平等多元主义

IF 2.1 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Daedalus Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1162/daed_a_01963

S. Teles

{"title":"平等多元主义","authors":"S. Teles","doi":"10.1162/daed_a_01963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Alison Gopnik makes a compelling case for care as a matter of social responsibility. A politics of care, however, must address who has the authority to determine the content of care, not just who pays for it. The most attractive ideological vision of a politics of care combines extensive redistribution with a pluralistic recognition of the many different arrangements through which care is provided.","PeriodicalId":47980,"journal":{"name":"Daedalus","volume":"152 1","pages":"77-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Egalitarian Pluralism\",\"authors\":\"S. Teles\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/daed_a_01963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Alison Gopnik makes a compelling case for care as a matter of social responsibility. A politics of care, however, must address who has the authority to determine the content of care, not just who pays for it. The most attractive ideological vision of a politics of care combines extensive redistribution with a pluralistic recognition of the many different arrangements through which care is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Daedalus\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"77-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Daedalus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01963\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daedalus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要Alison Gopnik提出了一个令人信服的理由，将护理视为一种社会责任。然而，护理政治必须解决谁有权决定护理内容，而不仅仅是谁为其付费。护理政治最具吸引力的意识形态愿景是将广泛的再分配与对提供护理的许多不同安排的多元承认相结合。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Egalitarian Pluralism

Abstract Alison Gopnik makes a compelling case for care as a matter of social responsibility. A politics of care, however, must address who has the authority to determine the content of care, not just who pays for it. The most attractive ideological vision of a politics of care combines extensive redistribution with a pluralistic recognition of the many different arrangements through which care is provided.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Daedalus Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Daedalus was founded in 1955 as the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. It draws on the enormous intellectual capacity of the American Academy, whose members are among the nation"s most prominent thinkers in the arts, sciences, and humanities. Each issue addresses a theme with authoritative essays on topics such as judicial independence, reflecting on the humanities, the global nuclear future, the challenge of mass incarceration, the future of news, the economy, the military, and race.