新冠肺炎大流行期间脊柱麻醉用于日托手术的回顾性分析

P. Bhattarai, Bikash Khadka, Hemant Adhikari, Rinku Khadka, Apurb Sharma
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间脊柱麻醉用于日托手术的回顾性分析","authors":"P. Bhattarai, Bikash Khadka, Hemant Adhikari, Rinku Khadka, Apurb Sharma","doi":"10.3126/bjhs.v7i3.52759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We preferred general anesthesia over spinal anesthesia for day care surgeries in our center. During COVID-19 pandemic, we planned subarachnoid blocks for daycare surgeries, to minimize aerosol generation and to reduce virus transmission risk to health care professions. \nObjectives: This study intended to compare time of discharge after  subarachnoid block with general anesthesia in day care surgeries. We compare time to achieve post-anesthetic discharge score (PADS) equal to or more than nine; need for overnight hospitalization; and complications. \nMethodology: A retrospective analysis of cases posted for elective daycare surgery in our institute during COVID-19 pandemic from April 2020 to July 2020 were identified. We compared  time to  discharge home in patients who received general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia. Normality of distribution was determined using Two sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tes. Student t test was used for normally distributed data, Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normal distributed data. Categorical variables were analyzed using a chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test.  \nResults: A total of 2214 patients were included in this study.181 patients remained for analysis; 70 in the general anesthesia group and 91  in the spinal anesthesia group. Mean time (+SD) to achieve PADS score in group GA is 263.47(+75.06) whereas in group SAB was 339.55(+156.903). Mean time (+SD) taken to discharge home in group GA was 296.08(+74.76) whereas in group SAB was 365.66(+158.68) minutes respectively. Post hoc power of the study was 95.8. \nConclusion: With low dose bupivacaine, spinal anesthesia is a safe alternative for ambulatory day care surgeries.","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Analysis of Spinal Anesthesia for Daycare Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"P. Bhattarai, Bikash Khadka, Hemant Adhikari, Rinku Khadka, Apurb Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/bjhs.v7i3.52759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: We preferred general anesthesia over spinal anesthesia for day care surgeries in our center. During COVID-19 pandemic, we planned subarachnoid blocks for daycare surgeries, to minimize aerosol generation and to reduce virus transmission risk to health care professions. \\nObjectives: This study intended to compare time of discharge after  subarachnoid block with general anesthesia in day care surgeries. We compare time to achieve post-anesthetic discharge score (PADS) equal to or more than nine; need for overnight hospitalization; and complications. \\nMethodology: A retrospective analysis of cases posted for elective daycare surgery in our institute during COVID-19 pandemic from April 2020 to July 2020 were identified. We compared  time to  discharge home in patients who received general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia. Normality of distribution was determined using Two sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tes. Student t test was used for normally distributed data, Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normal distributed data. Categorical variables were analyzed using a chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test.  \\nResults: A total of 2214 patients were included in this study.181 patients remained for analysis; 70 in the general anesthesia group and 91  in the spinal anesthesia group. Mean time (+SD) to achieve PADS score in group GA is 263.47(+75.06) whereas in group SAB was 339.55(+156.903). Mean time (+SD) taken to discharge home in group GA was 296.08(+74.76) whereas in group SAB was 365.66(+158.68) minutes respectively. Post hoc power of the study was 95.8. \\nConclusion: With low dose bupivacaine, spinal anesthesia is a safe alternative for ambulatory day care surgeries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birat Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birat Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v7i3.52759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v7i3.52759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在我们中心的日托手术中,我们更喜欢全身麻醉而不是脊柱麻醉。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,我们计划在日托手术中使用蛛网膜下腔阻滞,以最大限度地减少气溶胶的产生,并降低病毒传播给医护人员的风险。目的:本研究旨在比较日托手术中蛛网膜下腔阻滞和全身麻醉后的出院时间。我们比较达到麻醉后出院评分(PADS)等于或大于9分的时间;需要住院过夜;以及并发症。方法:对2020年4月至2020年7月新冠肺炎大流行期间我所接受选择性日托手术的病例进行回顾性分析。我们比较了接受全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉的患者出院回家的时间。使用两个样本Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Tes测定分布的正态性。Student t检验用于正态分布数据,Mann-Whitney U检验用于非正态分布的数据。分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行分析。结果:本研究共纳入2214例患者,181例患者有待分析;全麻组70例,脊麻组91例。GA组达到PADS评分的平均时间(+SD)为263.47(+75.06),而SAB组为339.55(+156.903)。GA组出院回家的平均时间为296.08(+74.76),SAB组分别为365.66(+158.68)分钟。研究的事后权力为95.8。结论:使用小剂量布比卡因,脊麻是门诊日托手术的安全替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective Analysis of Spinal Anesthesia for Daycare Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Introduction: We preferred general anesthesia over spinal anesthesia for day care surgeries in our center. During COVID-19 pandemic, we planned subarachnoid blocks for daycare surgeries, to minimize aerosol generation and to reduce virus transmission risk to health care professions. Objectives: This study intended to compare time of discharge after  subarachnoid block with general anesthesia in day care surgeries. We compare time to achieve post-anesthetic discharge score (PADS) equal to or more than nine; need for overnight hospitalization; and complications. Methodology: A retrospective analysis of cases posted for elective daycare surgery in our institute during COVID-19 pandemic from April 2020 to July 2020 were identified. We compared  time to  discharge home in patients who received general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia. Normality of distribution was determined using Two sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tes. Student t test was used for normally distributed data, Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normal distributed data. Categorical variables were analyzed using a chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test.  Results: A total of 2214 patients were included in this study.181 patients remained for analysis; 70 in the general anesthesia group and 91  in the spinal anesthesia group. Mean time (+SD) to achieve PADS score in group GA is 263.47(+75.06) whereas in group SAB was 339.55(+156.903). Mean time (+SD) taken to discharge home in group GA was 296.08(+74.76) whereas in group SAB was 365.66(+158.68) minutes respectively. Post hoc power of the study was 95.8. Conclusion: With low dose bupivacaine, spinal anesthesia is a safe alternative for ambulatory day care surgeries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信