儿童心脏外科术后患者心电图与经胸超声心动图无创心输出量监测的比较——一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Raj A Pedgaonkar, Naveen G Singh, Manasa Dhananjaya, P S Nagaraja, K S Nagesh, V Prabhakar
{"title":"儿童心脏外科术后患者心电图与经胸超声心动图无创心输出量监测的比较——一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Raj A Pedgaonkar, Naveen G Singh, Manasa Dhananjaya, P S Nagaraja, K S Nagesh, V Prabhakar","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_9_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study was conducted to validate cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) obtained from electrical cardiometry (EC) ICON <sup>®</sup> with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in postoperative pediatric cardiac surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in 25 pediatric patients with age < 10 years who underwent elective cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>BlandAltman plot was constructed for interchangeability and Polar plot was constructed to know trending ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 datasets were analyzed. Spearman's correlation coefficient for CO between ICON <sup>®</sup> and TTE showed good positive correlation (r = 0.850, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.881, P <.0001). Moderate positive correlation was observed between ICON <sup>®</sup> and TTE for CI (r = 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.515 to 0.674, P <.0001). Linear regression equations for CO and CI between ICON <sup>®</sup> and TTE were: y = 0.5230 + 0.8078 X (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6597, P <.001) and y = 1.8350 + 0.5869 X (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.3985, P <.001) [y- ICON <sup>®</sup>; X - TTE], respectively. BlandAltman plot for CO between ICON <sup>®</sup> and TTE showed a bias of 0.3012 with limits of agreement (LOA) being -0.69 to 1.3 and for CI bias was 0.6939 with LOA-2.1 to 3.5. Polar plot analysis showed an angular bias of 8.1750, with radial LOA being -13.74° to 30.08° for CO and angular bias of 6.6931, with radial LOA being -15.69° to 29.07° for CI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICON <sup>®</sup> monitor-derived parameters are not interchangeable with the values derived from TTE. However, the ICON <sup>®</sup> monitor demonstrated a good trending ability for both CO and CI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":"26 4","pages":"380-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry with transthoracic echocardiography in postoperative paediatric cardiac surgical patients - A prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Raj A Pedgaonkar, Naveen G Singh, Manasa Dhananjaya, P S Nagaraja, K S Nagesh, V Prabhakar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aca.aca_9_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study was conducted to validate cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) obtained from electrical cardiometry (EC) ICON <sup>®</sup> with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in postoperative pediatric cardiac surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in 25 pediatric patients with age < 10 years who underwent elective cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>BlandAltman plot was constructed for interchangeability and Polar plot was constructed to know trending ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 datasets were analyzed. Spearman's correlation coefficient for CO between ICON <sup>®</sup> and TTE showed good positive correlation (r = 0.850, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.881, P <.0001). Moderate positive correlation was observed between ICON <sup>®</sup> and TTE for CI (r = 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.515 to 0.674, P <.0001). Linear regression equations for CO and CI between ICON <sup>®</sup> and TTE were: y = 0.5230 + 0.8078 X (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6597, P <.001) and y = 1.8350 + 0.5869 X (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.3985, P <.001) [y- ICON <sup>®</sup>; X - TTE], respectively. BlandAltman plot for CO between ICON <sup>®</sup> and TTE showed a bias of 0.3012 with limits of agreement (LOA) being -0.69 to 1.3 and for CI bias was 0.6939 with LOA-2.1 to 3.5. Polar plot analysis showed an angular bias of 8.1750, with radial LOA being -13.74° to 30.08° for CO and angular bias of 6.6931, with radial LOA being -15.69° to 29.07° for CI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICON <sup>®</sup> monitor-derived parameters are not interchangeable with the values derived from TTE. However, the ICON <sup>®</sup> monitor demonstrated a good trending ability for both CO and CI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"380-385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691584/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_9_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_9_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在验证儿童心脏外科术后患者的心输出量(CO)和心指数(CI)。材料和方法:对25名年龄<10岁、接受选择性心脏手术的儿童患者进行了前瞻性观察研究。数据分析:BlandAltman图是为了互换性而构建的,Polar图是为了了解趋势能力而构建的。结果:共分析了250个数据集。ICON®和TTE之间CO的Spearman相关系数显示出良好的正相关(r=0.850,95%置信区间0.81至0.881,CI的P®与TTE(r=0.60,95%可信区间0.515至0.674,P®与TTE为:y=0.5230+0.8078 X(R2=0.6597,P2=0.3985,P®;X-TTE]。ICON®和TTE之间CO的BlandAltman图显示出0.3012的偏差,一致性限度(LOA)为-0.69至1.3,CI偏差为0.6939,LOA为-2.1至3.5。极坐标图分析显示,角度偏差为8.1750,CO的径向LOA为-13.74°至30.08°,CI的径向LOA.为-15.69°至29.07°。结论:ICON®监护仪得出的参数与TTE得出的值不可互换。然而,ICON®监测仪显示出良好的CO和CI趋势分析能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry with transthoracic echocardiography in postoperative paediatric cardiac surgical patients - A prospective observational study.

Aim: The present study was conducted to validate cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) obtained from electrical cardiometry (EC) ICON ® with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in postoperative pediatric cardiac surgical patients.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in 25 pediatric patients with age < 10 years who underwent elective cardiac surgery.

Data analysis: BlandAltman plot was constructed for interchangeability and Polar plot was constructed to know trending ability.

Results: A total of 250 datasets were analyzed. Spearman's correlation coefficient for CO between ICON ® and TTE showed good positive correlation (r = 0.850, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.881, P <.0001). Moderate positive correlation was observed between ICON ® and TTE for CI (r = 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.515 to 0.674, P <.0001). Linear regression equations for CO and CI between ICON ® and TTE were: y = 0.5230 + 0.8078 X (R2 = 0.6597, P <.001) and y = 1.8350 + 0.5869 X (R2 = 0.3985, P <.001) [y- ICON ®; X - TTE], respectively. BlandAltman plot for CO between ICON ® and TTE showed a bias of 0.3012 with limits of agreement (LOA) being -0.69 to 1.3 and for CI bias was 0.6939 with LOA-2.1 to 3.5. Polar plot analysis showed an angular bias of 8.1750, with radial LOA being -13.74° to 30.08° for CO and angular bias of 6.6931, with radial LOA being -15.69° to 29.07° for CI.

Conclusion: ICON ® monitor-derived parameters are not interchangeable with the values derived from TTE. However, the ICON ® monitor demonstrated a good trending ability for both CO and CI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信