新冠肺炎期间的痛苦和复原力：以色列、巴西和菲律宾样本的国际研究

IF 2.3 3区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Cross-Cultural Research Pub Date : 2021-07-08 DOI:10.1177/10693971211026806

S. Kimhi, Y. Eshel, B. Adini, J. J. B. Aruta, B. Antazo, Alelie Briones-Diato, M. Reinert, Juliano Domingues Da Silva, F. Verdu, Hadas Marciano

{"title":"新冠肺炎期间的痛苦和复原力：以色列、巴西和菲律宾样本的国际研究","authors":"S. Kimhi, Y. Eshel, B. Adini, J. J. B. Aruta, B. Antazo, Alelie Briones-Diato, M. Reinert, Juliano Domingues Da Silva, F. Verdu, Hadas Marciano","doi":"10.1177/10693971211026806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared three types of resilience (individual, community, and national resilience), two indicators of distress (sense of danger and distress symptoms) and wellbeing, among samples from Israel, Brazil, and the Philippines, during the “first-wave” of COVID-19 pandemic. Though significant differences were found among the samples regarding all variables, similarities were also emerged. Individual resilience and wellbeing negatively predicted distress symptoms in each sample, and women of all samples reported higher level of distress-symptoms compared with men. The differences between the samples are presented and discussed. Understanding the similarities and the differences, between these cultures, may help developing efficient countermeasures tailored to each country. This knowledge may promote efficient health policy to foster people’s ability to cope with the hardship and to prevent future psychological and health implications.","PeriodicalId":47154,"journal":{"name":"Cross-Cultural Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"415 - 437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10693971211026806","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distress and Resilience in Days of COVID-19: International Study of Samples from Israel, Brazil, and the Philippines\",\"authors\":\"S. Kimhi, Y. Eshel, B. Adini, J. J. B. Aruta, B. Antazo, Alelie Briones-Diato, M. Reinert, Juliano Domingues Da Silva, F. Verdu, Hadas Marciano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10693971211026806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compared three types of resilience (individual, community, and national resilience), two indicators of distress (sense of danger and distress symptoms) and wellbeing, among samples from Israel, Brazil, and the Philippines, during the “first-wave” of COVID-19 pandemic. Though significant differences were found among the samples regarding all variables, similarities were also emerged. Individual resilience and wellbeing negatively predicted distress symptoms in each sample, and women of all samples reported higher level of distress-symptoms compared with men. The differences between the samples are presented and discussed. Understanding the similarities and the differences, between these cultures, may help developing efficient countermeasures tailored to each country. This knowledge may promote efficient health policy to foster people’s ability to cope with the hardship and to prevent future psychological and health implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cross-Cultural Research\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"415 - 437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10693971211026806\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cross-Cultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971211026806\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-Cultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971211026806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

摘要

在新冠肺炎“第一波”大流行期间，我们比较了以色列、巴西和菲律宾样本中的三种类型的复原力（个人、社区和国家复原力）、两种痛苦指标（危险感和痛苦症状）和幸福感。尽管在所有变量的样本中都发现了显著的差异，但也出现了相似之处。个体的复原力和幸福感对每个样本的痛苦症状都有负面预测，所有样本中的女性报告的痛苦症状水平都高于男性。介绍并讨论了样品之间的差异。了解这些文化之间的相似之处和差异，可能有助于制定针对每个国家的有效对策。这些知识可以促进有效的卫生政策，以培养人们应对困难的能力，并防止未来的心理和健康影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Distress and Resilience in Days of COVID-19: International Study of Samples from Israel, Brazil, and the Philippines

We compared three types of resilience (individual, community, and national resilience), two indicators of distress (sense of danger and distress symptoms) and wellbeing, among samples from Israel, Brazil, and the Philippines, during the “first-wave” of COVID-19 pandemic. Though significant differences were found among the samples regarding all variables, similarities were also emerged. Individual resilience and wellbeing negatively predicted distress symptoms in each sample, and women of all samples reported higher level of distress-symptoms compared with men. The differences between the samples are presented and discussed. Understanding the similarities and the differences, between these cultures, may help developing efficient countermeasures tailored to each country. This knowledge may promote efficient health policy to foster people’s ability to cope with the hardship and to prevent future psychological and health implications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cross-Cultural Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

8.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Cross-Cultural Research, formerly Behavior Science Research, is sponsored by the Human Relations Area Files, Inc. (HRAF) and is the official journal of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research. The mission of the journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles describing cross-cultural or comparative studies in all the social/behavioral sciences and other sciences dealing with humans, including anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science, economics, human ecology, and evolutionary biology. Worldwide cross-cultural studies are particularly welcomed, but all kinds of systematic comparisons are acceptable so long as they deal explicity with cross-cultural issues pertaining to the constraints and variables of human behavior.