辅导员教育中的一般质性学位论文：内容分析

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION Pub Date : 2023-02-05 DOI:10.1002/ceas.12261

Phillip L. Waalkes, Daniel Andrew DeCino, Joe LeBlanc, Monica Maria Phelps-Pineda, Tiffany Somerville, Stephen V. Flynn

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对通用的定性咨询论文(GQR;N = 70)，检验其方法论的合理性、一致性和可信度。论文作者经常提出模糊的方法论证。研究结果对构建方法学论证、整合相关文献以及认识GQR与其他定性方法学的比较具有启示意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Generic qualitative dissertations in counselor education: A content analysis

We conducted a content analysis of generic qualitative counseling dissertations (GQR; N = 70), examining their methodological justifications, coherence, and trustworthiness. Dissertations authors often presented vague methodological justifications. Findings have implications for constructing methodological justifications, integrating relevant literature, and awareness of how GQR compares to other qualitative methodologies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

38.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Counselor Education and Supervision is dedicated to publishing manuscripts concerned with research, theory development, or program applications related to counselor education and supervision. It is concerned with the preparation and supervision of counselors in agency or school settings, in colleges and universities or at local, state, or federal levels. This journal is the official publication of the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision (ACES), a member association of the American Counseling Association (ACA).