生产系统的稳健性:来自德国制造业的证据

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Christian Stockmann, Herwig Winkler
{"title":"生产系统的稳健性:来自德国制造业的证据","authors":"Christian Stockmann,&nbsp;Herwig Winkler","doi":"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Robustness of production systems is a popular research topic that comes in many facets. However, apart from a few case studies, not much is known about what robustness actually means in practice. Therefore, this study analyzes how practitioners deal with robustness. The data is based on a fairly representative survey of the German manufacturing industry. Amongst others, it is shown what practitioners understand by robustness, how they assess it, and which measures they consider as suitable to improve it. The results not only allow practitioners to compare their own status with industry’s best practices, but also suggest further researcher areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robustness of production systems: Evidence from the German manufacturing industry\",\"authors\":\"Christian Stockmann,&nbsp;Herwig Winkler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Robustness of production systems is a popular research topic that comes in many facets. However, apart from a few case studies, not much is known about what robustness actually means in practice. Therefore, this study analyzes how practitioners deal with robustness. The data is based on a fairly representative survey of the German manufacturing industry. Amongst others, it is shown what practitioners understand by robustness, how they assess it, and which measures they consider as suitable to improve it. The results not only allow practitioners to compare their own status with industry’s best practices, but also suggest further researcher areas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474822000029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474822000029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生产系统的鲁棒性是一个流行的研究课题,涉及许多方面。然而,除了少数案例研究之外,我们对鲁棒性在实践中的实际含义知之甚少。因此,本研究分析从业者如何处理鲁棒性。这些数据是基于对德国制造业相当有代表性的调查得出的。除此之外,它还显示了从业者对鲁棒性的理解,他们如何评估它,以及他们认为哪些措施适合改进它。研究结果不仅可以让从业者将自己的状况与行业最佳实践进行比较,还可以为进一步的研究领域提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robustness of production systems: Evidence from the German manufacturing industry

Robustness of production systems is a popular research topic that comes in many facets. However, apart from a few case studies, not much is known about what robustness actually means in practice. Therefore, this study analyzes how practitioners deal with robustness. The data is based on a fairly representative survey of the German manufacturing industry. Amongst others, it is shown what practitioners understand by robustness, how they assess it, and which measures they consider as suitable to improve it. The results not only allow practitioners to compare their own status with industry’s best practices, but also suggest further researcher areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (JET-M) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology, innovation, and engineering management. The journal links engineering, science, and management disciplines. It addresses the issues involved in the planning, development, and implementation of technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and operational objectives of an organization. It covers not only R&D management, but also the entire spectrum of managerial concerns in technology-based organizations. This includes issues relating to new product development, human resource management, innovation process management, project management, technological fusion, marketing, technological forecasting and strategic planning. The journal provides an interface between technology and other corporate functions, such as R&D, marketing, manufacturing and administration. Its ultimate goal is to make a profound contribution to theory development, research and practice by serving as a leading forum for the publication of scholarly research on all aspects of technology, innovation, and engineering management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信