口服咪达唑仑和口服三氯芬钠对儿童清醒镇静效果的比较研究

Q4 Nursing
J. Prakash, Partha Ghosh, L. Tudu, P. Shrivastava, Anupa Prasad, S. Priye
{"title":"口服咪达唑仑和口服三氯芬钠对儿童清醒镇静效果的比较研究","authors":"J. Prakash, Partha Ghosh, L. Tudu, P. Shrivastava, Anupa Prasad, S. Priye","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_136_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Behavioral management and carrying out surgical procedures for very young, uncooperative, anxious children can be challenging. It is usually encountered in children below the age of 6 years due to the following contributing factors such as immature reasoning, anxiety, fear, and inadequate coping skills. The goal of the study was to compare the efficacy of oral midazolam and oral triclofos sodium for conscious sedation in pediatric group of patients before elective surgeries. Materials and Methods: This prospective, single- blinded, randomized controlled, comparative study was conducted in 60 patients aged 2–8 years who were scheduled for elective surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: M and T of 30 children each, where group M received 0.5 mg//kg midazolam and group T received 75 mg/kg triclofos sodium, orally, 60 min prior to anesthetic induction. The hemodynamics, acceptability of drugs, depth of sedation, and anxiety during separation from parents were assessed. Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, and Student’s t test were applied to find significance. Results: The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and oxygen saturation at baseline to 60 min in groups M and T showed no significant difference between groups. Triclofos sodium has better acceptability over oral midazolam, whereas oral midazolam has better sedative properties over oral triclofos sodium. Conclusion: Oral midazolam was found to be more effective premedication and may be preferred over triclofos sodium due to the rapid and better sedative effect as well as good anxiolysis properties.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on the efficacy of oral midazolam and oral triclofos sodium for conscious sedation in pediatric group of patients\",\"authors\":\"J. Prakash, Partha Ghosh, L. Tudu, P. Shrivastava, Anupa Prasad, S. Priye\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_136_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Behavioral management and carrying out surgical procedures for very young, uncooperative, anxious children can be challenging. It is usually encountered in children below the age of 6 years due to the following contributing factors such as immature reasoning, anxiety, fear, and inadequate coping skills. The goal of the study was to compare the efficacy of oral midazolam and oral triclofos sodium for conscious sedation in pediatric group of patients before elective surgeries. Materials and Methods: This prospective, single- blinded, randomized controlled, comparative study was conducted in 60 patients aged 2–8 years who were scheduled for elective surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: M and T of 30 children each, where group M received 0.5 mg//kg midazolam and group T received 75 mg/kg triclofos sodium, orally, 60 min prior to anesthetic induction. The hemodynamics, acceptability of drugs, depth of sedation, and anxiety during separation from parents were assessed. Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, and Student’s t test were applied to find significance. Results: The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and oxygen saturation at baseline to 60 min in groups M and T showed no significant difference between groups. Triclofos sodium has better acceptability over oral midazolam, whereas oral midazolam has better sedative properties over oral triclofos sodium. Conclusion: Oral midazolam was found to be more effective premedication and may be preferred over triclofos sodium due to the rapid and better sedative effect as well as good anxiolysis properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_136_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_136_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对非常年幼、不合作、焦虑的儿童进行行为管理和手术可能具有挑战性。它通常发生在6岁以下的儿童身上,原因如下:推理不成熟、焦虑、恐惧和应对能力不足。本研究的目的是比较选择性手术前口服咪达唑仑和口服三氯福钠对儿科患者清醒镇静的疗效。材料和方法:这项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照的比较研究对60名年龄在2-8岁的择期手术患者进行了研究。患者被随机分为两组:M组和T组各30名儿童,其中M组在麻醉诱导前60分钟接受0.5mg/kg咪达唑仑,T组在麻醉前60分钟口服75mg/kg三氯福钠。评估了血液动力学、药物的可接受性、镇静深度和与父母分离期间的焦虑。应用Fisher精确检验、卡方检验和Student t检验来寻找显著性。结果:M组和T组在基线至60min时的平均收缩压和舒张压、心率、呼吸率和血氧饱和度在两组之间没有显著差异。与口服咪达唑仑相比,三氯芬钠具有更好的可接受性,而口服咪达咪唑仑具有更好的镇静特性。结论:口服咪达唑仑是一种更有效的术前用药方法,由于其具有快速、更好的镇静作用和良好的抗焦虑特性,可能优于三氯芬钠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study on the efficacy of oral midazolam and oral triclofos sodium for conscious sedation in pediatric group of patients
Background: Behavioral management and carrying out surgical procedures for very young, uncooperative, anxious children can be challenging. It is usually encountered in children below the age of 6 years due to the following contributing factors such as immature reasoning, anxiety, fear, and inadequate coping skills. The goal of the study was to compare the efficacy of oral midazolam and oral triclofos sodium for conscious sedation in pediatric group of patients before elective surgeries. Materials and Methods: This prospective, single- blinded, randomized controlled, comparative study was conducted in 60 patients aged 2–8 years who were scheduled for elective surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: M and T of 30 children each, where group M received 0.5 mg//kg midazolam and group T received 75 mg/kg triclofos sodium, orally, 60 min prior to anesthetic induction. The hemodynamics, acceptability of drugs, depth of sedation, and anxiety during separation from parents were assessed. Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, and Student’s t test were applied to find significance. Results: The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and oxygen saturation at baseline to 60 min in groups M and T showed no significant difference between groups. Triclofos sodium has better acceptability over oral midazolam, whereas oral midazolam has better sedative properties over oral triclofos sodium. Conclusion: Oral midazolam was found to be more effective premedication and may be preferred over triclofos sodium due to the rapid and better sedative effect as well as good anxiolysis properties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信