Garrett S Bullock, Patrick Ward, Franco M Impellizzeri, Stefan Kluzek, Tom Hughes, Charles Hillman, Brian R Waterman, Kerry Danelson, Kaitlin Henry, Emily Barr, Kelsey Healy, Anu M Räisänen, Christina Gomez, Garrett Fernandez, Jakob Wolf, Kristen F Nicholson, Tim Sell, Ryan Zerega, Paula Dhiman, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins
{"title":"在前面和公开，笼罩在秘密中，还是介于两者之间？运动医学研究中开放科学实践的元研究系统综述。","authors":"Garrett S Bullock, Patrick Ward, Franco M Impellizzeri, Stefan Kluzek, Tom Hughes, Charles Hillman, Brian R Waterman, Kerry Danelson, Kaitlin Henry, Emily Barr, Kelsey Healy, Anu M Räisänen, Christina Gomez, Garrett Fernandez, Jakob Wolf, Kristen F Nicholson, Tim Sell, Ryan Zerega, Paula Dhiman, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate open science practices in research published in the top 5 sports medicine journals from May 1, 2022, and October 1, 2022. <b>DESIGN:</b> A meta-research systematic review. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> Open science practices were searched in MEDLINE. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> We included original scientific research published in one of the identified top 5 sports medicine journals in 2022 as ranked by Clarivate: (1) <i>British Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, (2) <i>Journal of Sport and Health Science</i>, (3) <i>American Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, (4) <i>Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise</i>, and (5) <i>Sports Medicine-Open</i>. Studies were excluded if they were systematic reviews, qualitative research, gray literature, or animal or cadaver models. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Open science practices were extracted in accordance with the Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines and patient and public involvement. <b>RESULTS:</b> Two hundred forty-three studies were included. The median number of open science practices in each study was 2, out of a maximum of 12 (range: 0-8; interquartile range: 2). Two hundred thirty-four studies (96%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 94%-99%) provided an author conflict-of-interest statement and 163 (67%, 95% CI: 62%-73%) reported funding. Twenty-one studies (9%, 95% CI: 5%-12%) provided open-access data. Fifty-four studies (22%, 95% CI: 17%-27%) included a data availability statement and 3 (1%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) made code available. Seventy-six studies (32%, 95% CI: 25%-37%) had transparent materials and 30 (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) used a reporting guideline. Twenty-eight studies (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) were preregistered. Six studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-4%) published a protocol. Four studies (2%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) reported an analysis plan a priori. Seven studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-5%) reported patient and public involvement. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Open science practices in the sports medicine field are extremely limited. The least followed practices were sharing code, data, and analysis plans. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-13. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12016</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"735-747"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Up Front and Open? Shrouded in Secrecy? Or Somewhere in Between? A Meta-Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research.\",\"authors\":\"Garrett S Bullock, Patrick Ward, Franco M Impellizzeri, Stefan Kluzek, Tom Hughes, Charles Hillman, Brian R Waterman, Kerry Danelson, Kaitlin Henry, Emily Barr, Kelsey Healy, Anu M Räisänen, Christina Gomez, Garrett Fernandez, Jakob Wolf, Kristen F Nicholson, Tim Sell, Ryan Zerega, Paula Dhiman, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2023.12016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate open science practices in research published in the top 5 sports medicine journals from May 1, 2022, and October 1, 2022. <b>DESIGN:</b> A meta-research systematic review. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> Open science practices were searched in MEDLINE. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> We included original scientific research published in one of the identified top 5 sports medicine journals in 2022 as ranked by Clarivate: (1) <i>British Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, (2) <i>Journal of Sport and Health Science</i>, (3) <i>American Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, (4) <i>Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise</i>, and (5) <i>Sports Medicine-Open</i>. Studies were excluded if they were systematic reviews, qualitative research, gray literature, or animal or cadaver models. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Open science practices were extracted in accordance with the Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines and patient and public involvement. <b>RESULTS:</b> Two hundred forty-three studies were included. The median number of open science practices in each study was 2, out of a maximum of 12 (range: 0-8; interquartile range: 2). Two hundred thirty-four studies (96%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 94%-99%) provided an author conflict-of-interest statement and 163 (67%, 95% CI: 62%-73%) reported funding. Twenty-one studies (9%, 95% CI: 5%-12%) provided open-access data. Fifty-four studies (22%, 95% CI: 17%-27%) included a data availability statement and 3 (1%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) made code available. Seventy-six studies (32%, 95% CI: 25%-37%) had transparent materials and 30 (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) used a reporting guideline. Twenty-eight studies (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) were preregistered. Six studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-4%) published a protocol. Four studies (2%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) reported an analysis plan a priori. Seven studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-5%) reported patient and public involvement. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Open science practices in the sports medicine field are extremely limited. The least followed practices were sharing code, data, and analysis plans. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-13. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12016</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"735-747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.12016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.12016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Up Front and Open? Shrouded in Secrecy? Or Somewhere in Between? A Meta-Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate open science practices in research published in the top 5 sports medicine journals from May 1, 2022, and October 1, 2022. DESIGN: A meta-research systematic review. LITERATURE SEARCH: Open science practices were searched in MEDLINE. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included original scientific research published in one of the identified top 5 sports medicine journals in 2022 as ranked by Clarivate: (1) British Journal of Sports Medicine, (2) Journal of Sport and Health Science, (3) American Journal of Sports Medicine, (4) Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, and (5) Sports Medicine-Open. Studies were excluded if they were systematic reviews, qualitative research, gray literature, or animal or cadaver models. DATA SYNTHESIS: Open science practices were extracted in accordance with the Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines and patient and public involvement. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three studies were included. The median number of open science practices in each study was 2, out of a maximum of 12 (range: 0-8; interquartile range: 2). Two hundred thirty-four studies (96%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 94%-99%) provided an author conflict-of-interest statement and 163 (67%, 95% CI: 62%-73%) reported funding. Twenty-one studies (9%, 95% CI: 5%-12%) provided open-access data. Fifty-four studies (22%, 95% CI: 17%-27%) included a data availability statement and 3 (1%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) made code available. Seventy-six studies (32%, 95% CI: 25%-37%) had transparent materials and 30 (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) used a reporting guideline. Twenty-eight studies (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) were preregistered. Six studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-4%) published a protocol. Four studies (2%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) reported an analysis plan a priori. Seven studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-5%) reported patient and public involvement. CONCLUSION: Open science practices in the sports medicine field are extremely limited. The least followed practices were sharing code, data, and analysis plans. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-13. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12016.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics.
With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
