超越承诺:对契约选择理论的回应

Q3 Social Sciences
P. Saprai
{"title":"超越承诺:对契约选择理论的回应","authors":"P. Saprai","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jly038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is impossible to overestimate the impact and importance that the publication in 1981 of Charles Fried’s Contract as Promise has had on the field of philosophically inclined contract theory. The book was and still is considered seminal. At the time, the very idea of a contract law grounded on liberal premises and as an independent legal category was under sustained attack from the Critical Legal Studies (‘CLS’) movement, which viewed contract law and indeed law generally as an instrument of social control. Like any tool, its value depended on its usefulness for achieving the end to which it was put. Aside from that, it was dispensable.","PeriodicalId":36820,"journal":{"name":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jrls/jly038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving Beyond Promise: A Response to The Choice Theory of Contracts\",\"authors\":\"P. Saprai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrls/jly038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is impossible to overestimate the impact and importance that the publication in 1981 of Charles Fried’s Contract as Promise has had on the field of philosophically inclined contract theory. The book was and still is considered seminal. At the time, the very idea of a contract law grounded on liberal premises and as an independent legal category was under sustained attack from the Critical Legal Studies (‘CLS’) movement, which viewed contract law and indeed law generally as an instrument of social control. Like any tool, its value depended on its usefulness for achieving the end to which it was put. Aside from that, it was dispensable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jrls/jly038\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jly038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jly038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

查尔斯·弗里德1981年出版的《契约即承诺》对哲学倾向的契约理论产生了怎样的影响和重要性都不为过。这本书过去和现在都被认为是开创性的。当时,基于自由前提并作为一个独立法律类别的合同法的理念正受到批判法律研究运动的持续攻击,该运动将合同法乃至法律普遍视为社会控制的工具。与任何工具一样,它的价值取决于它对实现其目的的有用性。除此之外,它是可有可无的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving Beyond Promise: A Response to The Choice Theory of Contracts
It is impossible to overestimate the impact and importance that the publication in 1981 of Charles Fried’s Contract as Promise has had on the field of philosophically inclined contract theory. The book was and still is considered seminal. At the time, the very idea of a contract law grounded on liberal premises and as an independent legal category was under sustained attack from the Critical Legal Studies (‘CLS’) movement, which viewed contract law and indeed law generally as an instrument of social control. Like any tool, its value depended on its usefulness for achieving the end to which it was put. Aside from that, it was dispensable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信