使用改进的德尔菲方法制定急性医学质量改进的优先事项——由急性医学质量改善委员会（SAM-QI）主持的共识过程。

Q3 Medicine

Acute Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.52964/AMJA.0901

A. Kennedy, M. Holland, P. Sullivan, A. Gebril, N. Arora, V. Vijayakumar, A. Hoole, C. Nickel, C. Hodcroft, L. Harrington, M. Wheble, J. Soong, N. Scriven, J. Kellett, K. Slinger, V. Price, J. Alsma, S. Astbury, R. Varia, A. Rigby, C. Subbe

{"title":"使用改进的德尔菲方法制定急性医学质量改进的优先事项——由急性医学质量改善委员会（SAM-QI）主持的共识过程。","authors":"A. Kennedy, M. Holland, P. Sullivan, A. Gebril, N. Arora, V. Vijayakumar, A. Hoole, C. Nickel, C. Hodcroft, L. Harrington, M. Wheble, J. Soong, N. Scriven, J. Kellett, K. Slinger, V. Price, J. Alsma, S. Astbury, R. Varia, A. Rigby, C. Subbe","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe SAM Quality Improvement Committee (SAM-QI), set up in 2016, has worked over the last year to determine the priority Acute Medicine QI topics. They have also discussed and put forward proposals to improve QI training for Acute Medicine professionals.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA modified Delphi process was completed over four rounds to determine priority QI topics. Online meetings were also used to develop proposals for QI training.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSame Day Emergency Care (SDEC) was chosen as the priority topic for QI work within Acute Medicine.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe SAM-QI group settled on SDEC being the priority topic for Acute Medicine QI development. Throughout the Delphi process SAM-QI has also developed proposals for QI training that will help Acute Medicine professionals deliver coordinated meaningful improvements in care.","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":"21 2 1","pages":"74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing priorities for quality improvement in acute medicine using a modified Delphi method A consensus process hosted by the Society for Acute Medicine Quality Improvement Committee (SAM-QI).\",\"authors\":\"A. Kennedy, M. Holland, P. Sullivan, A. Gebril, N. Arora, V. Vijayakumar, A. Hoole, C. Nickel, C. Hodcroft, L. Harrington, M. Wheble, J. Soong, N. Scriven, J. Kellett, K. Slinger, V. Price, J. Alsma, S. Astbury, R. Varia, A. Rigby, C. Subbe\",\"doi\":\"10.52964/AMJA.0901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nThe SAM Quality Improvement Committee (SAM-QI), set up in 2016, has worked over the last year to determine the priority Acute Medicine QI topics. They have also discussed and put forward proposals to improve QI training for Acute Medicine professionals.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA modified Delphi process was completed over four rounds to determine priority QI topics. Online meetings were also used to develop proposals for QI training.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSame Day Emergency Care (SDEC) was chosen as the priority topic for QI work within Acute Medicine.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe SAM-QI group settled on SDEC being the priority topic for Acute Medicine QI development. Throughout the Delphi process SAM-QI has also developed proposals for QI training that will help Acute Medicine professionals deliver coordinated meaningful improvements in care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"volume\":\"21 2 1\",\"pages\":\"74-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

简介SAM质量改进委员会（SAM-QI）成立于2016年，在过去一年中一直致力于确定急性医学QI的优先主题。他们还讨论并提出了改进急性医学专业人员QI培训的建议。方法对德尔菲过程进行了四轮改进，以确定优先QI主题。在线会议也被用来制定QI培训的建议。结果选择日间急救（SDEC）作为急性医学QI工作的优先主题。结论SAM-QI小组确定SDEC是急性医学QI发展的优先课题。在整个德尔菲过程中，SAM-QI还制定了QI培训建议，帮助急性医学专业人员在护理方面提供协调一致的有意义的改进。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Developing priorities for quality improvement in acute medicine using a modified Delphi method A consensus process hosted by the Society for Acute Medicine Quality Improvement Committee (SAM-QI).

INTRODUCTION The SAM Quality Improvement Committee (SAM-QI), set up in 2016, has worked over the last year to determine the priority Acute Medicine QI topics. They have also discussed and put forward proposals to improve QI training for Acute Medicine professionals. METHODS A modified Delphi process was completed over four rounds to determine priority QI topics. Online meetings were also used to develop proposals for QI training. RESULTS Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) was chosen as the priority topic for QI work within Acute Medicine. CONCLUSION The SAM-QI group settled on SDEC being the priority topic for Acute Medicine QI development. Throughout the Delphi process SAM-QI has also developed proposals for QI training that will help Acute Medicine professionals deliver coordinated meaningful improvements in care.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Acute Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： These are usually commissioned by the editorial team in accordance with a cycle running over several years. Authors wishing to submit a review relevant to Acute Medicine are advised to contact the editor before writing this. Unsolicited review articles received for consideration may be included if the subject matter is considered of interest to the readership, provided the topic has not already been covered in a recent edition. Review articles are usually 3000-5000 words and may include tables, pictures and other figures as required for the text. Include 3 or 4 ‘key points’ summarising the main teaching messages.