柏拉图对话录解读中的透视主义与调和

R. M. Brandão
{"title":"柏拉图对话录解读中的透视主义与调和","authors":"R. M. Brandão","doi":"10.32334/OQNFP.2018N43A625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, a growing number of scholars have questioned the developmental approach to Plato that dominated scholarship during the 20th century. In this context, old strategies of reading the dialogues have been renewed and new approaches proposed. Basically, three different reading strategies the dialogues have been advocated: the still dominant Developmentalism, Unitarianism, and the Literary (or Dramatic) reading. These different approaches are still largely taken as competitors and there seems to be no methodology available that systematically integrates these different readings. In this paper, I work upon the “Perspective reading” proposed by Kahn (2005), and Gonzales (2016) in order to present a methodology that integrates some aspects of these different approaches in a systematic and coherent way. \n-- \nOriginal in English.","PeriodicalId":32937,"journal":{"name":"O Que Nos Faz Pensar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectivism and Conciliation in the Reading of Plato’s Dialogues\",\"authors\":\"R. M. Brandão\",\"doi\":\"10.32334/OQNFP.2018N43A625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent decades, a growing number of scholars have questioned the developmental approach to Plato that dominated scholarship during the 20th century. In this context, old strategies of reading the dialogues have been renewed and new approaches proposed. Basically, three different reading strategies the dialogues have been advocated: the still dominant Developmentalism, Unitarianism, and the Literary (or Dramatic) reading. These different approaches are still largely taken as competitors and there seems to be no methodology available that systematically integrates these different readings. In this paper, I work upon the “Perspective reading” proposed by Kahn (2005), and Gonzales (2016) in order to present a methodology that integrates some aspects of these different approaches in a systematic and coherent way. \\n-- \\nOriginal in English.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"O Que Nos Faz Pensar\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"O Que Nos Faz Pensar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32334/OQNFP.2018N43A625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"O Que Nos Faz Pensar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32334/OQNFP.2018N43A625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,越来越多的学者质疑20世纪学术界主导的柏拉图的发展方法。在这种背景下,阅读对话的旧策略得到了更新,并提出了新的方法。对话主要有三种不同的阅读策略:仍然占主导地位的发展主义、统一主义和文学(或戏剧)阅读。这些不同的方法在很大程度上仍然被视为竞争对手,似乎没有系统地整合这些不同读数的方法。在本文中,我研究了Kahn(2005)和Gonzales(2016)提出的“透视阅读”,以提出一种方法论,以系统和连贯的方式整合这些不同方法的某些方面。——英文原件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectivism and Conciliation in the Reading of Plato’s Dialogues
In recent decades, a growing number of scholars have questioned the developmental approach to Plato that dominated scholarship during the 20th century. In this context, old strategies of reading the dialogues have been renewed and new approaches proposed. Basically, three different reading strategies the dialogues have been advocated: the still dominant Developmentalism, Unitarianism, and the Literary (or Dramatic) reading. These different approaches are still largely taken as competitors and there seems to be no methodology available that systematically integrates these different readings. In this paper, I work upon the “Perspective reading” proposed by Kahn (2005), and Gonzales (2016) in order to present a methodology that integrates some aspects of these different approaches in a systematic and coherent way. -- Original in English.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信