Rasburicase治疗肿瘤溶解综合征:综述

Kamran Mahfooz , Haris Sohail , Ani Gvajaia , Uroosa Arif , Daisy Grewal , Monica Reddy Muppidi , Vanya Vohra , Aamir Tarique , Advait Vasavada
{"title":"Rasburicase治疗肿瘤溶解综合征:综述","authors":"Kamran Mahfooz ,&nbsp;Haris Sohail ,&nbsp;Ani Gvajaia ,&nbsp;Uroosa Arif ,&nbsp;Daisy Grewal ,&nbsp;Monica Reddy Muppidi ,&nbsp;Vanya Vohra ,&nbsp;Aamir Tarique ,&nbsp;Advait Vasavada","doi":"10.1016/j.cpt.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) remains a debilitating cause of hospitalization and death in patients with cancer and is a significant challenge for healthcare providers despite advancements in its management. This umbrella review analyzed the results of meta-analyses on the use of rasburicase in the treatment of patients with cancer. A literature search was performed of five databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Global Index Medicus, and ScienceDirect) for articles with full texts available online. A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and Review Manager software was used to conduct all statistical analyses. The systematic search identified eight relevant meta-analyses, with primary analyses including outcome data that analyzed mortality, renal failure, and comparisons with allopurinol. The pooled data showed that rasburicase effectively reduced TLS development and serum uric acid levels in children and adults with malignancies. Most outcomes did not differ significantly compared with those of allopurinol. Future trials should focus on the cost-effectiveness of rasburicase compared to that of allopurinol while including high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients. Rasburicase is safe and effective for managing patients with TLS. However, recent large-scale meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Most meta-analyses were graded as low to critically low as per AMSTAR 2. The analysis revealed that the benefit of rasburicase did not differ significantly from that of allopurinol, which has higher cost-effectiveness and fewer side effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93920,"journal":{"name":"Cancer pathogenesis and therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rasburicase in treating tumor lysis syndrome: An umbrella review\",\"authors\":\"Kamran Mahfooz ,&nbsp;Haris Sohail ,&nbsp;Ani Gvajaia ,&nbsp;Uroosa Arif ,&nbsp;Daisy Grewal ,&nbsp;Monica Reddy Muppidi ,&nbsp;Vanya Vohra ,&nbsp;Aamir Tarique ,&nbsp;Advait Vasavada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpt.2023.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) remains a debilitating cause of hospitalization and death in patients with cancer and is a significant challenge for healthcare providers despite advancements in its management. This umbrella review analyzed the results of meta-analyses on the use of rasburicase in the treatment of patients with cancer. A literature search was performed of five databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Global Index Medicus, and ScienceDirect) for articles with full texts available online. A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and Review Manager software was used to conduct all statistical analyses. The systematic search identified eight relevant meta-analyses, with primary analyses including outcome data that analyzed mortality, renal failure, and comparisons with allopurinol. The pooled data showed that rasburicase effectively reduced TLS development and serum uric acid levels in children and adults with malignancies. Most outcomes did not differ significantly compared with those of allopurinol. Future trials should focus on the cost-effectiveness of rasburicase compared to that of allopurinol while including high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients. Rasburicase is safe and effective for managing patients with TLS. However, recent large-scale meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Most meta-analyses were graded as low to critically low as per AMSTAR 2. The analysis revealed that the benefit of rasburicase did not differ significantly from that of allopurinol, which has higher cost-effectiveness and fewer side effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer pathogenesis and therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer pathogenesis and therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949713223000447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer pathogenesis and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949713223000447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)仍然是癌症患者住院和死亡的一个使人虚弱的原因,尽管其管理取得了进步,但它对医疗保健提供者来说是一个重大挑战。这篇综述分析了rasburicase在癌症患者治疗中的应用的荟萃分析结果。对五个数据库(PubMed、Google Scholar、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Global Index Medicus和ScienceDirect)进行了文献检索,以查找在线全文文章。评估系统综述2的测量工具(AMSTAR 2)用于评估纳入研究的质量,Review Manager软件用于进行所有统计分析。系统检索确定了八项相关的荟萃分析,主要分析包括分析死亡率、肾衰竭的结果数据,以及与别嘌醇的比较。汇总的数据显示,拉斯伯里西普有效地降低了患有恶性肿瘤的儿童和成人的TLS发展和血清尿酸水平。与别嘌醇相比,大多数结果没有显著差异。未来的试验应侧重于与别嘌醇相比,拉斯伯里病例的成本效益,同时包括高危、中危和低危患者。Rasburicase治疗TLS患者安全有效。然而,最近的大规模荟萃分析报告了相互矛盾的结果。根据AMSTAR 2,大多数荟萃分析的评分从低到极低。分析显示,rasburicase的益处与别嘌呤醇没有显著差异,别嘌呤醇具有更高的成本效益和更少的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rasburicase in treating tumor lysis syndrome: An umbrella review

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) remains a debilitating cause of hospitalization and death in patients with cancer and is a significant challenge for healthcare providers despite advancements in its management. This umbrella review analyzed the results of meta-analyses on the use of rasburicase in the treatment of patients with cancer. A literature search was performed of five databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Global Index Medicus, and ScienceDirect) for articles with full texts available online. A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and Review Manager software was used to conduct all statistical analyses. The systematic search identified eight relevant meta-analyses, with primary analyses including outcome data that analyzed mortality, renal failure, and comparisons with allopurinol. The pooled data showed that rasburicase effectively reduced TLS development and serum uric acid levels in children and adults with malignancies. Most outcomes did not differ significantly compared with those of allopurinol. Future trials should focus on the cost-effectiveness of rasburicase compared to that of allopurinol while including high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients. Rasburicase is safe and effective for managing patients with TLS. However, recent large-scale meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Most meta-analyses were graded as low to critically low as per AMSTAR 2. The analysis revealed that the benefit of rasburicase did not differ significantly from that of allopurinol, which has higher cost-effectiveness and fewer side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer pathogenesis and therapy
Cancer pathogenesis and therapy Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Cancer Research, Oncology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信