现实世界新冠肺炎疫苗对德尔塔和奥密克戎地区感染的保护率

IF 11 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Y. Zhu, Jie Gu, Y. Qiu, S. Chen
{"title":"现实世界新冠肺炎疫苗对德尔塔和奥密克戎地区感染的保护率","authors":"Y. Zhu, Jie Gu, Y. Qiu, S. Chen","doi":"10.1101/2022.09.01.22279492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The real-world protection rates of vaccination (VPRs) against the SARS-Cov-2 infection are critical in formulating future vaccination strategies against the virus. Based on a varying coefficient stochastic epidemic model, we obtain seven countries' real-world VPRs using daily epidemiological and vaccination data, and find that the VPRs improved with more vaccine doses. The average VPR of the full vaccination was 82% (SE: 4%) and 61% (SE: 3%) in the pre-Delta and Delta-dominated periods, respectively. The Omicron variant reduced the average VPR of the full vaccination to 39% (SE: 2%). However, the booster dose restored the VPR to 63% (SE: 1%) which was significantly above the 50% threshold in the Omicron-dominated period. Scenario analyses show that the existing vaccination strategies have significantly delayed and reduced the timing and the magnitude of the infection peaks, respectively, and doubling the existing booster coverage would lead to 29% fewer confirmed cases and 17% fewer deaths in the seven countries compared to the outcomes at the existing booster taking rates. These call for higher full vaccine and booster coverage for all countries.","PeriodicalId":21120,"journal":{"name":"Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World COVID-19 Vaccine Protection Rates against Infection in the Delta and Omicron Eras\",\"authors\":\"Y. Zhu, Jie Gu, Y. Qiu, S. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2022.09.01.22279492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The real-world protection rates of vaccination (VPRs) against the SARS-Cov-2 infection are critical in formulating future vaccination strategies against the virus. Based on a varying coefficient stochastic epidemic model, we obtain seven countries' real-world VPRs using daily epidemiological and vaccination data, and find that the VPRs improved with more vaccine doses. The average VPR of the full vaccination was 82% (SE: 4%) and 61% (SE: 3%) in the pre-Delta and Delta-dominated periods, respectively. The Omicron variant reduced the average VPR of the full vaccination to 39% (SE: 2%). However, the booster dose restored the VPR to 63% (SE: 1%) which was significantly above the 50% threshold in the Omicron-dominated period. Scenario analyses show that the existing vaccination strategies have significantly delayed and reduced the timing and the magnitude of the infection peaks, respectively, and doubling the existing booster coverage would lead to 29% fewer confirmed cases and 17% fewer deaths in the seven countries compared to the outcomes at the existing booster taking rates. These call for higher full vaccine and booster coverage for all countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.01.22279492\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.01.22279492","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫苗接种对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染的真实保护率对于制定未来的疫苗接种策略至关重要。基于变系数随机流行病模型,我们使用每日流行病学和疫苗接种数据获得了七个国家的真实VPR,并发现随着疫苗剂量的增加,VPR有所改善。在德尔塔之前和德尔塔占主导地位的时期,完全接种疫苗的平均VPR分别为82%(SE:4%)和61%(SE:3%)。奥密克戎变异株使完全接种疫苗的平均VPR降至39%(SE:2%)。然而,加强剂量使VPR恢复到63%(SE:1%),显著高于奥密克戎占主导地位时期50%的阈值。情景分析显示,现有的疫苗接种策略分别显著推迟和减少了感染高峰的时间和程度,与现有加强针接种率相比,将现有加强针覆盖率提高一倍将使这七个国家的确诊病例减少29%,死亡人数减少17%。这些呼吁提高所有国家的疫苗和加强针的全面覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World COVID-19 Vaccine Protection Rates against Infection in the Delta and Omicron Eras
The real-world protection rates of vaccination (VPRs) against the SARS-Cov-2 infection are critical in formulating future vaccination strategies against the virus. Based on a varying coefficient stochastic epidemic model, we obtain seven countries' real-world VPRs using daily epidemiological and vaccination data, and find that the VPRs improved with more vaccine doses. The average VPR of the full vaccination was 82% (SE: 4%) and 61% (SE: 3%) in the pre-Delta and Delta-dominated periods, respectively. The Omicron variant reduced the average VPR of the full vaccination to 39% (SE: 2%). However, the booster dose restored the VPR to 63% (SE: 1%) which was significantly above the 50% threshold in the Omicron-dominated period. Scenario analyses show that the existing vaccination strategies have significantly delayed and reduced the timing and the magnitude of the infection peaks, respectively, and doubling the existing booster coverage would lead to 29% fewer confirmed cases and 17% fewer deaths in the seven countries compared to the outcomes at the existing booster taking rates. These call for higher full vaccine and booster coverage for all countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research
Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Research serves as a global platform for academic exchange, collaboration, and technological advancements. This journal welcomes high-quality research contributions from any domain, with open arms to authors from around the globe. Comprising fundamental research in the life and physical sciences, Research also highlights significant findings and issues in engineering and applied science. The journal proudly features original research articles, reviews, perspectives, and editorials, fostering a diverse and dynamic scholarly environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信