国际商业格局:范式、研究差距和新现实

Caroline Ntara
{"title":"国际商业格局:范式、研究差距和新现实","authors":"Caroline Ntara","doi":"10.1108/itpd-05-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse international business (IB) scholarship and present current gaps and new realities to enhance scholarly discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe paper divides the scholarship into three distinct sections. First, it interrogates the changing definitions of the field from the 1880s to date. Secondly, IB paradigms are cross-examined while highlighting the understudied emerging interaction paradigm. Lastly, literature gaps, methodological gaps and new realities in IB are presented.FindingsThis research shows that IB inquiry has concentrated on firm-level paradigms, leaving the emerging interaction paradigm understudied. As a result, there is a deficit of novel ideas and limited research on critical emerging issues affecting IB. Further, simplistic methodologies are prevalent, making IB scholarship weak. Additionally, a majority of studies concentrate on the Americas, Europe and Asia, leaving Africa understudied.Originality/valueThis research augments the need for scholars to cross-examine the best approach to apply in IB discourse and presents gaps calling for new insights and future research directions.","PeriodicalId":34605,"journal":{"name":"International Trade Politics and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The international business landscape: a look at paradigms, research gaps and new realities\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Ntara\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/itpd-05-2022-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse international business (IB) scholarship and present current gaps and new realities to enhance scholarly discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe paper divides the scholarship into three distinct sections. First, it interrogates the changing definitions of the field from the 1880s to date. Secondly, IB paradigms are cross-examined while highlighting the understudied emerging interaction paradigm. Lastly, literature gaps, methodological gaps and new realities in IB are presented.FindingsThis research shows that IB inquiry has concentrated on firm-level paradigms, leaving the emerging interaction paradigm understudied. As a result, there is a deficit of novel ideas and limited research on critical emerging issues affecting IB. Further, simplistic methodologies are prevalent, making IB scholarship weak. Additionally, a majority of studies concentrate on the Americas, Europe and Asia, leaving Africa understudied.Originality/valueThis research augments the need for scholars to cross-examine the best approach to apply in IB discourse and presents gaps calling for new insights and future research directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Trade Politics and Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Trade Politics and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/itpd-05-2022-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Trade Politics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itpd-05-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文旨在分析国际商业(IB)学术,并提出当前的差距和新的现实,以加强学术话语。设计/方法论/方法本文将学术分为三个不同的部分。首先,它询问了从19世纪80年代至今该领域不断变化的定义。其次,IB范式被交叉检验,同时强调了研究不足的新兴互动范式。最后,介绍了IB的文献空白、方法空白和新的现实。发现这项研究表明,IB调查集中在公司层面的范式上,而新兴的互动范式研究不足。因此,缺乏新颖的想法,对影响IB的关键新兴问题的研究有限。此外,简单化的方法论普遍存在,使IB的学术实力较弱。此外,大多数研究集中在美洲、欧洲和亚洲,而非洲研究不足。原创性/价值这项研究增加了学者对IB话语中应用的最佳方法进行交叉研究的必要性,并提出了需要新见解和未来研究方向的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The international business landscape: a look at paradigms, research gaps and new realities
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse international business (IB) scholarship and present current gaps and new realities to enhance scholarly discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe paper divides the scholarship into three distinct sections. First, it interrogates the changing definitions of the field from the 1880s to date. Secondly, IB paradigms are cross-examined while highlighting the understudied emerging interaction paradigm. Lastly, literature gaps, methodological gaps and new realities in IB are presented.FindingsThis research shows that IB inquiry has concentrated on firm-level paradigms, leaving the emerging interaction paradigm understudied. As a result, there is a deficit of novel ideas and limited research on critical emerging issues affecting IB. Further, simplistic methodologies are prevalent, making IB scholarship weak. Additionally, a majority of studies concentrate on the Americas, Europe and Asia, leaving Africa understudied.Originality/valueThis research augments the need for scholars to cross-examine the best approach to apply in IB discourse and presents gaps calling for new insights and future research directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信