QuEChERS萃取法分析橄榄树部位中药物活性成分的评价

IF 5.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gennaro Brunetti, Andreina Traversa, Francesco De Mastro, Bartolomeo Dichio, Francesca Mottola, Alba N. Mininni, Pietro Nigro, Claudio Cocozza
{"title":"QuEChERS萃取法分析橄榄树部位中药物活性成分的评价","authors":"Gennaro Brunetti,&nbsp;Andreina Traversa,&nbsp;Francesco De Mastro,&nbsp;Bartolomeo Dichio,&nbsp;Francesca Mottola,&nbsp;Alba N. Mininni,&nbsp;Pietro Nigro,&nbsp;Claudio Cocozza","doi":"10.1186/s40538-023-00454-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A modified version of the QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) method has been tested for quantifying six active compounds of pharmaceuticals (PhACs), i.e., two different antibiotics, two anti-inflammatories, one antifungal, and one anti-depressant, extracted from roots, leaves and stems, pulp, pits, and oil obtained from olive trees. The different matrices have been polluted with all contaminants at 25, 50, and 250 µg L<sup>−1</sup> and the recoveries were determined by liquid chromatography tandem–mass spectrometry. The validation of the method has been carried out by determining linearity, recovery, precision, limits of detection (LODs), and limits of quantification (LOQs) values. A matrix-matched calibration for each matrix has been adopted in order to avoid the matrix effect at the aforementioned levels of fortification.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The recoveries of PhACs from the different matrices were always above 70% and the relative standard deviation (RSD) always ≤ 20%, conditions required for the validation of the method. The LOD and LOQ values were always lower than 25 µg L<sup>−1</sup>, i.e., always lower than the minimum concentration used in the experiment; therefore, the method can be validated at 25, 50, and 250 µg L<sup>−1</sup>.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This method can represent a valid alternative to the traditional extraction methods to quantify pharmaceuticals extracted also from fatty matrices.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n <figure><div><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></div></figure>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":512,"journal":{"name":"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://chembioagro.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40538-023-00454-z","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the QuEChERS extraction approach for the analysis of active compounds of pharmaceuticals in olive tree portions\",\"authors\":\"Gennaro Brunetti,&nbsp;Andreina Traversa,&nbsp;Francesco De Mastro,&nbsp;Bartolomeo Dichio,&nbsp;Francesca Mottola,&nbsp;Alba N. Mininni,&nbsp;Pietro Nigro,&nbsp;Claudio Cocozza\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40538-023-00454-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A modified version of the QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) method has been tested for quantifying six active compounds of pharmaceuticals (PhACs), i.e., two different antibiotics, two anti-inflammatories, one antifungal, and one anti-depressant, extracted from roots, leaves and stems, pulp, pits, and oil obtained from olive trees. The different matrices have been polluted with all contaminants at 25, 50, and 250 µg L<sup>−1</sup> and the recoveries were determined by liquid chromatography tandem–mass spectrometry. The validation of the method has been carried out by determining linearity, recovery, precision, limits of detection (LODs), and limits of quantification (LOQs) values. A matrix-matched calibration for each matrix has been adopted in order to avoid the matrix effect at the aforementioned levels of fortification.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The recoveries of PhACs from the different matrices were always above 70% and the relative standard deviation (RSD) always ≤ 20%, conditions required for the validation of the method. The LOD and LOQ values were always lower than 25 µg L<sup>−1</sup>, i.e., always lower than the minimum concentration used in the experiment; therefore, the method can be validated at 25, 50, and 250 µg L<sup>−1</sup>.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This method can represent a valid alternative to the traditional extraction methods to quantify pharmaceuticals extracted also from fatty matrices.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n <figure><div><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></div></figure>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://chembioagro.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40538-023-00454-z\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40538-023-00454-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40538-023-00454-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一种改良版的QuEChERS(快速、简单、廉价、有效、坚固和安全)方法已被用于定量测定六种药物活性化合物(PhACs),即两种不同的抗生素、两种抗炎药、一种抗真菌药和一种抗抑郁药,这些药物从橄榄树的根、叶和茎、果肉、果核和油中提取。在25、50和250µg L−1的浓度下对不同的基质进行污染,并采用液相色谱串联质谱法测定回收率。通过测定线性、回收率、精密度、检出限(lod)和定量限(loq)值对该方法进行了验证。为了避免上述强化水平的矩阵效应,对每个矩阵采用矩阵匹配校准。结果不同基质中PhACs的加样回收率均在70%以上,相对标准偏差(RSD)均≤20%,符合验证条件。LOD和LOQ值始终低于25µg L−1,即始终低于实验中使用的最小浓度;因此,该方法可以在25、50和250µg L−1下进行验证。结论该方法可替代传统的提取方法定量提取脂肪基质中提取的药物。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the QuEChERS extraction approach for the analysis of active compounds of pharmaceuticals in olive tree portions

Background

A modified version of the QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) method has been tested for quantifying six active compounds of pharmaceuticals (PhACs), i.e., two different antibiotics, two anti-inflammatories, one antifungal, and one anti-depressant, extracted from roots, leaves and stems, pulp, pits, and oil obtained from olive trees. The different matrices have been polluted with all contaminants at 25, 50, and 250 µg L−1 and the recoveries were determined by liquid chromatography tandem–mass spectrometry. The validation of the method has been carried out by determining linearity, recovery, precision, limits of detection (LODs), and limits of quantification (LOQs) values. A matrix-matched calibration for each matrix has been adopted in order to avoid the matrix effect at the aforementioned levels of fortification.

Results

The recoveries of PhACs from the different matrices were always above 70% and the relative standard deviation (RSD) always ≤ 20%, conditions required for the validation of the method. The LOD and LOQ values were always lower than 25 µg L−1, i.e., always lower than the minimum concentration used in the experiment; therefore, the method can be validated at 25, 50, and 250 µg L−1.

Conclusions

This method can represent a valid alternative to the traditional extraction methods to quantify pharmaceuticals extracted also from fatty matrices.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed forum for the advancement and application to all fields of agriculture of modern chemical, biochemical and molecular technologies. The scope of this journal includes chemical and biochemical processes aimed to increase sustainable agricultural and food production, the evaluation of quality and origin of raw primary products and their transformation into foods and chemicals, as well as environmental monitoring and remediation. Of special interest are the effects of chemical and biochemical technologies, also at the nano and supramolecular scale, on the relationships between soil, plants, microorganisms and their environment, with the help of modern bioinformatics. Another special focus is the use of modern bioorganic and biological chemistry to develop new technologies for plant nutrition and bio-stimulation, advancement of biorefineries from biomasses, safe and traceable food products, carbon storage in soil and plants and restoration of contaminated soils to agriculture. This journal presents the first opportunity to bring together researchers from a wide number of disciplines within the agricultural chemical and biological sciences, from both industry and academia. The principle aim of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is to allow the exchange of the most advanced chemical and biochemical knowledge to develop technologies which address one of the most pressing challenges of our times - sustaining a growing world population. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture publishes original research articles, short letters and invited reviews. Articles from scientists in industry, academia as well as private research institutes, non-governmental and environmental organizations are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信