岩溶含水层对地表径流形成的影响:以塞尔维亚雷萨瓦河流域为例

IF 0.2 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marina Mitrašinović, Vesna Ristić Vakanjac, Veljko Marinović, S. Milanović, Ljiljana Vasić, D. Polomcic
{"title":"岩溶含水层对地表径流形成的影响:以塞尔维亚雷萨瓦河流域为例","authors":"Marina Mitrašinović, Vesna Ristić Vakanjac, Veljko Marinović, S. Milanović, Ljiljana Vasić, D. Polomcic","doi":"10.52215/rev.bgs.2022.83.3.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper compares the flow regimes of the Resava River at the gauging stations of the Manasija Monastery (upper course) and the town of Svilajnac (lower course). The hydrological analysis encompasses a multiyear period of monitoring (1982–2020). The water budget and baseflow index are assessed for the catchment areas monitored by the Svilajnac station (683 km2) and the Manasija Monastery station (358k m2), considering the overall monitoring period and characteristic years. The results indicate that the specific runoff in the upper catchment is about 50% higher than that of the entire catchment. The reason is that the upper catchment is 55% karst, whereas the remainder is non-karst. The situation is similar in dry years. However, in wet years the specific runoff of the entire catchment is higher than that of the upper catchment.","PeriodicalId":40733,"journal":{"name":"Spisanie Na B Lgarskoto Geologichesko Druzhestov-Review of the Bulgarian Geological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Karst aquifer impact on the formation of surface runoff: case study of the Resava River catchment, Serbia\",\"authors\":\"Marina Mitrašinović, Vesna Ristić Vakanjac, Veljko Marinović, S. Milanović, Ljiljana Vasić, D. Polomcic\",\"doi\":\"10.52215/rev.bgs.2022.83.3.255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper compares the flow regimes of the Resava River at the gauging stations of the Manasija Monastery (upper course) and the town of Svilajnac (lower course). The hydrological analysis encompasses a multiyear period of monitoring (1982–2020). The water budget and baseflow index are assessed for the catchment areas monitored by the Svilajnac station (683 km2) and the Manasija Monastery station (358k m2), considering the overall monitoring period and characteristic years. The results indicate that the specific runoff in the upper catchment is about 50% higher than that of the entire catchment. The reason is that the upper catchment is 55% karst, whereas the remainder is non-karst. The situation is similar in dry years. However, in wet years the specific runoff of the entire catchment is higher than that of the upper catchment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spisanie Na B Lgarskoto Geologichesko Druzhestov-Review of the Bulgarian Geological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spisanie Na B Lgarskoto Geologichesko Druzhestov-Review of the Bulgarian Geological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52215/rev.bgs.2022.83.3.255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spisanie Na B Lgarskoto Geologichesko Druzhestov-Review of the Bulgarian Geological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52215/rev.bgs.2022.83.3.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了Manasija修道院(上游)和Svilajnac镇(下游)测量站的Resava河的流态。水文分析包括多年监测期(1982-2020年)。考虑到总体监测期和特征年,对Svilajnac站(683 km2)和Manasija修道院站(358k m2)监测的集水区的水量预算和基流指数进行了评估。结果表明,上游流域的比径流量比整个流域高出约50%。原因是上游集水区55%为岩溶,而其余部分为非岩溶。干旱年份的情况类似。然而,在丰水年份,整个集水区的比径流量高于上游集水区的比径流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Karst aquifer impact on the formation of surface runoff: case study of the Resava River catchment, Serbia
The paper compares the flow regimes of the Resava River at the gauging stations of the Manasija Monastery (upper course) and the town of Svilajnac (lower course). The hydrological analysis encompasses a multiyear period of monitoring (1982–2020). The water budget and baseflow index are assessed for the catchment areas monitored by the Svilajnac station (683 km2) and the Manasija Monastery station (358k m2), considering the overall monitoring period and characteristic years. The results indicate that the specific runoff in the upper catchment is about 50% higher than that of the entire catchment. The reason is that the upper catchment is 55% karst, whereas the remainder is non-karst. The situation is similar in dry years. However, in wet years the specific runoff of the entire catchment is higher than that of the upper catchment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信