传统与档案之间的集体记忆:Josip Mantuani、Heimatschutz与纪念碑保护

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katja Mahnič
{"title":"传统与档案之间的集体记忆:Josip Mantuani、Heimatschutz与纪念碑保护","authors":"Katja Mahnič","doi":"10.4312/ars.13.1.205-218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1911, Josip Mantuani attended a joint meeting for monument protection and Heimatschutz (homeland protection) in Salzburg, which he covered extensively in the Slovenec newspaper. Even though his practice as a member of the Monument Council and director of the Provincial Museum undoubtedly centred on the protection of historical monuments, he was also well acquainted with Heimatschutz. This is clearly shown in his text “Domovinsko varstvo” (Heimatschutz), which he published in the scientific journal Čas in 1914. The two aforementioned texts, along with his five-instalment feuilleton on the modern principles of monument protection, which he published in the Slovenec newspaper in late 1909, provide a good insight into Mantuani’s understanding of the mutual relationship between monument protection and Heimatschutz. In all three texts one can clearly discern that Mantuani distinguished between monuments that were still rooted in the existing tradition through their character, form and content, and those he viewed as “silent witnesses” to past cultures, or, in other words, as historical sources. He attributed “a living cultural” role to the former, while viewing the latter as “archival material”.","PeriodicalId":40773,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Memory between Tradition and Archive: Josip Mantuani, Heimatschutz and Monument Protection\",\"authors\":\"Katja Mahnič\",\"doi\":\"10.4312/ars.13.1.205-218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1911, Josip Mantuani attended a joint meeting for monument protection and Heimatschutz (homeland protection) in Salzburg, which he covered extensively in the Slovenec newspaper. Even though his practice as a member of the Monument Council and director of the Provincial Museum undoubtedly centred on the protection of historical monuments, he was also well acquainted with Heimatschutz. This is clearly shown in his text “Domovinsko varstvo” (Heimatschutz), which he published in the scientific journal Čas in 1914. The two aforementioned texts, along with his five-instalment feuilleton on the modern principles of monument protection, which he published in the Slovenec newspaper in late 1909, provide a good insight into Mantuani’s understanding of the mutual relationship between monument protection and Heimatschutz. In all three texts one can clearly discern that Mantuani distinguished between monuments that were still rooted in the existing tradition through their character, form and content, and those he viewed as “silent witnesses” to past cultures, or, in other words, as historical sources. He attributed “a living cultural” role to the former, while viewing the latter as “archival material”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars & Humanitas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars & Humanitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.13.1.205-218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars & Humanitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.13.1.205-218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1911年,Josip Mantuani参加了在萨尔茨堡举行的纪念碑保护和Heimatschutz(国土保护)联席会议,他在斯洛文尼亚报纸上对此进行了广泛报道。尽管他作为纪念碑委员会成员和省博物馆馆长的工作无疑是以保护历史纪念碑为中心,但他也非常熟悉Heimatschutz。这一点在他1914年发表在科学期刊Čas上的著作《多莫文斯科·瓦尔斯特沃》(Heimatschutz)中得到了明确的体现。上述两篇文本,以及他于1909年末在斯洛文尼亚报纸上发表的关于纪念碑保护的现代原则的五期《费伊尔顿》,很好地洞察了曼图瓦尼对纪念碑保护与海马特舒茨之间相互关系的理解。在这三本书中,人们可以清楚地看出,曼图阿尼区分了那些仍然通过其特征、形式和内容植根于现有传统的纪念碑,以及那些他认为是过去文化的“无声见证者”,或者换句话说,是历史来源的纪念碑。他将前者视为“活的文化”角色,而将后者视为“档案材料”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collective Memory between Tradition and Archive: Josip Mantuani, Heimatschutz and Monument Protection
In 1911, Josip Mantuani attended a joint meeting for monument protection and Heimatschutz (homeland protection) in Salzburg, which he covered extensively in the Slovenec newspaper. Even though his practice as a member of the Monument Council and director of the Provincial Museum undoubtedly centred on the protection of historical monuments, he was also well acquainted with Heimatschutz. This is clearly shown in his text “Domovinsko varstvo” (Heimatschutz), which he published in the scientific journal Čas in 1914. The two aforementioned texts, along with his five-instalment feuilleton on the modern principles of monument protection, which he published in the Slovenec newspaper in late 1909, provide a good insight into Mantuani’s understanding of the mutual relationship between monument protection and Heimatschutz. In all three texts one can clearly discern that Mantuani distinguished between monuments that were still rooted in the existing tradition through their character, form and content, and those he viewed as “silent witnesses” to past cultures, or, in other words, as historical sources. He attributed “a living cultural” role to the former, while viewing the latter as “archival material”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ars & Humanitas
Ars & Humanitas HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信