温带森林管理模式的文献计量分析:可持续森林管理工具的全球视角

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
María-Cristina Ordoñez, L. Galicia
{"title":"温带森林管理模式的文献计量分析:可持续森林管理工具的全球视角","authors":"María-Cristina Ordoñez, L. Galicia","doi":"10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.11.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bibliometric analysis is a quantitative tool for recognizing trends and research gaps in \ntopics of scientific interest. \nObjective: To identify progress in scientific production, collaborative networks, research issues \nand application of models of temperate forest management (MTFM), on a global scale, in relation to \nmanagement, productivity, carbon storage and nutrient cycling. \nMaterials and methods: The review focused on the collection of data from the Web of Science Core \nCollection platform in the period 2005-2019. \nResults and discussion: The bibliometric analysis made possible to collect 960 specialized scientific \narticles on the topic, from journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR). The institutions with the \ngreatest academic authority in forest management studies were Natural Resources of Canada (NRCan), \nInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and US Forest Service. MTFM topics focused on \nforest plantation growth, effects of forest practices on structure, productivity, carbon sequestration and, to \na lesser extent, nutrient availability. Mexico showed low collaboration with other institutions and a forest \napproach in the application of models. \nConclusions: The analysis helped to guide research on MTFM in Mexico. The implementation of models \nis recommended to achieve forest harvesting based on an integrated understanding of the system and thus \nprovide sustainability.","PeriodicalId":54479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometric Analysis of Models for Temperate Forest Management: A Global Perspective on Sustainable Forest Management Tools\",\"authors\":\"María-Cristina Ordoñez, L. Galicia\",\"doi\":\"10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.11.079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Bibliometric analysis is a quantitative tool for recognizing trends and research gaps in \\ntopics of scientific interest. \\nObjective: To identify progress in scientific production, collaborative networks, research issues \\nand application of models of temperate forest management (MTFM), on a global scale, in relation to \\nmanagement, productivity, carbon storage and nutrient cycling. \\nMaterials and methods: The review focused on the collection of data from the Web of Science Core \\nCollection platform in the period 2005-2019. \\nResults and discussion: The bibliometric analysis made possible to collect 960 specialized scientific \\narticles on the topic, from journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR). The institutions with the \\ngreatest academic authority in forest management studies were Natural Resources of Canada (NRCan), \\nInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and US Forest Service. MTFM topics focused on \\nforest plantation growth, effects of forest practices on structure, productivity, carbon sequestration and, to \\na lesser extent, nutrient availability. Mexico showed low collaboration with other institutions and a forest \\napproach in the application of models. \\nConclusions: The analysis helped to guide research on MTFM in Mexico. The implementation of models \\nis recommended to achieve forest harvesting based on an integrated understanding of the system and thus \\nprovide sustainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.11.079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.11.079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言:文献计量分析是一种定量工具,用于识别科学感兴趣主题的趋势和研究差距。目的:确定全球范围内温带森林管理模式在管理、生产力、碳储存和营养循环方面的科学生产、合作网络、研究问题和应用进展。材料和方法:审查的重点是2005-2019年期间从科学网核心收集平台收集的数据。结果与讨论:文献计量学分析使得从期刊引文报告(JCR)中收录的期刊中收集到960篇关于该主题的专业科学文章成为可能。在森林管理研究方面拥有最大学术权威的机构是加拿大自然资源局、国家农学研究所和美国林业局。MTFM的主题集中在植树造林的生长、森林实践对结构、生产力、碳固存的影响,以及在较小程度上对养分供应的影响。墨西哥与其他机构的合作程度较低,在应用模式方面采用森林办法。结论:该分析有助于指导墨西哥MTFM的研究。建议在综合了解该系统的基础上实施各种模式,以实现森林采伐,从而提供可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bibliometric Analysis of Models for Temperate Forest Management: A Global Perspective on Sustainable Forest Management Tools
Introduction: Bibliometric analysis is a quantitative tool for recognizing trends and research gaps in topics of scientific interest. Objective: To identify progress in scientific production, collaborative networks, research issues and application of models of temperate forest management (MTFM), on a global scale, in relation to management, productivity, carbon storage and nutrient cycling. Materials and methods: The review focused on the collection of data from the Web of Science Core Collection platform in the period 2005-2019. Results and discussion: The bibliometric analysis made possible to collect 960 specialized scientific articles on the topic, from journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR). The institutions with the greatest academic authority in forest management studies were Natural Resources of Canada (NRCan), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and US Forest Service. MTFM topics focused on forest plantation growth, effects of forest practices on structure, productivity, carbon sequestration and, to a lesser extent, nutrient availability. Mexico showed low collaboration with other institutions and a forest approach in the application of models. Conclusions: The analysis helped to guide research on MTFM in Mexico. The implementation of models is recommended to achieve forest harvesting based on an integrated understanding of the system and thus provide sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente (RCHSCFA) is a scientific journal that aims to raise awareness of high-quality research products related to forest, arid, temperate and tropical environments in the world. Since its foundation in 1994, the RCHSCFA has served as a space for scientific dissemination and discussion at a national and international level among academics, researchers, undergraduate and graduate students, forest managers and public/private entities that are interested in the forest environment. All content published in the journal first goes through a strict triple-blind review process and is published in the following formats: Scientific Articles, Review Articles, Methodologies, Technical or Technological Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信