危机时期的合同履行、违约与合同义务——论欧洲合同法的统一与编纂

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Valentin Jentsch
{"title":"危机时期的合同履行、违约与合同义务——论欧洲合同法的统一与编纂","authors":"Valentin Jentsch","doi":"10.54648/erpl2021045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sanctity of contracts, a guiding principle of contract law in civil law systems, requires that both or all contracting parties be expected to meet their contractual obligations, thereby ensuring efficacy and efficiency of private ordering. Under extraordinary circumstances, however, legal systems provide for mechanisms, which may excuse contractual performance or lead to adaption or termination of contractual obligations. Since the coronavirus pandemic, these mechanisms have clearly gained traction. Drawing on five important civil law jurisdictions (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Italy), this article elaborates on excuses of contractual performance and remedies for breach of contract and on adaption or termination of contractual obligations. The article aims to address the fundamental questions, whether these excuses and remedies and institutions on adaption or termination still serve their purpose in times of pandemic or whether and to what extent a uniform breach of contract action or a codification of such institutions is needed in European Contract Law. A functional and comparative approach is used to unfold and analyse these timeless questions from a contemporary perspective.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contractual Performance, Breach of Contract and Contractual Obligations in Times of Crisis: On the Need for Unification and Codification in European Contract Law\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Jentsch\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/erpl2021045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The sanctity of contracts, a guiding principle of contract law in civil law systems, requires that both or all contracting parties be expected to meet their contractual obligations, thereby ensuring efficacy and efficiency of private ordering. Under extraordinary circumstances, however, legal systems provide for mechanisms, which may excuse contractual performance or lead to adaption or termination of contractual obligations. Since the coronavirus pandemic, these mechanisms have clearly gained traction. Drawing on five important civil law jurisdictions (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Italy), this article elaborates on excuses of contractual performance and remedies for breach of contract and on adaption or termination of contractual obligations. The article aims to address the fundamental questions, whether these excuses and remedies and institutions on adaption or termination still serve their purpose in times of pandemic or whether and to what extent a uniform breach of contract action or a codification of such institutions is needed in European Contract Law. A functional and comparative approach is used to unfold and analyse these timeless questions from a contemporary perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Private Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2021045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2021045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合同的神圣性是大陆法系合同法的一项指导原则,要求双方或所有缔约方履行其合同义务,从而确保私人订购的效力和效率。然而,在特殊情况下,法律制度规定了一些机制,这些机制可能会为履行合同开脱,或导致调整或终止合同义务。自新冠病毒大流行以来,这些机制显然得到了推动。本文以德国、奥地利、瑞士、法国、意大利五个重要的民法管辖区为例,阐述了履行合同的借口、违约救济以及合同义务的适应或终止。该条款旨在解决根本问题,即在疫情期间,这些关于适应或终止的借口、补救措施和制度是否仍能达到其目的,或者在多大程度上,欧洲合同法是否需要统一的违约诉讼或对此类制度进行编纂。运用功能和比较的方法,从当代的角度来展开和分析这些永恒的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contractual Performance, Breach of Contract and Contractual Obligations in Times of Crisis: On the Need for Unification and Codification in European Contract Law
The sanctity of contracts, a guiding principle of contract law in civil law systems, requires that both or all contracting parties be expected to meet their contractual obligations, thereby ensuring efficacy and efficiency of private ordering. Under extraordinary circumstances, however, legal systems provide for mechanisms, which may excuse contractual performance or lead to adaption or termination of contractual obligations. Since the coronavirus pandemic, these mechanisms have clearly gained traction. Drawing on five important civil law jurisdictions (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Italy), this article elaborates on excuses of contractual performance and remedies for breach of contract and on adaption or termination of contractual obligations. The article aims to address the fundamental questions, whether these excuses and remedies and institutions on adaption or termination still serve their purpose in times of pandemic or whether and to what extent a uniform breach of contract action or a codification of such institutions is needed in European Contract Law. A functional and comparative approach is used to unfold and analyse these timeless questions from a contemporary perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信