民族性是一种工具，民族政策是一种实践：以斯塔夫罗波尔·克拉伊为例

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES

Caucasus Survey Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI:10.1080/23761199.2020.1776957

N. Silaev

{"title":"民族性是一种工具，民族政策是一种实践：以斯塔夫罗波尔·克拉伊为例","authors":"N. Silaev","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2020.1776957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article examines contemporary nationalities policy in Russia, based on a case study of Stavropol krai in the northern Caucasus. In order to reveal the informal mechanisms of nationalities policy this research analyses the practices of the ethnic group-making used by the regional bureaucracy. The key argument is that the ethnic divisions, rather than being embedded within the society as everyday social categorizations, are imposed by the bureaucracy in order to make social space more transparent and manageable. The resulting use of ethnicity as a political tool has much in common with the Soviet approach in this field. However, unlike the Soviet nationalities policy, in today’s Russia ethnicity is not pervasive, and the nationalities policy as described is directed only at a small share of the population.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":"8 1","pages":"196 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2020.1776957","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnicity as a tool and nationalities policy as practice: the case of Stavropol krai\",\"authors\":\"N. Silaev\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23761199.2020.1776957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The article examines contemporary nationalities policy in Russia, based on a case study of Stavropol krai in the northern Caucasus. In order to reveal the informal mechanisms of nationalities policy this research analyses the practices of the ethnic group-making used by the regional bureaucracy. The key argument is that the ethnic divisions, rather than being embedded within the society as everyday social categorizations, are imposed by the bureaucracy in order to make social space more transparent and manageable. The resulting use of ethnicity as a political tool has much in common with the Soviet approach in this field. However, unlike the Soviet nationalities policy, in today’s Russia ethnicity is not pervasive, and the nationalities policy as described is directed only at a small share of the population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caucasus Survey\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"196 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2020.1776957\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caucasus Survey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2020.1776957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caucasus Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2020.1776957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文以北高加索斯塔夫罗波尔边疆区为例，考察了俄罗斯当代民族政策。为了揭示民族政策的非正式机制，本研究分析了地方官僚机构利用民族政策的实践。关键的论点是，种族划分不是作为日常社会分类嵌入社会，而是由官僚机构强加的，目的是使社会空间更加透明和可管理。由此产生的将种族作为政治工具的做法与苏联在这一领域的做法有很多共同之处。然而，与苏联的民族政策不同，在今天的俄罗斯，种族并不普遍，所描述的民族政策只针对一小部分人口。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Ethnicity as a tool and nationalities policy as practice: the case of Stavropol krai

ABSTRACT The article examines contemporary nationalities policy in Russia, based on a case study of Stavropol krai in the northern Caucasus. In order to reveal the informal mechanisms of nationalities policy this research analyses the practices of the ethnic group-making used by the regional bureaucracy. The key argument is that the ethnic divisions, rather than being embedded within the society as everyday social categorizations, are imposed by the bureaucracy in order to make social space more transparent and manageable. The resulting use of ethnicity as a political tool has much in common with the Soviet approach in this field. However, unlike the Soviet nationalities policy, in today’s Russia ethnicity is not pervasive, and the nationalities policy as described is directed only at a small share of the population.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Caucasus Survey Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Caucasus Survey is a new peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary and independent journal, concerned with the study of the Caucasus – the independent republics of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, de facto entities in the area and the North Caucasian republics and regions of the Russian Federation. Also covered are issues relating to the Republic of Kalmykia, Crimea, the Cossacks, Nogays, and Caucasian diasporas. Caucasus Survey aims to advance an area studies tradition in the humanities and social sciences about and from the Caucasus, connecting this tradition with core disciplinary concerns in the fields of history, political science, sociology, anthropology, cultural and religious studies, economics, political geography and demography, security, war and peace studies, and social psychology. Research enhancing understanding of the region’s conflicts and relations between the Russian Federation and the Caucasus, internationally and domestically with regard to the North Caucasus, features high in our concerns.