新冠肺炎背景下医生职业选择的道德困境

Q4 Medicine
V. Nikishina, E. Petrash, A. Morgun, Lyubov A. Morgun, T. V. Nedurueva
{"title":"新冠肺炎背景下医生职业选择的道德困境","authors":"V. Nikishina, E. Petrash, A. Morgun, Lyubov A. Morgun, T. V. Nedurueva","doi":"10.47470/0044-197x-2023-67-2-163-171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic has added new semantic trend to the problem of the professional choice of doctors through a change in the conditions of their activities in the direction of intensifying tasks, complicating the possibilities for their implementation, and multiplying the uncertainty of the efforts made. \nThe purpose of the study. Assessing the professional choice of doctors in the context of COVID-19 when solving moral dilemmas. \nMaterial and methods. The total sample size was four hundred twenty nine people (doctors of various surgical and therapeutic specialties) aged of 25–32 years. All doctors had at least 1.5 years of practical experience in COVID-19 conditions. The study was conducted using a questionnaire developed by the author, containing 24 moral dilemmas related to professional decision-making. \nResults. Regardless of the doctor’s profile, professional choice is made in favour of patients of the same gender as the doctor. At the same time, both male and female doctors strive to save young patients (up to 50 years old) with chronic diseases. At the same time, it should be noted that the profile (therapeutic or surgical) of a doctor and his specialty also influence the criteria for choosing professional decisions. Clear criteria in the situation of moral choice have not been established only in the group of ophthalmologists. \nLimitations. Excluded from participation in the study were pediatricians and dentists, as well as doctors who lack professional experience in the context of COVID-19. \nConclusion. As a result of the study, it was found that regardless of the working conditions (in the red zone for COVID-19, in the green zone), both male and female doctors choose in favour of patients of the same gender. At the same time, doctors working in the red zone on COVID-19 make a professional choice in a situation of moral choice in favour of young patients of the same gender with chronic diseases. Physicians working in the green zone make the choice to rescue elderly patients of the same gender as physicians.","PeriodicalId":39241,"journal":{"name":"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional choice as a moral dilemma for doctors in the context of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"V. Nikishina, E. Petrash, A. Morgun, Lyubov A. Morgun, T. V. Nedurueva\",\"doi\":\"10.47470/0044-197x-2023-67-2-163-171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic has added new semantic trend to the problem of the professional choice of doctors through a change in the conditions of their activities in the direction of intensifying tasks, complicating the possibilities for their implementation, and multiplying the uncertainty of the efforts made. \\nThe purpose of the study. Assessing the professional choice of doctors in the context of COVID-19 when solving moral dilemmas. \\nMaterial and methods. The total sample size was four hundred twenty nine people (doctors of various surgical and therapeutic specialties) aged of 25–32 years. All doctors had at least 1.5 years of practical experience in COVID-19 conditions. The study was conducted using a questionnaire developed by the author, containing 24 moral dilemmas related to professional decision-making. \\nResults. Regardless of the doctor’s profile, professional choice is made in favour of patients of the same gender as the doctor. At the same time, both male and female doctors strive to save young patients (up to 50 years old) with chronic diseases. At the same time, it should be noted that the profile (therapeutic or surgical) of a doctor and his specialty also influence the criteria for choosing professional decisions. Clear criteria in the situation of moral choice have not been established only in the group of ophthalmologists. \\nLimitations. Excluded from participation in the study were pediatricians and dentists, as well as doctors who lack professional experience in the context of COVID-19. \\nConclusion. As a result of the study, it was found that regardless of the working conditions (in the red zone for COVID-19, in the green zone), both male and female doctors choose in favour of patients of the same gender. At the same time, doctors working in the red zone on COVID-19 make a professional choice in a situation of moral choice in favour of young patients of the same gender with chronic diseases. Physicians working in the green zone make the choice to rescue elderly patients of the same gender as physicians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197x-2023-67-2-163-171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197x-2023-67-2-163-171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍新冠肺炎大流行使医生的职业选择问题增加了新的语义趋势,因为他们的活动条件朝着强化任务的方向变化,使其实施的可能性复杂化,并增加了所做努力的不确定性。研究目的。评估新冠肺炎背景下医生在解决道德困境时的职业选择。材料和方法。总样本量为429人(各种外科和治疗专业的医生),年龄在25-32岁之间。所有医生都有至少1.5年的新冠肺炎实践经验。这项研究是使用作者开发的问卷进行的,其中包含24个与职业决策有关的道德困境。后果无论医生的个人资料如何,专业选择都有利于与医生性别相同的患者。同时,男性和女性医生都努力挽救患有慢性病的年轻患者(50岁以下)。同时,应该注意的是,医生及其专业的概况(治疗或外科)也会影响选择专业决策的标准。道德选择的明确标准不仅在眼科医生群体中确立。局限性被排除在研究之外的是儿科医生和牙医,以及缺乏新冠肺炎专业经验的医生。结论研究结果发现,无论工作条件如何(新冠肺炎红色区域,绿色区域),男性和女性医生都会选择有利于同性别的患者。与此同时,在新冠肺炎红区工作的医生在道德选择的情况下做出职业选择,有利于患有慢性病的同性别年轻患者。在绿色区域工作的医生可以选择抢救与医生性别相同的老年患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professional choice as a moral dilemma for doctors in the context of COVID-19
Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic has added new semantic trend to the problem of the professional choice of doctors through a change in the conditions of their activities in the direction of intensifying tasks, complicating the possibilities for their implementation, and multiplying the uncertainty of the efforts made. The purpose of the study. Assessing the professional choice of doctors in the context of COVID-19 when solving moral dilemmas. Material and methods. The total sample size was four hundred twenty nine people (doctors of various surgical and therapeutic specialties) aged of 25–32 years. All doctors had at least 1.5 years of practical experience in COVID-19 conditions. The study was conducted using a questionnaire developed by the author, containing 24 moral dilemmas related to professional decision-making. Results. Regardless of the doctor’s profile, professional choice is made in favour of patients of the same gender as the doctor. At the same time, both male and female doctors strive to save young patients (up to 50 years old) with chronic diseases. At the same time, it should be noted that the profile (therapeutic or surgical) of a doctor and his specialty also influence the criteria for choosing professional decisions. Clear criteria in the situation of moral choice have not been established only in the group of ophthalmologists. Limitations. Excluded from participation in the study were pediatricians and dentists, as well as doctors who lack professional experience in the context of COVID-19. Conclusion. As a result of the study, it was found that regardless of the working conditions (in the red zone for COVID-19, in the green zone), both male and female doctors choose in favour of patients of the same gender. At the same time, doctors working in the red zone on COVID-19 make a professional choice in a situation of moral choice in favour of young patients of the same gender with chronic diseases. Physicians working in the green zone make the choice to rescue elderly patients of the same gender as physicians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信