印尼能源供应的可持续性是否具有挑战性?电力成本分析中的燃料类型与外部性

Novena Damar Asri, P. Yusgiantoro
{"title":"印尼能源供应的可持续性是否具有挑战性?电力成本分析中的燃料类型与外部性","authors":"Novena Damar Asri, P. Yusgiantoro","doi":"10.22515/SUSTINERE.JES.V5I2.154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to reveal the challenging sustainability within Indonesia’s energy provision by studying the electricity generating cost (GC) formation, externalities’ effect, and current Indonesia’s electricity and budget condition. In studying GC formation, two variables thought to have remarkable influence are fuel price (represented by Fuel Cost/FC) and operating time, which indicates the power plant’s type (represented by Capacity Factor/CF). The regression results indicate that CF has a greater impact on GC than FC; GC increases as FC increases but decreases as CF increases. FC contributes by 10%-86% of GC, subject to fuel prices and CF. Since coal is the cheapest, GCCoal < GCGas < GCDiesel, but internalizing the externalities triples the GCCoal and doubles the GCDiesel. However, its internalization is challenging as it affects the producers’ and consumers’ welfare. Sustainable energy provision is challenging due to two factors. First, there is a dilemma between applying sustainability principles and providing energy immediately. The fastest route, which is the lowest price orientation, is preferable, indicated by coal domination in the electricity mix. Second, sustainability is not the priority yet, indicated by the environment programs is outside the top ten priority development programs.","PeriodicalId":22187,"journal":{"name":"Sustinere: Journal of Environment and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is sustainability challenging in Indonesia’s energy provision? Fuel type vs. externalities in electricity cost analysis\",\"authors\":\"Novena Damar Asri, P. Yusgiantoro\",\"doi\":\"10.22515/SUSTINERE.JES.V5I2.154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to reveal the challenging sustainability within Indonesia’s energy provision by studying the electricity generating cost (GC) formation, externalities’ effect, and current Indonesia’s electricity and budget condition. In studying GC formation, two variables thought to have remarkable influence are fuel price (represented by Fuel Cost/FC) and operating time, which indicates the power plant’s type (represented by Capacity Factor/CF). The regression results indicate that CF has a greater impact on GC than FC; GC increases as FC increases but decreases as CF increases. FC contributes by 10%-86% of GC, subject to fuel prices and CF. Since coal is the cheapest, GCCoal < GCGas < GCDiesel, but internalizing the externalities triples the GCCoal and doubles the GCDiesel. However, its internalization is challenging as it affects the producers’ and consumers’ welfare. Sustainable energy provision is challenging due to two factors. First, there is a dilemma between applying sustainability principles and providing energy immediately. The fastest route, which is the lowest price orientation, is preferable, indicated by coal domination in the electricity mix. Second, sustainability is not the priority yet, indicated by the environment programs is outside the top ten priority development programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustinere: Journal of Environment and Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustinere: Journal of Environment and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22515/SUSTINERE.JES.V5I2.154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustinere: Journal of Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22515/SUSTINERE.JES.V5I2.154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在通过研究发电成本(GC)的形成、外部性效应以及印尼当前的电力和预算状况,揭示印尼能源供应中具有挑战性的可持续性。在研究GC形成时,两个被认为具有显著影响的变量是燃料价格(以燃料成本/FC表示)和运行时间,这表明了发电厂的类型(以容量因数/CF表示)。回归结果表明,CF对GC的影响大于FC;GC随着FC的增加而增加,但随着CF的增加而减少。FC占GC的10%-86%,取决于燃料价格和CF。由于煤炭是最便宜的,GCCoal<GCGas<GCDiesel,但外部性的内部化使GCCoal增加了三倍,使GCDiesel增加了一倍。然而,其内部化具有挑战性,因为它影响到生产者和消费者的福利。由于两个因素,可持续能源供应具有挑战性。首先,在应用可持续性原则和立即提供能源之间存在两难选择。最快的路线,即最低的价格取向,是优选的,这表明煤炭在电力结构中占主导地位。第二,可持续性还不是优先事项,表明环境项目不在十大优先发展项目之列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is sustainability challenging in Indonesia’s energy provision? Fuel type vs. externalities in electricity cost analysis
This study aims to reveal the challenging sustainability within Indonesia’s energy provision by studying the electricity generating cost (GC) formation, externalities’ effect, and current Indonesia’s electricity and budget condition. In studying GC formation, two variables thought to have remarkable influence are fuel price (represented by Fuel Cost/FC) and operating time, which indicates the power plant’s type (represented by Capacity Factor/CF). The regression results indicate that CF has a greater impact on GC than FC; GC increases as FC increases but decreases as CF increases. FC contributes by 10%-86% of GC, subject to fuel prices and CF. Since coal is the cheapest, GCCoal < GCGas < GCDiesel, but internalizing the externalities triples the GCCoal and doubles the GCDiesel. However, its internalization is challenging as it affects the producers’ and consumers’ welfare. Sustainable energy provision is challenging due to two factors. First, there is a dilemma between applying sustainability principles and providing energy immediately. The fastest route, which is the lowest price orientation, is preferable, indicated by coal domination in the electricity mix. Second, sustainability is not the priority yet, indicated by the environment programs is outside the top ten priority development programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信