宗教/世界观与教育关系比较研究的适当方法论引论

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
S. Miedema
{"title":"宗教/世界观与教育关系比较研究的适当方法论引论","authors":"S. Miedema","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2021.2006545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this postlude, I meta-reflect on the six articles of this special issue. All authors of the research collective have taken the methodology which Oddrun Bråten has developed for comparative studies as a kind of methodological starting point for their own research. My searchlight are two connected questions. Are the comparative methodologies used fruitful in grasping adequately the past and present interrelationships of religion and education in a particular context? How to avoid that traditional views, policies and practices will hinder a clear sight on the actual facts-of-a-case?","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"477 - 489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Postlude on Adequate Methodologies for Comparative Research regarding the Relation of Religion/Worldview and Education\",\"authors\":\"S. Miedema\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15507394.2021.2006545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this postlude, I meta-reflect on the six articles of this special issue. All authors of the research collective have taken the methodology which Oddrun Bråten has developed for comparative studies as a kind of methodological starting point for their own research. My searchlight are two connected questions. Are the comparative methodologies used fruitful in grasping adequately the past and present interrelationships of religion and education in a particular context? How to avoid that traditional views, policies and practices will hinder a clear sight on the actual facts-of-a-case?\",\"PeriodicalId\":43359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion & Education\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"477 - 489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2021.2006545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2021.2006545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在这篇结语中,我对本期特刊的六篇文章进行了元反思。研究小组的所有作者都将Oddrun Bråten为比较研究开发的方法论作为他们自己研究的一种方法论起点。我的探照灯是两个相互关联的问题。所使用的比较方法在充分把握特定背景下宗教和教育过去和现在的相互关系方面是否富有成效?如何避免传统的观点、政策和做法会阻碍对具体情况的清晰了解?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Postlude on Adequate Methodologies for Comparative Research regarding the Relation of Religion/Worldview and Education
Abstract In this postlude, I meta-reflect on the six articles of this special issue. All authors of the research collective have taken the methodology which Oddrun Bråten has developed for comparative studies as a kind of methodological starting point for their own research. My searchlight are two connected questions. Are the comparative methodologies used fruitful in grasping adequately the past and present interrelationships of religion and education in a particular context? How to avoid that traditional views, policies and practices will hinder a clear sight on the actual facts-of-a-case?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信