欧洲人权法院：对裁决的审查（hirobalani/西班牙）

Pub Date : 2021-05-20 DOI:10.36719/2663-4619/66/196-198

Toğrul Abbas oğlu Abbaslı

{"title":"欧洲人权法院：对裁决的审查（hirobalani/西班牙）","authors":"Toğrul Abbas oğlu Abbaslı","doi":"10.36719/2663-4619/66/196-198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Court of Human Rights acknowledges the violation of Article 6 in order to provide unfounded reasons for court decisions. Therefore, claims that may affect the outcome of the trial must be answered. The topic is very relevant for research in modern times. Research and comparative methods were used in the study of the topic. The study focused on Turkish and English literature. Key words: Substantiation of Court Decisions, Right to Fair Trial, Right to Defense,European Court of Human Rights,Constitution","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: REVIEW OF DECISIONS (HIRO BALANI / SPAIN)\",\"authors\":\"Toğrul Abbas oğlu Abbaslı\",\"doi\":\"10.36719/2663-4619/66/196-198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Court of Human Rights acknowledges the violation of Article 6 in order to provide unfounded reasons for court decisions. Therefore, claims that may affect the outcome of the trial must be answered. The topic is very relevant for research in modern times. Research and comparative methods were used in the study of the topic. The study focused on Turkish and English literature. Key words: Substantiation of Court Decisions, Right to Fair Trial, Right to Defense,European Court of Human Rights,Constitution\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/66/196-198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/66/196-198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲人权法院承认违反了第六条，以便为法院的裁决提供毫无根据的理由。因此，必须对可能影响审判结果的指控作出答复。这个话题与现代的研究非常相关。研究中采用了研究和比较的方法。这项研究的重点是土耳其语和英语文学。关键词：法院裁决的实质化、公平审判权、辩护权、欧洲人权法院、宪法

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: REVIEW OF DECISIONS (HIRO BALANI / SPAIN)

The European Court of Human Rights acknowledges the violation of Article 6 in order to provide unfounded reasons for court decisions. Therefore, claims that may affect the outcome of the trial must be answered. The topic is very relevant for research in modern times. Research and comparative methods were used in the study of the topic. The study focused on Turkish and English literature. Key words: Substantiation of Court Decisions, Right to Fair Trial, Right to Defense,European Court of Human Rights,Constitution

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助