巴基斯坦马尔丹争端解决委员会的有效性和争端各方的费用分析

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Muhammad Asad Jan, Bushra Hasan Jan, Shakeel Ahmad, Y. Khan
{"title":"巴基斯坦马尔丹争端解决委员会的有效性和争端各方的费用分析","authors":"Muhammad Asad Jan, Bushra Hasan Jan, Shakeel Ahmad, Y. Khan","doi":"10.1108/jacpr-11-2021-0651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe study was conducted with the primary objective of measuring the association between the disputant’s expenses and Dispute Resolution Council (DRC) effectiveness in the study area.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe current study followed a quantitative research design. To obtain the study objectives, data was collected from a sample of 387 respondents in the selected three Tehsils of District Mardan, Pakistan. The respondents were selected through multistage stratified random sampling. At bivariate and multivariate level analyses, chi-square test and Gamma (γ) test statistics were used to test the relationship between variables (expenses of the disputants and effectiveness of DRC). Gender, monthly income and literacy status were used as control variables at the multivariate level.\n\n\nFindings\nAt the bivariate level analysis, the study found a significant association (P = 0.05) of office of DRC is easily accessible, DRC as a cost-effective justice system as compared to other, availability of a vehicle to reach the DRC office and affordable amount for preparation of documents and filing the case with the effectiveness of DRC. At the multivariate level, the study portrayed that the expenses of the disputants enhance the effectiveness of DRC in males to a greater extent than females. However, the costs of the disputants were a universal feature to explain the efficacy of DRC irrespective of monthly income and literacy status.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe present study was limited to cost and expenditure of the disputants which was associated with effectiveness of DRC with collaboration of gender, monthly income and literacy status. Moreover, a representation of “387” was only selected but it was enough for validity and reliability of the research dynamics.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe current study is highly significant for the policymakers for devising alternate policies for disputes resolution as the study focused on the cost and expenditure and recommend suggestions that how to improve the effectiveness of DRC in easy and timely disposal of disputes.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe main objectives of the study is to examine the association between cost and expenditure of the disputant and effectiveness of DRC. In addition, to measure the influence of gender, income and literacy status on the association between the association between cost and expenditure of the disputant and effectiveness of DRC.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe current study is highly significant for policymakers to devise alternate policies for dispute resolution. The study focused on the cost and expenditure and recommended suggestions for improving the effectiveness of DRC in easy and timely disposal of disputes.\n","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of effectiveness of dispute resolution council and expenses of the disputants in Mardan-Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Asad Jan, Bushra Hasan Jan, Shakeel Ahmad, Y. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jacpr-11-2021-0651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe study was conducted with the primary objective of measuring the association between the disputant’s expenses and Dispute Resolution Council (DRC) effectiveness in the study area.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe current study followed a quantitative research design. To obtain the study objectives, data was collected from a sample of 387 respondents in the selected three Tehsils of District Mardan, Pakistan. The respondents were selected through multistage stratified random sampling. At bivariate and multivariate level analyses, chi-square test and Gamma (γ) test statistics were used to test the relationship between variables (expenses of the disputants and effectiveness of DRC). Gender, monthly income and literacy status were used as control variables at the multivariate level.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAt the bivariate level analysis, the study found a significant association (P = 0.05) of office of DRC is easily accessible, DRC as a cost-effective justice system as compared to other, availability of a vehicle to reach the DRC office and affordable amount for preparation of documents and filing the case with the effectiveness of DRC. At the multivariate level, the study portrayed that the expenses of the disputants enhance the effectiveness of DRC in males to a greater extent than females. However, the costs of the disputants were a universal feature to explain the efficacy of DRC irrespective of monthly income and literacy status.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe present study was limited to cost and expenditure of the disputants which was associated with effectiveness of DRC with collaboration of gender, monthly income and literacy status. Moreover, a representation of “387” was only selected but it was enough for validity and reliability of the research dynamics.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe current study is highly significant for the policymakers for devising alternate policies for disputes resolution as the study focused on the cost and expenditure and recommend suggestions that how to improve the effectiveness of DRC in easy and timely disposal of disputes.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThe main objectives of the study is to examine the association between cost and expenditure of the disputant and effectiveness of DRC. In addition, to measure the influence of gender, income and literacy status on the association between the association between cost and expenditure of the disputant and effectiveness of DRC.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe current study is highly significant for policymakers to devise alternate policies for dispute resolution. The study focused on the cost and expenditure and recommended suggestions for improving the effectiveness of DRC in easy and timely disposal of disputes.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-11-2021-0651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-11-2021-0651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究的主要目的是衡量争议方的费用与争议解决委员会(DRC)在研究领域的有效性之间的关系。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用定量研究设计。为了获得研究目标,从巴基斯坦马尔丹区选定的三个县的387名受访者中收集了数据。受访者是通过多阶段分层随机抽样选出的。在双变量和多变量水平分析中,使用卡方检验和伽玛(γ)检验统计量来检验变量之间的关系(争议方的费用和DRC的有效性)。性别、月收入和识字状况被用作多变量水平的控制变量。结果在双变量层面的分析中,该研究发现,刚果民主共和国的办公室很容易进入,与其他司法系统相比,刚果民主民主共和国是一个具有成本效益的司法系统,有车可以到达刚果民主共和国的办公室,以及准备文件和立案的可负担金额与刚果民主共和国有显著联系(P=0.05)。在多变量层面上,该研究表明,与女性相比,争议方的费用在更大程度上提高了男性DRC的有效性。然而,无论月收入和识字状况如何,争议方的成本都是解释刚果民主共和国疗效的普遍特征。研究局限性/含义本研究仅限于争议方的成本和支出,这与DRC在性别、月收入和识字状况方面的有效性有关。此外,只选择了“387”的代表,但这足以证明研究动态的有效性和可靠性。实际含义当前的研究对决策者制定解决争端的替代政策具有重要意义,因为该研究侧重于成本和支出,并就如何提高刚果民主共和国在轻松及时处理争端方面的有效性提出建议。社会含义本研究的主要目的是检验争议方的成本和支出与DRC有效性之间的关系。此外,为了衡量性别、收入和识字状况对争议方成本和支出与争议解决有效性之间关系的影响。原创性/价值当前的研究对决策者制定解决争议的替代政策具有重要意义。该研究侧重于成本和支出,并为提高刚果民主共和国在轻松及时处理争端方面的有效性提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of effectiveness of dispute resolution council and expenses of the disputants in Mardan-Pakistan
Purpose The study was conducted with the primary objective of measuring the association between the disputant’s expenses and Dispute Resolution Council (DRC) effectiveness in the study area. Design/methodology/approach The current study followed a quantitative research design. To obtain the study objectives, data was collected from a sample of 387 respondents in the selected three Tehsils of District Mardan, Pakistan. The respondents were selected through multistage stratified random sampling. At bivariate and multivariate level analyses, chi-square test and Gamma (γ) test statistics were used to test the relationship between variables (expenses of the disputants and effectiveness of DRC). Gender, monthly income and literacy status were used as control variables at the multivariate level. Findings At the bivariate level analysis, the study found a significant association (P = 0.05) of office of DRC is easily accessible, DRC as a cost-effective justice system as compared to other, availability of a vehicle to reach the DRC office and affordable amount for preparation of documents and filing the case with the effectiveness of DRC. At the multivariate level, the study portrayed that the expenses of the disputants enhance the effectiveness of DRC in males to a greater extent than females. However, the costs of the disputants were a universal feature to explain the efficacy of DRC irrespective of monthly income and literacy status. Research limitations/implications The present study was limited to cost and expenditure of the disputants which was associated with effectiveness of DRC with collaboration of gender, monthly income and literacy status. Moreover, a representation of “387” was only selected but it was enough for validity and reliability of the research dynamics. Practical implications The current study is highly significant for the policymakers for devising alternate policies for disputes resolution as the study focused on the cost and expenditure and recommend suggestions that how to improve the effectiveness of DRC in easy and timely disposal of disputes. Social implications The main objectives of the study is to examine the association between cost and expenditure of the disputant and effectiveness of DRC. In addition, to measure the influence of gender, income and literacy status on the association between the association between cost and expenditure of the disputant and effectiveness of DRC. Originality/value The current study is highly significant for policymakers to devise alternate policies for dispute resolution. The study focused on the cost and expenditure and recommended suggestions for improving the effectiveness of DRC in easy and timely disposal of disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信