贸易协定和烟草控制政策:2001年至2019年《烟草控制框架公约》对贸易协定监管内容的影响分析。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tzu-Ying Chen, Ying-Jun Lin, Tung-Liang Chiang, Feng-Jen Tsai
{"title":"贸易协定和烟草控制政策:2001年至2019年《烟草控制框架公约》对贸易协定监管内容的影响分析。","authors":"Tzu-Ying Chen, Ying-Jun Lin, Tung-Liang Chiang, Feng-Jen Tsai","doi":"10.1186/s12992-023-00979-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyze the impact of Framework of Convention of Tobacco Control (FCTC) on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of trade agreements from'WTO Regional Free Trade Agreement Database' using keywords including \"tobacco\", \"cigarette\", \"smoking\" and \"FCTC\" from May to August 2020 resulted in a total sample of 268 trade agreements, from which 69 trade agreements were coded and analyzed. Provisions in trade agreements, identified via the aforementioned keywords, were categorized into 6 trade measures. The word counts of the provisions containing; FCTC; were calculated. Chi-square tests were applied to analyze the differences of regulatory patterns between different time frames. The import and export values (USD) of tobacco products under trade agreements containing the term \"FCTC\" were further collected from the \"International Trade Statistics 2001-2020\" for understanding the impact of the provision on the trade flow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 69 agreements, the percentage of trade agreements containing keyword as \"FCTC\" increased significantly from 0% to 2011 to 12% after 2011. A significant decrease of using trade measures as \"the exclusion list\" was found after 2011 (from 10% to 0). The word counts of provisions containing; FCTC; increased from 24 words in 2011 to 164 words in 2018, and the content of the provisions became more concrete over time. There are six trade agreements containing \"FCTC\", and all these 6 agreements were ratified by European Union (EU). Despite EU ratified trade agreements with \"FCTC\", the import and export values of tobacco products between EU and the other party countries increased with time. But the gap of average trade values between trade agreements with and without \"FCTC\" being widened with time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a first study evaluated the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements, our study results showed that after countries signed trade agreements containing keyword FCTC, the regulatory contents changed significantly. Further studies are recommended to understand the reason and criteria for incorporating FCTC provisions into trade agreements, especially in the EU.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade agreements and tobacco control policy: analysis of the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.\",\"authors\":\"Tzu-Ying Chen, Ying-Jun Lin, Tung-Liang Chiang, Feng-Jen Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12992-023-00979-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyze the impact of Framework of Convention of Tobacco Control (FCTC) on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of trade agreements from'WTO Regional Free Trade Agreement Database' using keywords including \\\"tobacco\\\", \\\"cigarette\\\", \\\"smoking\\\" and \\\"FCTC\\\" from May to August 2020 resulted in a total sample of 268 trade agreements, from which 69 trade agreements were coded and analyzed. Provisions in trade agreements, identified via the aforementioned keywords, were categorized into 6 trade measures. The word counts of the provisions containing; FCTC; were calculated. Chi-square tests were applied to analyze the differences of regulatory patterns between different time frames. The import and export values (USD) of tobacco products under trade agreements containing the term \\\"FCTC\\\" were further collected from the \\\"International Trade Statistics 2001-2020\\\" for understanding the impact of the provision on the trade flow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 69 agreements, the percentage of trade agreements containing keyword as \\\"FCTC\\\" increased significantly from 0% to 2011 to 12% after 2011. A significant decrease of using trade measures as \\\"the exclusion list\\\" was found after 2011 (from 10% to 0). The word counts of provisions containing; FCTC; increased from 24 words in 2011 to 164 words in 2018, and the content of the provisions became more concrete over time. There are six trade agreements containing \\\"FCTC\\\", and all these 6 agreements were ratified by European Union (EU). Despite EU ratified trade agreements with \\\"FCTC\\\", the import and export values of tobacco products between EU and the other party countries increased with time. But the gap of average trade values between trade agreements with and without \\\"FCTC\\\" being widened with time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a first study evaluated the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements, our study results showed that after countries signed trade agreements containing keyword FCTC, the regulatory contents changed significantly. Further studies are recommended to understand the reason and criteria for incorporating FCTC provisions into trade agreements, especially in the EU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Globalization and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Globalization and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00979-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00979-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在分析2001年至2019年《烟草控制公约》框架对贸易协定监管内容的影响,对69个贸易协定进行了编码和分析。通过上述关键词确定的贸易协定条款分为6项贸易措施。条文字数包括:;FCTC;计算。卡方检验用于分析不同时间段之间调节模式的差异。根据包含“烟草控制框架公约”一词的贸易协定,烟草产品的进出口价值(美元)进一步从“2001-2020年国际贸易统计”中收集,以了解该条款对贸易流的影响。结果:在69项协议中,包含“烟草控制框架公约”关键词的贸易协议比例从2011年的0%大幅上升到2011年后的12%。2011年之后,使用贸易措施作为“排除清单”的情况显著减少(从10%降至0)。条款的字数包括:;FCTC;从2011年的24个字增加到2018年的164个字,随着时间的推移,条款的内容变得更加具体。有六项贸易协定包含“烟草控制框架公约”,所有这六项协定都得到了欧盟的批准。尽管欧盟批准了与《烟草控制框架公约》的贸易协议,但欧盟与其他缔约国之间的烟草产品进出口价值随着时间的推移而增加。但随着时间的推移,有《烟草控制框架公约》和没有《烟草控制公约》的贸易协定之间的平均贸易价值差距正在扩大。结论:作为第一项评估《烟草控制框架公约》对贸易协定监管内容影响的研究,我们的研究结果表明,在各国签署包含关键词《烟草控制范围公约》的贸易协定后,监管内容发生了显著变化。建议进行进一步研究,以了解将《烟草控制框架公约》条款纳入贸易协定的原因和标准,尤其是在欧盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trade agreements and tobacco control policy: analysis of the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.

Trade agreements and tobacco control policy: analysis of the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.

Trade agreements and tobacco control policy: analysis of the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.

Trade agreements and tobacco control policy: analysis of the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.

Background: This study aims to analyze the impact of Framework of Convention of Tobacco Control (FCTC) on regulatory contents of trade agreements from 2001 to 2019.

Methods: A search of trade agreements from'WTO Regional Free Trade Agreement Database' using keywords including "tobacco", "cigarette", "smoking" and "FCTC" from May to August 2020 resulted in a total sample of 268 trade agreements, from which 69 trade agreements were coded and analyzed. Provisions in trade agreements, identified via the aforementioned keywords, were categorized into 6 trade measures. The word counts of the provisions containing; FCTC; were calculated. Chi-square tests were applied to analyze the differences of regulatory patterns between different time frames. The import and export values (USD) of tobacco products under trade agreements containing the term "FCTC" were further collected from the "International Trade Statistics 2001-2020" for understanding the impact of the provision on the trade flow.

Results: Among 69 agreements, the percentage of trade agreements containing keyword as "FCTC" increased significantly from 0% to 2011 to 12% after 2011. A significant decrease of using trade measures as "the exclusion list" was found after 2011 (from 10% to 0). The word counts of provisions containing; FCTC; increased from 24 words in 2011 to 164 words in 2018, and the content of the provisions became more concrete over time. There are six trade agreements containing "FCTC", and all these 6 agreements were ratified by European Union (EU). Despite EU ratified trade agreements with "FCTC", the import and export values of tobacco products between EU and the other party countries increased with time. But the gap of average trade values between trade agreements with and without "FCTC" being widened with time.

Conclusions: As a first study evaluated the impact of FCTC on regulatory contents of trade agreements, our study results showed that after countries signed trade agreements containing keyword FCTC, the regulatory contents changed significantly. Further studies are recommended to understand the reason and criteria for incorporating FCTC provisions into trade agreements, especially in the EU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信