbis.2023.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite China’s assurances that mutually beneficial economic development can overcome political or security challenges, its developmentalist foreign policy has faced a range of difficulties since the early 2000s. Yet since the introduction of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013, China has doubled down on its foreign policy developmentalism, reproducing and deepening the propensity to overpromise and underdeliver on its claims for development. Even in the face of the Covid pandemic and growing tensions with the United States, China has remained committed to promoting itself as an agent and engine of economic development on the global stage while also recalibrating the focus of development-focused policies to include health, environmental, and digital aims. As the United States seeks to establish a “new Washington Consensus” with appeal to emerging economies that are already deeply economic interdependent with China, it needs to better account for the momentum and even appeal of China’s flawed but adaptable developmentalist foreign policy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orbis\",\"volume\":\"67 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 471-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orbis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030438723000364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030438723000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管中国保证互利的经济发展可以克服政治或安全挑战,但自21世纪初以来,其发展主义外交政策面临着一系列困难。然而,自2013年提出“一带一路”倡议倡议以来,中国在外交政策发展主义上加倍努力,再现并加深了在发展主张上承诺过度和承诺不足的倾向。即使面对新冠肺炎疫情和与美国日益紧张的关系,中国仍然致力于在全球舞台上宣传自己是经济发展的推动者和引擎,同时也重新调整以发展为重点的政策重点,将健康、环境和数字目标纳入其中。随着美国寻求建立一个“新华盛顿共识”,以吸引已经在经济上与中国高度依赖的新兴经济体,它需要更好地考虑中国有缺陷但适应性强的发展主义外交政策的势头甚至吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Contradictions in China’s Developmentalist Foreign Policy

Despite China’s assurances that mutually beneficial economic development can overcome political or security challenges, its developmentalist foreign policy has faced a range of difficulties since the early 2000s. Yet since the introduction of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013, China has doubled down on its foreign policy developmentalism, reproducing and deepening the propensity to overpromise and underdeliver on its claims for development. Even in the face of the Covid pandemic and growing tensions with the United States, China has remained committed to promoting itself as an agent and engine of economic development on the global stage while also recalibrating the focus of development-focused policies to include health, environmental, and digital aims. As the United States seeks to establish a “new Washington Consensus” with appeal to emerging economies that are already deeply economic interdependent with China, it needs to better account for the momentum and even appeal of China’s flawed but adaptable developmentalist foreign policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orbis
Orbis SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Orbis, the Foreign Policy Research Institute quarterly journal of world affairs, was founded in 1957 as a forum for policymakers, scholars, and the informed public who sought an engaging, thought-provoking debate beyond the predictable, conventional journals of that time. Nearly half a century later, Orbis continues to offer informative, insightful, and lively discourse on the full range of topics relating to American foreign policy and national security, as well as in-depth analysis on important international developments. Orbis readers always know the stories behind the headlines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信