欧盟对移民的外部治理。正义观

IF 2.2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Contemporary Italian Politics Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/23248823.2023.2167485

Nicoletta Pirozzi, Federico Castiglioni

{"title":"欧盟对移民的外部治理。正义观","authors":"Nicoletta Pirozzi, Federico Castiglioni","doi":"10.1080/23248823.2023.2167485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘polycrisis’ has driven a wedge between citizens and leaders, increased the distance between EU member states, and further dented perceptions of the effectiveness and legitimacy of the EU among both groups. One question that could be raised, and which remains at the margins of the analysis, is to what extent ‘public opinion’ (a frequently used term) really captures the views of citizens, and when and why they may not be taken as synonymous.","PeriodicalId":37572,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Italian Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EU’s external governance of migration. Perspectives of justice\",\"authors\":\"Nicoletta Pirozzi, Federico Castiglioni\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23248823.2023.2167485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘polycrisis’ has driven a wedge between citizens and leaders, increased the distance between EU member states, and further dented perceptions of the effectiveness and legitimacy of the EU among both groups. One question that could be raised, and which remains at the margins of the analysis, is to what extent ‘public opinion’ (a frequently used term) really captures the views of citizens, and when and why they may not be taken as synonymous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Italian Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Italian Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2023.2167485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Italian Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2023.2167485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

“多危机”在公民和领导人之间造成了隔阂，增加了欧盟成员国之间的距离，并进一步削弱了两个群体对欧盟有效性和合法性的看法。可以提出的一个问题是，“公众舆论”（一个经常使用的术语）在多大程度上真正反映了公民的观点，以及何时以及为什么不能将其视为同义词，这一问题仍处于分析的边缘。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The EU’s external governance of migration. Perspectives of justice

‘polycrisis’ has driven a wedge between citizens and leaders, increased the distance between EU member states, and further dented perceptions of the effectiveness and legitimacy of the EU among both groups. One question that could be raised, and which remains at the margins of the analysis, is to what extent ‘public opinion’ (a frequently used term) really captures the views of citizens, and when and why they may not be taken as synonymous.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Contemporary Italian Politics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Contemporary Italian Politics, formerly Bulletin of Italian Politics, is a political science journal aimed at academics and policy makers as well as others with a professional or intellectual interest in the politics of Italy. The journal has two main aims: Firstly, to provide rigorous analysis, in the English language, about the politics of what is one of the European Union’s four largest states in terms of population and Gross Domestic Product. We seek to do this aware that too often those in the English-speaking world looking for incisive analysis and insight into the latest trends and developments in Italian politics are likely to be stymied by two contrasting difficulties. On the one hand, they can turn to the daily and weekly print media. Here they will find information on the latest developments, sure enough; but much of it is likely to lack the incisiveness of academic writing and may even be straightforwardly inaccurate. On the other hand, readers can turn either to general political science journals – but here they will have to face the issue of fragmented information – or to specific journals on Italy – in which case they will find that politics is considered only insofar as it is part of the broader field of modern Italian studies[...] The second aim follows from the first insofar as, in seeking to achieve it, we hope thereby to provide analysis that readers will find genuinely useful. With research funding bodies of all kinds giving increasing emphasis to knowledge transfer and increasingly demanding of applicants that they demonstrate the relevance of what they are doing to non-academic ‘end users’, political scientists have a self-interested motive for attempting a closer engagement with outside practitioners.