环境责任与企业财务绩效:系统回顾与文献计量分析

IF 0.5 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mohit Verma, M. Mukhtaruddin
{"title":"环境责任与企业财务绩效:系统回顾与文献计量分析","authors":"Mohit Verma, M. Mukhtaruddin","doi":"10.28992/ijsam.v7i1.770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to present a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 512 studies on environmental responsibilities and firm financial performance literature. The study aims to track the research trend and identify the reasons behind heterogeneity in the studied association. The Scopus database was comprehensively searched to collect bibliographic material, giving an overview of contributing and influential research areas, key authors, journals, and countries. Network visualization is used to identify clusters. Content analysis of the literature revealed the essential topics of the investigation. The systematic review revealed that geographical constraints, regulatory constraints, and lack of standardizability are significant reasons for heterogeneity. We identify three major researched areas: a) economic and financial impact, b) innovation, environment management system, and standards, and c) supply chain management development. Discussion on the significant clusters concludes that studies showing positive economic benefits dominate the literature. Overall, the results of different scientific production do not indicate consensus in one direction, but mixed results help to build a new perspective and expand the research horizon. Using a systematic process, this study recognizes the value-creation potential of proactive environmental management practices.","PeriodicalId":41508,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Responsibilities and Firms Financial Performance: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mohit Verma, M. Mukhtaruddin\",\"doi\":\"10.28992/ijsam.v7i1.770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to present a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 512 studies on environmental responsibilities and firm financial performance literature. The study aims to track the research trend and identify the reasons behind heterogeneity in the studied association. The Scopus database was comprehensively searched to collect bibliographic material, giving an overview of contributing and influential research areas, key authors, journals, and countries. Network visualization is used to identify clusters. Content analysis of the literature revealed the essential topics of the investigation. The systematic review revealed that geographical constraints, regulatory constraints, and lack of standardizability are significant reasons for heterogeneity. We identify three major researched areas: a) economic and financial impact, b) innovation, environment management system, and standards, and c) supply chain management development. Discussion on the significant clusters concludes that studies showing positive economic benefits dominate the literature. Overall, the results of different scientific production do not indicate consensus in one direction, but mixed results help to build a new perspective and expand the research horizon. Using a systematic process, this study recognizes the value-creation potential of proactive environmental management practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v7i1.770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v7i1.770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是对512篇关于环境责任和企业财务绩效的研究文献进行系统回顾和文献计量分析。本研究旨在追踪研究趋势,并找出所研究关联中异质性背后的原因。Scopus数据库被全面搜索,以收集书目材料,概述有贡献和有影响力的研究领域、主要作者、期刊和国家。网络可视化用于识别集群。对文献的内容分析揭示了调查的基本主题。系统综述显示,地理限制、监管限制和缺乏标准化是异质性的重要原因。我们确定了三个主要研究领域:a)经济和金融影响,b)创新、环境管理系统和标准,以及c)供应链管理发展。对重要集群的讨论得出结论,显示积极经济效益的研究在文献中占主导地位。总的来说,不同科学成果的结果并不能表明在一个方向上达成了共识,但混合的结果有助于建立新的视角并扩大研究范围。通过一个系统的过程,本研究认识到积极主动的环境管理实践的价值创造潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental Responsibilities and Firms Financial Performance: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
The aim of this study is to present a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 512 studies on environmental responsibilities and firm financial performance literature. The study aims to track the research trend and identify the reasons behind heterogeneity in the studied association. The Scopus database was comprehensively searched to collect bibliographic material, giving an overview of contributing and influential research areas, key authors, journals, and countries. Network visualization is used to identify clusters. Content analysis of the literature revealed the essential topics of the investigation. The systematic review revealed that geographical constraints, regulatory constraints, and lack of standardizability are significant reasons for heterogeneity. We identify three major researched areas: a) economic and financial impact, b) innovation, environment management system, and standards, and c) supply chain management development. Discussion on the significant clusters concludes that studies showing positive economic benefits dominate the literature. Overall, the results of different scientific production do not indicate consensus in one direction, but mixed results help to build a new perspective and expand the research horizon. Using a systematic process, this study recognizes the value-creation potential of proactive environmental management practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信