腹部切口疝斜切缝合腹膜内挂网修补术的研究

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Junpei Takashima, K. Taniguchi, T. Yasui, Masahiro Yamane, Yutaka Hattori, Ayaka Ito, Takumi Hikawa, Fumi Shigehara, Sachiyo Kawamura, Kenji Yamazaki, F. Miura, H. Kobayashi
{"title":"腹部切口疝斜切缝合腹膜内挂网修补术的研究","authors":"Junpei Takashima, K. Taniguchi, T. Yasui, Masahiro Yamane, Yutaka Hattori, Ayaka Ito, Takumi Hikawa, Fumi Shigehara, Sachiyo Kawamura, Kenji Yamazaki, F. Miura, H. Kobayashi","doi":"10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00024.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n We investigated the validity of our intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) Plus technique with barbed sutures.\n \n \n \n Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair has become a proven method for treating abdominal incisional hernias in recent years. There have been a few reports on the utility of IPOM Plus, which is IPOM + celiorrhaphy, although this method has not been widely discussed. We adopted the IPOM Plus technique with barbed sutures at our hospital and investigated the validity of this technique.\n \n \n \n We included 7 patients who underwent IPOM Plus repair from 2015 to 2017 at our hospital. We excluded patients with a hernia hilum <2 cm or ≥10 cm, age < 20 years old, PS3 or more, and uncontrolled comorbidity. The hernial orifice was closed laparoscopically using barbed sutures and subsequently secured by tacking on an onlay mesh.\n \n \n \n The median hernial orifice size of the 7 patients was 45 mm (25 to 55 mm). Hernia onset occurred after laparotomy in all cases. In one case, an abdominal incisional hernia recurred after IPOM used to treat the condition 15 years earlier. The mean duration of surgery was 80.5 minutes (53 to 126 minutes), and the median pain scale score was 3 points (0 to 3 points), indicating little pain. None of the patients reported persistent postoperative pain. The mean duration of the postoperative hospital stay was a median of 3.5 days (2 to 5 days). Both short- and long-term outcomes indicated that no recurrence or complications, such as bulging or seroma, occurred.\n \n \n \n IPOM Plus with intracavitary abdominal suturing using barbed suture for abdominal scar hernia repair may be a valid surgical procedure.\n","PeriodicalId":14474,"journal":{"name":"International surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair Using Barbed Sutures for Abdominal Incisional Hernia\",\"authors\":\"Junpei Takashima, K. Taniguchi, T. Yasui, Masahiro Yamane, Yutaka Hattori, Ayaka Ito, Takumi Hikawa, Fumi Shigehara, Sachiyo Kawamura, Kenji Yamazaki, F. Miura, H. Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00024.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n We investigated the validity of our intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) Plus technique with barbed sutures.\\n \\n \\n \\n Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair has become a proven method for treating abdominal incisional hernias in recent years. There have been a few reports on the utility of IPOM Plus, which is IPOM + celiorrhaphy, although this method has not been widely discussed. We adopted the IPOM Plus technique with barbed sutures at our hospital and investigated the validity of this technique.\\n \\n \\n \\n We included 7 patients who underwent IPOM Plus repair from 2015 to 2017 at our hospital. We excluded patients with a hernia hilum <2 cm or ≥10 cm, age < 20 years old, PS3 or more, and uncontrolled comorbidity. The hernial orifice was closed laparoscopically using barbed sutures and subsequently secured by tacking on an onlay mesh.\\n \\n \\n \\n The median hernial orifice size of the 7 patients was 45 mm (25 to 55 mm). Hernia onset occurred after laparotomy in all cases. In one case, an abdominal incisional hernia recurred after IPOM used to treat the condition 15 years earlier. The mean duration of surgery was 80.5 minutes (53 to 126 minutes), and the median pain scale score was 3 points (0 to 3 points), indicating little pain. None of the patients reported persistent postoperative pain. The mean duration of the postoperative hospital stay was a median of 3.5 days (2 to 5 days). Both short- and long-term outcomes indicated that no recurrence or complications, such as bulging or seroma, occurred.\\n \\n \\n \\n IPOM Plus with intracavitary abdominal suturing using barbed suture for abdominal scar hernia repair may be a valid surgical procedure.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":14474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00024.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00024.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了带倒钩缝线的腹膜内在线网状物(IPOM)Plus技术的有效性。近年来,腹腔镜腹膜内嵌网修补术已成为治疗腹部切口疝的一种行之有效的方法。关于IPOM Plus的效用,也就是IPOM+celorhaphy,已经有一些报道,尽管这种方法还没有被广泛讨论。我们在医院采用了带倒钩缝线的IPOM Plus技术,并调查了该技术的有效性。我们纳入了2015年至2017年在我院接受IPOM Plus修复的7名患者。我们排除了疝门<2 cm或≥10 cm、年龄<20岁、PS3或以上、合并症未控制的患者。使用带倒钩的缝合线在腹腔镜下闭合疝口,随后通过固定在线上的网片固定。7名患者的疝口正中尺寸为45毫米(25至55毫米)。所有病例均发生在剖腹手术后。在一个案例中,15年前IPOM用于治疗这种情况后,腹部切口疝复发。手术的平均持续时间为80.5分钟(53至126分钟),中位疼痛量表评分为3分(0至3分),表明疼痛很小。没有一名患者报告术后持续疼痛。术后平均住院时间中位数为3.5天(2-5天)。短期和长期结果均表明,未发生复发或并发症,如膨出或浆膜瘤。IPOM加上带倒钩缝线的腔内腹部缝合用于腹部瘢痕疝修补术可能是一种有效的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study of Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair Using Barbed Sutures for Abdominal Incisional Hernia
We investigated the validity of our intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) Plus technique with barbed sutures. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair has become a proven method for treating abdominal incisional hernias in recent years. There have been a few reports on the utility of IPOM Plus, which is IPOM + celiorrhaphy, although this method has not been widely discussed. We adopted the IPOM Plus technique with barbed sutures at our hospital and investigated the validity of this technique. We included 7 patients who underwent IPOM Plus repair from 2015 to 2017 at our hospital. We excluded patients with a hernia hilum <2 cm or ≥10 cm, age < 20 years old, PS3 or more, and uncontrolled comorbidity. The hernial orifice was closed laparoscopically using barbed sutures and subsequently secured by tacking on an onlay mesh. The median hernial orifice size of the 7 patients was 45 mm (25 to 55 mm). Hernia onset occurred after laparotomy in all cases. In one case, an abdominal incisional hernia recurred after IPOM used to treat the condition 15 years earlier. The mean duration of surgery was 80.5 minutes (53 to 126 minutes), and the median pain scale score was 3 points (0 to 3 points), indicating little pain. None of the patients reported persistent postoperative pain. The mean duration of the postoperative hospital stay was a median of 3.5 days (2 to 5 days). Both short- and long-term outcomes indicated that no recurrence or complications, such as bulging or seroma, occurred. IPOM Plus with intracavitary abdominal suturing using barbed suture for abdominal scar hernia repair may be a valid surgical procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International surgery
International surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Surgery is the Official Journal of the International College of Surgeons. International Surgery has been published since 1938 and has an important position in the global scientific and medical publishing field. The Journal publishes only open access manuscripts. Advantages and benefits of open access publishing in International Surgery include: -worldwide internet transmission -prompt peer reviews -timely publishing following peer review approved manuscripts -even more timely worldwide transmissions of unedited peer review approved manuscripts (“online first”) prior to having copy edited manuscripts formally published. Non-approved peer reviewed manuscript authors have the opportunity to update and improve manuscripts prior to again submitting for peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信