其他唯物主义:军事挽歌中的人与非人

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
HELIOS Pub Date : 2021-05-11 DOI:10.1353/hel.2020.0004
William Brockliss
{"title":"其他唯物主义:军事挽歌中的人与非人","authors":"William Brockliss","doi":"10.1353/hel.2020.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:New-materialistic studies of early Greek poetry have focused on the Homeric epics and on their intersections with the concepts of \"entanglement\" or the \"assemblage,\" both of which acknowledge the interwovenness of humans and objects. This paper focuses on martial elegy, especially the compositions of Tyrtaeus and Archilochus, and shows that while some passages coincide with new-materialistic descriptions of assemblages, such poems place greater emphasis on the sorts of concepts explored by object-oriented ontologists: the agency of objects, their independence from human control, and human ignorance of object-object interactions.","PeriodicalId":43032,"journal":{"name":"HELIOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/hel.2020.0004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Other Materialisms: Human and Nonhuman in Martial Elegy\",\"authors\":\"William Brockliss\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hel.2020.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:New-materialistic studies of early Greek poetry have focused on the Homeric epics and on their intersections with the concepts of \\\"entanglement\\\" or the \\\"assemblage,\\\" both of which acknowledge the interwovenness of humans and objects. This paper focuses on martial elegy, especially the compositions of Tyrtaeus and Archilochus, and shows that while some passages coincide with new-materialistic descriptions of assemblages, such poems place greater emphasis on the sorts of concepts explored by object-oriented ontologists: the agency of objects, their independence from human control, and human ignorance of object-object interactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HELIOS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/hel.2020.0004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HELIOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2020.0004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HELIOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2020.0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对早期希腊诗歌的新唯物主义研究集中在荷马史诗及其与“纠缠”或“组合”概念的交叉点上,这两个概念都承认人和物体的交织。本文关注的是军事挽歌,尤其是Tyrtaeus和Archilochus的作品,并表明尽管一些段落与新的唯物主义对组合的描述相吻合,但这些诗歌更加强调面向对象本体论者探索的各种概念:物体的能动性、它们独立于人类控制,以及人类对对象-对象交互的无知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Other Materialisms: Human and Nonhuman in Martial Elegy
Abstract:New-materialistic studies of early Greek poetry have focused on the Homeric epics and on their intersections with the concepts of "entanglement" or the "assemblage," both of which acknowledge the interwovenness of humans and objects. This paper focuses on martial elegy, especially the compositions of Tyrtaeus and Archilochus, and shows that while some passages coincide with new-materialistic descriptions of assemblages, such poems place greater emphasis on the sorts of concepts explored by object-oriented ontologists: the agency of objects, their independence from human control, and human ignorance of object-object interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HELIOS
HELIOS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信