最大环差对全身PET/CT扫描仪的图像质量和噪声特性的影响。

F P Schmidt, J G Mannheim, P M Linder, P Will, L S Kiefer, M Conti, C la Fougère, I Rausch
{"title":"最大环差对全身PET/CT扫描仪的图像质量和噪声特性的影响。","authors":"F P Schmidt,&nbsp;J G Mannheim,&nbsp;P M Linder,&nbsp;P Will,&nbsp;L S Kiefer,&nbsp;M Conti,&nbsp;C la Fougère,&nbsp;I Rausch","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sensitivity of a PET system highly depends on the axial acceptance angle or maximum ring difference (MRD), which can be particularly high for total-body scanners due to their larger axial field of views (aFOVs). This study aims to evaluate the impact on image quality (IQ) and noise performance when MRD85 (18°), the current standard for clinical use, is increased to MRD322 (52°) for the Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies with a cylindrical phantom covering the 106 cm aFOV and an IEC phantom filled with <sup>18</sup>F, <sup>68</sup>Ga and <sup>89</sup>Zr were performed for acquisition times from 60 to 1800 s and activity concentrations from 0.4 to 3 kBq/ml to assess uniformity, contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) and to characterize noise by coefficient of variation (CV). Spatial resolution was compared for both MRDs by sampling a quadrant of the FOV with a point source. Further IQ, CV, liver SUV<sub>mean</sub> and SUV<sub>max</sub> were compared for a cohort of 5 patients scanned with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (3 MBq/kg, 1 h p.i.) from 30 to 300 s.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CV was improved by a factor of up to 1.49 and is highest for short acquisition times, peaks at the center field of view and mitigates parabolic in axial direction with no difference to MRD85 beyond the central 80 cm. No substantial differences between the two evaluated MRDs in regards to uniformity, SUV<sub>mean</sub> or CRC for the different isotopes were observed. A degradation of the average spatial resolution of 0.9 ± 0.2 mm in the central 40 cm FOV was determined with MRD322. Depending on the acquisition time MRD322 resulted in a decrease of SUV<sub>max</sub> between 23.8% (30 s) and 9.0% (300 s).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient and phantom studies revealed that scan time could be lowered by approximately a factor of two with MRD322 while maintaining similar noise performance. The moderate degradation in spatial resolution for MRD322 is worth to exploit the full potential of the Quadra by either shorten scan times or leverage noise performance in particular for low count scenarios such as ultra-late imaging or dynamic studies with high temporal resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the maximum ring difference on image quality and noise characteristics of a total-body PET/CT scanner.\",\"authors\":\"F P Schmidt,&nbsp;J G Mannheim,&nbsp;P M Linder,&nbsp;P Will,&nbsp;L S Kiefer,&nbsp;M Conti,&nbsp;C la Fougère,&nbsp;I Rausch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The sensitivity of a PET system highly depends on the axial acceptance angle or maximum ring difference (MRD), which can be particularly high for total-body scanners due to their larger axial field of views (aFOVs). This study aims to evaluate the impact on image quality (IQ) and noise performance when MRD85 (18°), the current standard for clinical use, is increased to MRD322 (52°) for the Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies with a cylindrical phantom covering the 106 cm aFOV and an IEC phantom filled with <sup>18</sup>F, <sup>68</sup>Ga and <sup>89</sup>Zr were performed for acquisition times from 60 to 1800 s and activity concentrations from 0.4 to 3 kBq/ml to assess uniformity, contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) and to characterize noise by coefficient of variation (CV). Spatial resolution was compared for both MRDs by sampling a quadrant of the FOV with a point source. Further IQ, CV, liver SUV<sub>mean</sub> and SUV<sub>max</sub> were compared for a cohort of 5 patients scanned with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (3 MBq/kg, 1 h p.i.) from 30 to 300 s.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CV was improved by a factor of up to 1.49 and is highest for short acquisition times, peaks at the center field of view and mitigates parabolic in axial direction with no difference to MRD85 beyond the central 80 cm. No substantial differences between the two evaluated MRDs in regards to uniformity, SUV<sub>mean</sub> or CRC for the different isotopes were observed. A degradation of the average spatial resolution of 0.9 ± 0.2 mm in the central 40 cm FOV was determined with MRD322. Depending on the acquisition time MRD322 resulted in a decrease of SUV<sub>max</sub> between 23.8% (30 s) and 9.0% (300 s).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient and phantom studies revealed that scan time could be lowered by approximately a factor of two with MRD322 while maintaining similar noise performance. The moderate degradation in spatial resolution for MRD322 is worth to exploit the full potential of the Quadra by either shorten scan times or leverage noise performance in particular for low count scenarios such as ultra-late imaging or dynamic studies with high temporal resolution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

PET系统的灵敏度在很大程度上取决于轴向接受角或最大环差(MRD),由于其较大的轴向视场(aFOV),这对于全身扫描仪来说可能特别高。本研究旨在评估当前临床使用标准MRD85(18°)提高到Biograph-Vision Quadra(Siemens Healthineers)的MRD322(52°)时对图像质量(IQ)和噪声性能的影响 cm aFOV和填充18F、68Ga和89Zr的IEC体模的采集时间为60至1800 s和0.4-3的活性浓度 kBq/ml以评估均匀性、对比度恢复系数(CRC)并通过变异系数(CV)表征噪声。通过用点源对FOV的象限进行采样,比较了两种MRD的空间分辨率。进一步比较了5名接受[18F]FDG扫描的患者的IQ、CV、肝脏SUVmean和SUVmax(3 MBq/kg,1 h p.i.)从30到300 结果:CV提高了1.49倍,在短采集时间内最高,在中心视场处达到峰值,并缓解了轴向抛物线,与MRD85在中心80以外没有差异 在不同同位素的均匀性、SUVmean或CRC方面,两个评估的MRD之间没有观察到实质性差异。0.9的平均空间分辨率下降 ± 0.2 中心40毫米 cm FOV用MRD322测定。根据采集时间,MRD322导致SUVmax下降23.8%(30 s) 和9.0%(300 s) 结论:患者和体模研究表明,使用MRD322可以将扫描时间降低约两倍,同时保持类似的噪声性能。MRD322空间分辨率的适度降低值得通过缩短扫描时间或利用噪声性能来充分利用Quadra的潜力,特别是在低计数场景中,如超晚期成像或具有高时间分辨率的动态研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the maximum ring difference on image quality and noise characteristics of a total-body PET/CT scanner.

The sensitivity of a PET system highly depends on the axial acceptance angle or maximum ring difference (MRD), which can be particularly high for total-body scanners due to their larger axial field of views (aFOVs). This study aims to evaluate the impact on image quality (IQ) and noise performance when MRD85 (18°), the current standard for clinical use, is increased to MRD322 (52°) for the Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers).

Methods: Studies with a cylindrical phantom covering the 106 cm aFOV and an IEC phantom filled with 18F, 68Ga and 89Zr were performed for acquisition times from 60 to 1800 s and activity concentrations from 0.4 to 3 kBq/ml to assess uniformity, contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) and to characterize noise by coefficient of variation (CV). Spatial resolution was compared for both MRDs by sampling a quadrant of the FOV with a point source. Further IQ, CV, liver SUVmean and SUVmax were compared for a cohort of 5 patients scanned with [18F]FDG (3 MBq/kg, 1 h p.i.) from 30 to 300 s.

Results: CV was improved by a factor of up to 1.49 and is highest for short acquisition times, peaks at the center field of view and mitigates parabolic in axial direction with no difference to MRD85 beyond the central 80 cm. No substantial differences between the two evaluated MRDs in regards to uniformity, SUVmean or CRC for the different isotopes were observed. A degradation of the average spatial resolution of 0.9 ± 0.2 mm in the central 40 cm FOV was determined with MRD322. Depending on the acquisition time MRD322 resulted in a decrease of SUVmax between 23.8% (30 s) and 9.0% (300 s).

Conclusion: Patient and phantom studies revealed that scan time could be lowered by approximately a factor of two with MRD322 while maintaining similar noise performance. The moderate degradation in spatial resolution for MRD322 is worth to exploit the full potential of the Quadra by either shorten scan times or leverage noise performance in particular for low count scenarios such as ultra-late imaging or dynamic studies with high temporal resolution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信